Episode 13: Reasonable Doubt? The Lawmas Discuss the Scott Peterson Case

In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views! First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses! Now onto the Scott Peterson case. Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include: Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson Originally sentenced to death penalty Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence Differing Legal Perspectives Lauren believes Peterson is guilty Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict Watch to learn their reasons! There have been several new developments in the case: Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues New DNA evidence pending testing California nonprofit involvement in case review Discussion of potential new trial possibilities Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis: Jury selection process (voir dire) Discussion of circumstantial evidence Evolution of DNA evidence in court Changes in trial procedures due to technology "The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey "I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren Looking Ahead: Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode! Future episode on voir dire process planned Where to Follow: Apple Podcasts YouTube Instagram Facebook Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!   #podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime