Episode 126: Notwithstanding clause on trial. Plus, why YOU may need a No Trespassing sign. episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 26, 2026 · 42 MIN

Episode 126: Notwithstanding clause on trial. Plus, why YOU may need a No Trespassing sign.

from Not Reserving Judgment · host Canadian Constitution Foundation

In Episode 126, we explain what happened this week at the Supreme Court in the notwithstanding clause case, we explain why the R v Singer decision means you should consider putting up a No Trespassing sign. Plus, our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:How a ban on religious symbols has triggered a Canadian constitutional debate (BBC)R. v. Singer, 2026 SCC 8 (Supreme Court of Canada)Was Upset By Facebook Post (Blacklock's Reporter)Judge cuts down scope of Calgary bubble zone bylaw; CCF calls on city to fully repeal (TheCCF.ca)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 26, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Episode 126: Notwithstanding clause on trial. Plus, why YOU may need a No Trespassing sign.

0:00 42:04

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Not Reserving Judgment?

This episode is 42 minutes long.

When was this Not Reserving Judgment episode published?

This episode was published on March 26, 2026.

Can I download this Not Reserving Judgment episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!