Episode 13: What's Wrong with the IAT? (with Jesse Singal)

What this episode covers

Journalist Jesse Singal joins Yoel and Mickey to talk about the state of science journalism, what he thinks is wrong with how people interpret the Implicit Association Test (IAT), and the pros and cons of moral outrage. Why do so many science journalists simply repeat talking points from university press releases? Is it ethical to administer the IAT as a teaching tool? What is social media like for a journalist? Bonus: Yoel, Mickey, & Jesse discuss a new paper arguing there are upsides to moral outrage. Special Guest: Jesse Singal. Links: Dunham Orange de Dunham Brasserie Dunham — Dunham brewery was founded on June 1st 2011. Our portfolio reflect our passion for this fine nectar. Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) | Twitter The Upside of Outrage: Trends in Cognitive Sciences — The Upside of Outrage Online outrage: The good, the bad, and the ugly Science of Us: Productivity, Mental Health, & Relationships - The Cut Psychology’s Racism-Measuring Tool Isn’t Up to the Job -- Science of Us — Almost two decades after its introduction, the implicit association test has failed to deliver on its lofty promises. How to Think about "Implicit Bias" - Scientific American — Amidst a controversy, it’s important to remember that implicit bias is real—and it matters Blindspot Disproportionate Use of Lethal Force in Policing Is Associated With Regional Racial Biases of Residents Boston Celtics vs Toronto Raptors | October 19, 2018 - YouTube

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.