Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 3, 2024 · 31 MIN

Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

from Law Bytes · host Michael Geist

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 3, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

0:00 31:01

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Law Bytes?

This episode is 31 minutes long.

When was this Law Bytes episode published?

This episode was published on June 3, 2024.

Can I download this Law Bytes episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!