Ep 65 - Unmoderated NAP debate with @LiquidZulu

Support Better SensemakinWhat you’re about to listen to is an unmoderated debate between myself and @LiquidZulu (YouTube). Our basic resolution read:Resolved: "The executive orders passed by Gov Abbot in TX banning vaccine mandates for any entity is equally as oppressive as the executive orders issued by President Biden requiring vaccine mandates for business with more than 100 workers"I took the negative, he took the positive. We also agreed to use the following definition for the non-aggression principle The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, or the anti-coercion or zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. The principle is a deontological (or rule-based) ethical stance. This debate should be of interest to all libertarians, and while we didn't part in agreement, I thank @LiquidZulu for taking the time to come on my show. THIS WEEK @ BEENAWAKE.COMWhat else..?follow.beenawake.com to find me on all social mediaCheck me out on other shows at beenawake.com/appearancesSupportCash App $beenawakeGo to beenawake.com/subscribe to become a recurring subscriberVisit Buymeacoffee.com/beenawake for one time donations!America needs a software update, share this patch This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit beenawake.substack.com/subscribe