EPISODE · Nov 1, 2024 · 40 MIN
Episode 384 - OADC Weekly Case Law Update
from OADC Weekly Case Law Update
This podcast covers case summaries distributed on 10/18/2024 and 10/25/2024 Cases and Keywords with timestamps: (02:51) UNPUBLISHED People v. Avila, 22CA0875 (October 3, 2024); Evidence of touch DNA excluded under Rape Shield Statute. (06:10) UNPUBLISHED People v. Salazar, 21CA0949 (October 17, 2024); Errors in instructions not plain because the error wasn't obvious at the time of trial. (07:21) UNPUBLISHED People v. Ladd, 22CA1212 (October 17, 2024); Reversal required where juror expressed that he would use defendant's silence to infer guilt was empaneled on the jury that convicted defendant. (08:51) UNPUBLISHED People v. Sanchez, 22CA1066 (October 24, 2024); Restitution vacated where losses where associated with dismissed counts and defendant never agreed to pay restitution on dismissed counts. (10:32) UNPUBLISHED People v. Salaz, 22CA1193 (October 24, 2024); Restitution for older technology should be based on fair market value, not replacement value. (12:11) UNPUBLISHED People v. Jamison, 23CA1113 (October 24, 2024); Court should hold restitution hearing for defendant when requested when defendant's counsel appears but defendant does not. (13:50) UNPUBLISHED People v. Fletcher, 22CA1269 (October 24, 2024); Invited error doctrine for requested jury instruction meant defendant could not appeal that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. (16:51) UNPUBLISHED People v. Castorena, 22CA1591 (October 24, 2024); The district court reversibly erred by denying Castorena's motion to suppress a witness's out-of-court identification of him as the shooter. (23:04) UNPUBLISHED People v. Woodruff, 22CA1728 (October 24, 2024); Evidence excluded as self-serving hearsay should have been admitted as prior inconsistent statements, Prosecutorial misconduct. Links: U.S. v. Harper https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/a1660d00-3cb2-4a40-8f80-1a9617d29222.pdf?rdr=true R21 In re: Westminster v. Camp, 2024SA276 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/32cc3cbc-c6cd-44b9-a1f8-709f7bc6d138.pdf?rdr=true ACLU Petition for Habeas in Lopez v. Lucero https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/a8ad4d08-5bfc-4c1a-851e-1eac24a0debd.pdf?rdr=true In re. P. v. Gregg Order https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/7fa76800-ccad-4711-90a6-0735e6611336.pdf?rdr=true P. v. Gregg, Rule 21 Petition 10.7.24 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/7e6ff6ec-37ce-4be8-bc6b-3d5fc8d2d45c.pdf?rdr=true In re. Mercy Housing Management Group v. Bermudez, 2024 CO 68 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/c585637f-2aca-4033-9350-94fec3b558d7.pdf?rdr=true UNPUBLISHED People v. Sanchez, 22CA1066 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/dd55c2f6-4a8a-46ed-8dc0-787a5bc9f85e.pdf?rdr=true UNPUBLISHED People v. Salaz, 22CA1193 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/a868bee2-9688-4655-af07-ddf8c5adb9bb.pdf?rdr=true UNPUBLISHED People v. Jamison, 23CA1113 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/516ef51d-1979-4a1c-8f98-78a1ec9b3623.pdf?rdr=true UNPUBLISHED People v. Fletcher, 22CA1269 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/dff520c4-a7f9-4776-bc70-6bbc249c7ce1.pdf?rdr=true UNPUBLISHED People v. Castorena, 22CA1591 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/63ba651f-6fec-4398-95cd-fe49d92afd87.pdf?rdr=true UNPUBLISHED People v. Woodruff, 22CA1728 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/a4eacf32-df66-4b8c-91d8-99a496fe418e.pdf?rdr=true CCDB Nominating Com info session 11 20 2024 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/e34552f9-4668-44b8-9e67-415dcf0e8fb5.docx?rdr=true Victory Newsletter 43 of 2024 https://files.constantcontact.com/45bb5db5401/b916c8ea-3217-4302-861b-54c33c4ea264.pdf?rdr=true Glossip v Oklahoma https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/22-7466?utm_source=arguments-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2024-10-17&utm_content=text-oyez-case-5 Contact Shawndell Irving here: Shawndell Irving Music by Scott Holmes. Used under a Creative Commons license. Download today's music at: http://freemusicarchive.org/ NOTE regarding unpublished Colorado Court of Appeals opinions: Please remember the Court of Appeals Policy states that the citation of unpublished opinions in the Court of Appeals is forbidden, with limited exceptions. Copies of unpublished opinions are provided for private use and are not to be included in an electronic database or otherwise published. Also, please note that you are free to cite unpublished cases in the district court for whatever persuasive value the judge may give them. Patterson v. James, 2018 COA 173, ¶¶ 40-43. You may request unpublished cases from the COA at http://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_Of_Appeals/Opinion_Request.cfm
Embed this episode
Ready to play
Episode 384 - OADC Weekly Case Law Update
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.