Episode 3: Modern Equity and Its Maxims

In this concluding episode of Module 1, Dr Sarah McKibbin and student co-host Jennifer Beaumont tackle the ongoing debates that shape modern equity and introduce the timeless principles that guide equitable decision-making.This episode explores:The fusion debate: Are equity and the common law truly separate streams, or should they blend? Discover why this 150-year-old question still matters in today's courtsThe fusion fallacy: Learn why Australian courts reject New Zealand's more integrated approach, and what this means for legal practiceModern applications: See equity's maxims in action through contemporary cases such as X v Twitter, Black Uhlans, and Maguire v MakaronisCourse roadmap: Preview how the historical foundations connect to upcoming topics: estoppel, fiduciary duties, trusts, and equitable remediesGuiding principles: Master the equitable maxims that can be used as thinking tools: 'equity acts in personam', 'clean hands', and 'equity will not suffer a wrong without a remedy'Practical wisdom: Understand why these ancient principles arguably remain relevant for modern legal problemsThis episode bridges historical understanding with contemporary practice, preparing you for advanced study of specific equitable doctrines.Key pointsDuration: 33:49Content: Suitable for legal education and professional developmentFormat: Educational dialogue with modern case examples and practical applicationsHosted by Dr Sarah McKibbin with student co-host Jennifer BeaumontProduced by Dr Sarah McKibbin for the University of Southern QueenslandPost-production editing by Ben Meares