Episode 56.5 | Not as Done as We Thought We Are

We finished the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (but for real this time)   * What’s the importance of not driving a wedge between the authority of Christ and the authority of Scripture? * Does the exposition solve the apparent “language and communication problem”? * How can one slip out of the analogy of faith and into explaining away verses with other verses? * What should we do if we find ourselves ascribing sin to people following previous revelation? * How does the Iowancap principle of “convenient enemies” converge with the problem of apparent evangelical identity while methodologically abandoning evangelical principles? Links: Defending Inerrancy (main link) Explaining Inerrancy Updating the Chicago Statement--TGC Leave a comment at [email protected] Support us at buymeacoffee.com/Flyover Follow Iowancap on Twitter Follow Jeff Leave a comment at [email protected] Support us at buymeacoffee.com/Flyover