Episode 99: Ford v. Harman: A NatSec Debate episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 29, 2021 · 36 MIN

Episode 99: Ford v. Harman: A NatSec Debate

from Fault Lines

Fault Lines welcomes Dr. Christopher Ford, author of the recent NSI paper "Principled Conservatism in America’s Foreign Affairs and National Security Policy", and former U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, Distinguished Fellow and President Emerita at the Wilson Center, and author of the book, "Insanity Defense: Why Our Failure to Confront Hard National Security Problems Makes Us Less Safe," to discuss the intersection between different views of national security. How do we get Americans back to a point of embracing free trade? What is the best function of multilateral institutions? What could a bipartisan national security policy look like? These questions and more are covered in this week’s episode of Fault Lines.If you like what we're doing, be sure to like, rate, and subscribe to Fault Lines. If you have ideas for future episodes, be sure to email us at [email protected] or tweet us at @MasonNatSec.Next week is our 100th episode of Fault Lines! Keep an eye on social media and our website for some fun ways to engage with our podcast team before we record the extra special episode. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 29, 2021

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Episode 99: Ford v. Harman: A NatSec Debate

0:00 36:52

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Fault Lines?

This episode is 36 minutes long.

When was this Fault Lines episode published?

This episode was published on September 29, 2021.

Can I download this Fault Lines episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!