Episode 596 - Should Government Fund Science - Interview with Terence Kealey

For decades, we've been told that scientific progress depends on government funding. But what if that assumption is wrong? In this episode, Ron and Ed welcome Dr. Terence Kealey—physician, biochemist, former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Buckingham, and Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute—to explore one of the most controversial questions in science and public policy. Drawing on his research and books The Economic Laws of Scientific Research and Sex, Science and Profits, Kealey argues that markets, private institutions, and the scientific community itself are more than capable of driving innovation without government direction. The conversation examines the economics of scientific discovery, the incentives created by public funding, the role of universities, and whether today's research ecosystem encourages breakthrough innovation or bureaucratic conformity. Whether you agree with Kealey's conclusions or not, his arguments challenge deeply held assumptions about how knowledge advances and who should pay for it. If you've ever wondered whether science flourishes because of government—or despite it—this episode will give you plenty to think about. Guest Bio Dr. Terence Kealey is a British physician, biochemist, and economist of science. He served as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Buckingham from 2001 to 2014 and previously lectured in clinical biochemistry at the University of Cambridge. Now an Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute, he is the author of The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, Sex, Science and Profits, and numerous works examining the relationship between scientific innovation, markets, and public policy.