What's okay about this is Regrada of P2P Radio as always. Thank you for joining with us. We're excited to have you when we have a great so set up for you. First up we're going to talk about President Trump and if he is going to essentially, I don't know, nucos or whatnot, but we're covering that.
Also we're going to be talking with Mr. Ann Lawson going into depth with him as well. So let's get started. We're going to P2P.
Alright, so thank you again for joining with us. We're glad to have you here on this lovely Thursday. I'm your humble and gracious host, Regrada. I'm sitting across the airway.
We're going to bring in our awesome guests as well. First up we're going to talk about is of course our president who is just a marvelous person to say the least. What we're going to talk about with him is our emberfist to North Korea because this weekend is exciting. They've been backing forward from the middle times.
President Trump himself had also escalated the rhetoric yesterday. We're going to play that clip. Also he says some interesting things about Russia, of course. It's probably like he took about a 20 minute interview with reporters, just hosting a whole field of questions.
We're going to give you his response when he was asked, when he's saying to President Putin when he just kicked out 700 plus different acts from Russia this past week. So first up let's see what this president has to say to North Korea. Well I don't think they made that and I think the first time they heard it like they heard it. And frankly the people that were questioning that statement wasn't too tough.
Maybe it wasn't tough enough. They've been doing this dark country for a long time for many years. It's about time that somebody stuck up to the people of this country and for the people of other countries. What they've been doing and what they've been getting away with is a tragedy.
And it can't be allowed. If North Korea does anything in terms of even thinking about attacking anybody that we love or we represent or our allies or us, they can be very, very nervous. I'll tell you what, and they should be very nervous because things will happen to them like they never thought possible. The people of our country are safe, our allies are safe, and I will tell you this.
North Korea better get their act together or they're going to be in trouble, like a few nations ever have been in trouble in this world. So that was again President Trump saying that maybe he's read a record with North Korea saying the bad theories. Maybe that wasn't tense enough or tough enough. Essentially we are engaging in a battle of words, a pissing match in reality with a country that barely has internet.
And that's what the United States is doing right now. In my opinion that makes us look a little bit weak because again it's not Russia, it's not China, it's North Korea. The United States have roughly about 16,000 plus nukes. North Korea maybe has 10 to 60, and 60 even generous numbers.
So why is it that we're having to have these exchange of words with a country that we can literally again wipe out if you wanted to. And in reality North Korea knows this, it's not crazy, he's not stupid either. It's that he wants something in that pocket because he has looked at Libya, he looked at Syria, he looked at all these locations who went up against United States and lost. And they didn't all have any comment that they did not have anything in their pocket to make United States take itself back.
The nuke does that. However again he knows that the moment that he fires off this nuke at Sakharia, at Japan, at war, at the United States the moment that his country ceased to exist because this is not usually a street destruction. But if the real world can actually hurt us, yeah, then they hit a city that will do damage. But in a turn the hell-farted country will receive will absolutely annihilate that country.
Kim Jong Un understands that and knows that. So essentially he wants an insurance that the United States is not going to try to do regime change. But he is not going to go to war with the United States because he knows that China and Russia may not back him. And with that in mind he knows that he will lose.
So my good advice by the Trump is you're the big player on the block. Stop swining at ants. Stop trying to have any stage in the words with ants. It makes you look a little bit pain.
The second thing is in reference to President Trump in Vladimir Putin. Because it's an interesting comparison that you look at President Trump and you look at the things he says about North Korea, about any other foreign nation that he doesn't like, about our allies, about our hit political allies, for example, Mitch McConnell, your sessions, anybody else? He will go toe to toe with them. But for some reason when he comes to Vladimir Putin he doesn't want to do that.
He was asked today about a response to the actions of Russia and taking out 700 plus a biodivor mass. In retaliation for us taking their spy grounds here in the United States. You would expect maybe there would be some rhetoric of we're not going to put up with this or we're seriously concerned. You know, the usual political rhetoric that doesn't really need anything.
But because the Trump actually went beyond that. This is his fault of what he said when asked that question. He said, also in explaining many US Democrats and Russia. I want to thank him because we're trying to cut down our payroll.
And as far as our concern, I'm very thankful. Thankful that he let go a large number of people because now we have a small play role. There's no reason for them to go back. I'm really appreciate the fact that we have been able to cut out payroll of the United States.
We really want to save a lot of money. So as far as that, that not how payroll works. As far as that, that's just because the entire country doesn't need their fire. So as far as that, you're again, there are no people who are not firing anybody.
Because again, if he's Russia, then we're the United States. So it kind of has no extra power here. But it's free that again, the president of the United States is taking the president of Russia for expelling the United States. That's just doesn't seem right to me.
That seems somewhat weird, somewhat out of place. Could you imagine if President Bush, or President Clinton, or any other president, thank an adversary of ours for doing an adverse action? It was that anti-American action. It was done to hurt us.
And now we have the president of the United States thanking him for doing that action in real time. Things just seem a little bit out of place. I know what you're thinking. Maybe we should talk about the West Bank, but we'll go more than that later.
But right now what we're going to do is pull in our special guest. And that is none other than the one and only Mr. Aaron Lawson. Sir, how's it going with you?
It's crazy. So I think when we go to the next, what we're going to talk about, which is of course the Democratic Party, give us your take on what you think about that exchange you saw. And do you think that that was kind of, you know, somewhat out of place? Well, most of what Donald Trump does is somewhat to mostly out of place and kind of imbalanced for lack of a better term.
In regards to Russia, I think he should kind of chill up, chill and give a little space to Russia, especially since he's trying to, you know, all these in-depth investigations of Russia and him and the connection to him. So when someone does adverse reactions to Americans, and he goes out of his way to try to applaud those adverse reactions, it makes people stop and think and ask what's going on there. So it doesn't help his case that nothing's going on between him and Russia. And you know, at this point, we got to, as usual, we keep going back to this Russia thing.
And I think it's kind of a distraction. I think there's better things for us to worry about, but it is concerning. Absolutely. So man, I should have thanks to me to think that again, we don't want to go in, you know, down a rabbit hole of Russia without, you know, letting the evidence be the first because I think that was set up liberals and Democrats and all the like.
It will expose and it would allow for a combat if that does occur. So I think that definitely the investigation precede, you know, we had Paul Manafort last month, or was put yesterday, but occurred last month, where his house was raided by the FBI. So the case is picking up, the case is going somewhere. We just have to let it take us there versus dragging it to a place that it may not go.
So I definitely agree that we should wait and let, you know, that first happen. So let's talk about the other side of the aisle because it's interesting that Democrats can be struggling with the current situation that we have. We have a president that is pulling, I think, it's believed between the low 30s to mid 30s, they say they gave him 30% this week. But why do you think that Democrats are still struggling to get their message on board, to get people to buy in to their point platform?
Well, so in regards to the Democrats, their message is not, it's not a good message of what I saw. They're mainly saying vote for us. We're not Donald Trump. And at this point in time, that's not a good message.
And what I think, what they're trying to do, you know, they're trying to turn it around. But at this time, we need to show people, Democrats need to show people what they're for, rather than who they're against. And if it's just against the president, that may not necessarily get them votes unless the people, unless American people are going to actually want to vote a referendum against Donald Trump, which I think at this point in time, it's too early and too close to want to try to do that. And so, Democrats need to have people vote for them on the merits of what they're going to do for people and be the counterweight to what the GOP is doing right now for the people.
So, you know, healthcare is always a good thing to talk about, as well as jobs and infrastructure. Those are things that, you know, the Democrats need to talk about, and they have been talking about it, but they haven't been focusing on it. And those are the things that they need to focus on. If they want to get the vote out, and even to the point of if they want to change people's minds on whether, you know, who they want to vote for, you need to let them, let the people know that you're going to vote.
You're going to support them and the things that they're for, which at this point in time, healthcare, you know, healthcare jobs and their own personal economy. So, they, this is a good time because Donald Trump's campaign, I mean, sorry, Donald Trump's White House is not doing good. So, they have everything to gain from running smart campaigns where they show people what they can do for them. Absolutely.
So, that's my quorum with the Democrats. I agree with that. I have a little bit of a modification. One of the main of that is that the Democrats have this notion, not this notion, but they seem to have a perceived narrative that they are afraid to fight with what they believe in.
They're always willing to butch or to negotiate. And the thing that people, at least in Obama's years, did it for the Republican Party, was that Republicans gave from the Gulf. We're trying to make your one-time president. We're trying to stop you along the way, everything that we can.
And we're basically going to issue it, 90% of the other things that you do. And the base, the Republican base fully bought into that regardless of the actual regardless of the, if the possibility of this can happen, it was merely the rhetoric that occurred that gave them that opportunity to win the House and now to win the Senate. Because if you look at the biggest scope of the Democrats, right, since 2008, when they had everything, at least in the federal level, they had the presidency, the House and the Senate. And you now look at 2017 where they have lost the, the, the, uh, presidency, they have lost the Senate, they have lost the House.
You have 31 governors who have an arch attached to their name. You have local states who also have Republican majorities in the legislative branch as well. So Democrats have lost a lot of ground. And I believe that the part of that is because their base is not energized, their base is not there.
Not because, not because they can't motivate it. But no, because they don't have anything to get motivated behind. Right? Because if you look at who's on the full runners in the Democrats.
You have matching voters, you have Bernie Sanders, you have familiar Harris, you have maybe a little bit of Warren. But it, the bench is not deep. You don't have that firebrand like a Republican party does. Let me get an example of that firebrand.
I'm gonna talk about it. I'm gonna play a clip, excuse me, from Maxine Waters, with her exchange with the Trish Chteri and how she continues to come in as a session with, uh, reclaim my time. I was gonna answer that. Just go straight to him.
Mr. Chairman, I thought when you read the rules, you acknowledged that I shouldn't be interrupted. And I would have reclaimed my time. What he failed to tell you was when you're on my time, I can reclaim it.
I left that out, so I've reclaimed my time. Please, will you respond to the question of why I did not get a response to my colleagues to the May 23rd letter? Well, I was gonna tell you my response. Just tell me.
Okay. So first of all, okay. Let me just say that the Department of Treasury has cooperated extensively with the Senate Intel Committee, with the House Intel Committee. Claiming my time, reclaiming my time, reclaiming my time, reclaiming my time, reclaiming my time.
Secretary, the time belongs to the General Lady from California. So that was just a little bit of her, and that's how she became an Internet sensation. She continues to become an Internet sensation rather. But people like that.
That's the kind of thing that people, I talked to other liberals, are a progressive. They want that. They want that firebrand. And do you think that that is something that the Democrat Party needs to do?
Or do they need to continue to try to appease our appeal to some of those Trump voters who may not be as committed to Trump as others might be? Well, so I saw that clip and I enjoyed it myself. But on the cross end, you know, with the confirmation hearings and how all these senators came out to the forefront, you know, this before, and I'll franken, how franken came out. It was good stuff and I enjoyed watching those things.
But in the long run, it did not change who came, who was nominated, who was appointed to those positions. But it was good. I wholeheartedly enjoyed it. Now, being combative is, in my opinion, one of the problems of what is happening in the government right now is that everyone's being really combative and not more so in public trying to work together.
And while we enjoy that drama that we saw, it may not come to a conclusive way for Democrats to look for it. Yes, they become, you know, in the sensations. Did they then on the cross end become leaders in the Democratic Party? And I would say that that's not necessarily true.
You know, we have Bernie Sanders got a list before him, Kamala Harris, Maxi Waters, and they put Alfred in there, but Alfred in there. Okay. But yeah, it's not deep. But, you know, they really need to do some more soul searching.
I think they really come out with some real good speaking points to how they're going to change America for the better. And I think Americans will respond to that. And I think the biggest thing to get people to go to the polls to vote is that Donald Trump is in office. And people are going to be laughing days more lazy and not going to vote for, you know, just for that.
I think it's really hard to get them to vote on for anything, any other thing. Yeah, and you have a great point. That's one of the things that I wanted to hit on was that when you look at the polling, let's go back to 2016 election. That was the problem that Democrats had when I was talking last night with some of our coworkers.
It was, why did Democrats lose Donald Trump? Let's jump forward to this poll right quick to see an end poll. It just came out and look at his approval rates for the time right now. He's sitting at 38%.
He's never broken above 45%. It tripled from 44 to 45, 25, but then he's back at 38. Before then, it was, you know, usually those kind of strokes. So how do the Democrats lose to someone who is polling so low?
And that is why I look at who, not only who became the candidate, but how that person became the candidate because Hillary Clinton, we have to, at some point, he's not going to go out there. She will not be the candidate. I think that if you put up anybody else from the Democratic Party, you put up a little more. You put up acting more like even, of course, Bernie Sanders, they would have beat Donald Trump.
But instead, the DNC with Hillary Clinton. So you have to also remember that during the primaries, it was shown that the DNC had tilted for Hillary Clinton. You will see in the primary and these races that Bernie Sanders would come out with victories, but yet somehow end up with less delegates, another couple of super-dellies. So, on top of the fact that you already have independents who are iffy on Clinton, you also have now the Democrats, the base, who also feel it sour because they feel like they achieved it.
Because they feel like they had a vote. It was already fixed. It was already rigged towards that direction. And that in combination with independents, not really feeling Hillary Clinton, made a president Trump.
And I think the DNC needs to acknowledge that. I think the DNC needs to stop attacking. And my purview is attacking the left. We had it now where there are still attacking Bernie Sanders.
They're still attacking people who are not committed to the Senate or to the establishment. Some people are questioning whether Kamil Harris is really a part of the progressive movement or she somewhat like Clinton. And in return, you have the establishment media, the middle media, also attacking left as well. And that's not really helping.
So, do you think that Democrats need to stay towards the middle? Again, in a hope to get the Trump supporter, to get those independents, or they need to go towards a love, go towards the Bernie Sanders camp, so to activate that base, to get them to come out and vote, so that they will be motivated to stay at those polls? So, one of the great things about Democratic Party, I think, is that it's a party of all types of different people and different groups. Now, with that difference, there's going to be a whole bunch of differences of the ins of how the party should go.
I think for one thing is the Democrats have shown the central part of the Democrats. They have shown a lack of care, I want to say, in regards to the liberals. And I think that they kind of underestimate that voting power, that the liberal bloc has, and that was to their detriment in 2016. And I think that what the Democratic Party really needs to do is to come together, first and foremost, so that the Democratic Party can get power.
Now, who the leadership should be and how they should incorporate the liberal left? I'm not for sure how that's going to go. I think the liberal left is real salty, and they have rightly so to be salty. But it's up to that central bloc, the leadership there, to include them.
And I think that Bernie Sanders is a good elite for that liberal bloc, and many people identify with him, and know once they follow his brand of populism. And I think that if we can get behind that, at least that conciousism, then I think that that would go a long way in getting them on a path to taking back House Senate. And eventually, the White House. Yeah, I think that those are the viewpoints.
My message to the Democratic Party would be that Trump supporters aren't voting for you. You can try as you might, to appeal to them, you can try as you might to put their mind in ease about socialism and about anything else. But they are not going to vote. I think his base has to maybe shift it from 85% to maybe 80% to anything that has happened in the last six months.
His base is his base. You need to work on your base. You need to work on minority votes. You need to work on black votes.
Black women in particular, there's a source that you are leaving on tax. You need to pull in, like I said, the American Harris, the Maxine Waters, pull them off them in so you can get them out of their base. I can assure you, if Michelle Obama will run, and I pretty got it, maybe something will make her run, she would win hand down bar nine. I would wait at a poll till two a.m.
in the morning, so I can put a check by her name, but you need people to feel that sort of way towards your candidate. People are going to feel that kind of way towards Hillary Clinton. And so you had a combination of, I really don't trust Hillary Clinton, but I don't like them at all. But being people that she's going to win anyway.
So now, why am I standing out somewhere? Why don't want to be a vote somebody that I don't really like? And the thing that I'm assuming that she's going to win anyway. And that would happen.
I think that for the African American vote, it dropped off by like 12% from the Obama presidency or Obama voting. So you can, you can activate that base again. You just have to give it candidate that people can gather around and relevant. And give a message, like you said, a message that people can actually believe in and go towards.
The poll right now shows that Democrats are struggling to find a message. More people believe that the Democrats are anti-Trump than currently anything else. So that's what you need to pull from. You need to give, I'm forward.
If you throw a $15 middle wage, then then be forward. Stand up for it. But don't be trying to go halfway in it. If you don't get behind Bernie Sanders, you know Bernie Sanders won't.
You won't single pay her. So if that's a system that you believe will work, then in fact, that's a system. Fuck this. Well, you know, yes, I don't think Obama cares really works as well as he could.
But we can fix it. We should repeal it. No, you won't think that go towards single payer. They have five-years-old payer.
Stop trying to meet in a middle ground with a Republican base that wants to get rid of that system altogether. They don't want to find a middle, they go to repeal. So Democrats need to huddle around a candidate that is black-able, that is relatable, that actually people can believe in. And then a message that people can't dedicate themselves to and can hold themselves around.
And I think that until the Democrats do that, those combination of things, they need to be lost in the woods. Because you've tried to hold them on the center and they're not going to activate anybody. People might not believe in Bernie Sanders. I'm not going to be biased to Bernie Sanders.
But people, even when I was talking about conservative down-numbers who still don't put all the Trump, they admit that I will give a pulse. I might think about voting for Bernie Sanders, not because I like him per se, but I know that he's honest and I know I can rely on what he believes in. He's a Democratic socialist, so I know what I'm buying him is. I can trust that.
So why do you think Democrats are still not voting? They're still attacking Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders is holding at 80-some percent of who will be right now. And they're attacking him.
Why do you think that is? Well, so what I think is happening is that the leadership in the Democratic Party, I don't think they control Bernie Sanders. It's brand of liberalism. It doesn't mesh well, I think, with how they want the party to go.
Because they do have a lot of money in their coffers from businesses and stuff. Bernie Sanders doesn't look or even want to be a part of that. He wants to really do things that help people, you know, with single-payer healthcare, with paying for extended education, higher education, and really things that don't necessarily go well for businesses and allowed businesses are paying, you know, or paying Democrats to go for. And really, in all honesty, if we as left many people want our party back, we need to make our voices heard at the vote.
If we're not necessarily voting for central Democrats, then we might need to vote for that third party on the left. Exactly. And they need to vote for those outliers that can really get the leadership in the Democratic Party to say, hey, well, they've got some voting power. We've got to tap into that.
I think we as American people, we have to motivate ourselves now. The whole power of the Democrats get us motivated. I'm thinking that right now that the Democrats are going to get us motivated for the community. Right now, I need to motivate myself and motivate the people that are in my spirit of influence to get out there and vote.
And that then sends a message to Democrats, hey, these people are here voting. We need to do something for them and then show them what's good. I think that our vote needs to be our message to them. And they, like you said, they don't need to take it for granted that the historical groups that vote for them are still going to vote for them.
The one thing that made me sad about the 2016 election was Donald Trump had a lot of votes for him. And yes, he's the president here like why, why he's saying it like that. But overwhelmingly, a lot of white people voted for him, but they were black people that voted for him. They were Hispanic people that voted for him.
They were Asian people that voted for him thinking that he was going to do something for them. And when on the outside, he was saying things that went against what they wanted for their life. And that made me sad. But the next those run off elections for to replace the people that Donald Trump pulled to be in his house, they were casting and pulled it off.
I know these districts are heavily red, but I still believe that there are enough Democrats in these districts. Even though they're heavily red, there's enough Democrats in those districts to change the blue. I agree. And I think that again, that's why the Democrats don't think they understand just how complex situations they're in.
Because I fully believe that Bernie Sanders, I don't know why he doesn't do it. But Bernie Sanders went third party, a big chunk of the Democratic base will leave, really leave, have more problems even, and going. You will get other points, you'll get the Democratic socialists of America. That point is exploding as well.
The Green Party is also going. They went weird, but they went just doing it. But if you look at that, Democrats, I think it's now like, 6 out of 10, 7 out of 10, liberals of the rest of do not like identifying themselves as Democrats. They will really identify themselves as liberals of progressives.
That's because they don't identify themselves with the party. So again, you have to get back into that base and get them energized enough to your right-grounded vote. But that also being said is that the citizens themselves have to go out and vote. We cannot allow for what happened in 2016 when we came in and placed it.
And just like, oh, she's going to win at the last point. What's the point going out there? The point going out there is that, yes, you're not only going from the president, but you're also going for the senators, for House of Senators, for people all down the ticket. And those people are having more, really, impact, especially when you get out of state, the state level of the vote on your life than the president does.
So yes, it's just a presidency. But also give attention to your senator, your teacher to your house member, give attention to your governor, give attention to your state legislators, because those people will have a more impact, like, guaranteed, a more impact on your life than the president from, ever will. So you have to pay more attention to these racist duties, elections, and to these candidates. Because if a Democrat, and what I do want to say, we need a better party because we need to break up the two-party system, but I'm hoping that in 2018 that we do have a Democratic Senate, a Republican Senate more than a House to slow down some of the stuff that is going on, because they have a traffic right now.
And soon if they continue, they're going to have a bigger hand in choosing the judge for the Supreme Court, which also has an impact. So you would need to, as liberals, the rest of the populace, whatever you want to envelope yourself into, that's against Trump, rather than a message, and a candidate that actually will galvanize people. And I think Democrats need to do this quickly, because they keep losing, people are going to say, why am I being a Democrat? Why am I going to keep losing?
What's the whole point? Right? And a bunch of people don't like two places to meet. I think 60% of Americans prefer a third party to an urge.
Hopefully, the Democrats will get their message together before a data party. It gets broken up. And so that's definitely something that needs to happen and needs to occur. But in your case, one last question, one last thought.
With all the recent news that came out again from North Korea, do you think that Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump are going to make themselves, or talk themselves, into a war? Or do you think that they're going to somebody, whether it's in Donald Trump, or whether it's China and Russia, if Kim Jong-un is going to tell these two to slow back and to pull back? Well, so, so, so, this situation is so crazy. And I think people thought, no, when Donald Trump is going to be president, that this would be the scenario that we're at.
That we don't, Donald Trump is going to take us to a war that we can't get out of. But I think what we have to remember and realize is that Donald Trump is not leaving the vacuum. He may be the voice for air, but he's not coming back. So I think with his chief of staff, chief of staff, that we got some type of shackle in place that might hold him off from doing something entirely not smart.
I think right now, a lot of posturing is his, it is almost there. I was there. There's a lot of, there's a lot of posturing. And his, on his side now, in regards to North Korea, I think right now, if we look at history, whenever the dictator gave up his weapons, he was not long for having power in office.
So I'm not so sure that I can give up his weapons just yet, but I think what we may see is that it builds up a point in that it'll come down. And I, right now, I don't know for sure if there's going to be something where, you know, that red line in saying that Donald Trump has a Twitter drawn or, you know, the press conference is drawn is going to go through. But I feel like he has built himself into a corner that Congress and his chief of staff will probably make him some stuff. So I agree.
I don't think we'll go to a war with Korea and like everyone is saying that if they start popping off, it's going to be a draft for you. And I don't think that's the best outcome. And I think a lot of people think that's not home as well. And so I hope, through heads with the bell, but if we allow for another country, Russia, China, to take a lead role in, you know, the S.
And I'm waiting for all this winning that he told us. I'm waiting for it. And winning a war is not the way that I'm ready to accept. So I don't think we'll go to a war, but no, Donald Trump is president.
So we still have to make it happen. Do you remember that? Yeah. So yeah, I think that's the reason I said the top.
I think that neither one really wants to go to war. They're just flying off the mouth. But eventually I do think that if they continue down his rhetoric, if no Korea talks about it, they're going to file a bomb in the end. President Trump is going to say that if you continue to threaten us, you're going to see a fine theory that you've never seen in this war, that's a 14-year life, that language gets you passed a red line.
And like you said, foreign policy should not be dictated on Twitter, but 141 characters. These are actions. I mean, these are words that may have actions and may have a meaningful impact. The fact that you don't, when President Trump is now going around fighting that, we've upgraded that.
He upgraded our arsenal. It's just a flat line, by the way. This just, this just got part of when it was in the first order. So no, he didn't do that.
Two, it was always started by President Obama. And in three, it takes years to upgrade our arsenal, not six months. We have 6,000, again, 6,000 missiles. So that made up we upgraded 1,000 missiles a month.
That didn't happen. That's just, because we played that panel right quick. But you know what, that stuff off. When you're trying to diffuse a situation with more career.
And this kind of language is not helpful. So I agree, Aaron, I think that hopefully somebody in his cabinet, that will tone him down. That will tell him to stop going off script because the fire crew thinks completely off script and tell him that your words have a whole lot of meaning. So you need to phrase them and consider them carefully.
But always sir, thank you for being part of the show. You know we love how you're on and we get to see you hopefully on a more regular basis. So, until next time sir, you'll be easy. Yeah, as well.
Peace. Alright, so thank you again as always for being a part of the show. We really do appreciate you being on. We appreciate hearing your endeavors and hearing your thoughts.
So please feel free to comment on the stuff below. I'll have a video below. Also, I'll have a video below. Also, I'll have a video below.
Also, I'll have a video below because starring is going to be doing a push to 1,000 likes. We're going to be promoting heavily and hopefully each of you will be a part of that and by into that as well. So feel free to share the video and everything as well. Also, feel free to check us out all these posts below.
You follow me on Twitter. Michael Crapel, who is a Trump supporter. A anti-Trump supporter. Seeing a Trump advisor.
Actually, he likes me. I'm shocked by that. And again, I am taking a fact that Twitter doesn't want to verify me. That's something that's irritating.
It's conspiracy. But make sure that you follow us on Twitter as well. Follow us on Facebook and also check out our YouTube soundcloud and iTunes. And also, excuse me, if you want to be on the show, that could be done.
All you've got to do is email us at powertothepeopleforchange.com. VMS also on Facebook if you want to. And you could be on the show in real time given us your take. So, until then, until next week, again, make sure to check us out on our social media sites.
Make sure to check us out next Thursday, 8pm. And we also have a special episode for next Friday when Patrick Kamao is a top 10 DMV model.