EPISODE · Aug 19, 2026 · 17 MIN
ERA Was Supposed to Improve Embryo Transfers—Could It Actually Make Them Worse?
from Taco Bout Fertility Tuesday · host Mark Amols, MD
Send us Fan MailDoes the ERA test actually improve your chance of pregnancy with IVF—or has endometrial receptivity testing been oversold?Patients often receive completely different advice. Some fertility specialists say the Endometrial Receptivity Analysis, or ERA, can identify a personalized window of implantation. Others say research has proven the test does not work. The truth is more complicated.In this episode, Dr. Mark Amols revisits ERA in light of newer randomized trials, meta-analyses, and research on recurrent implantation failure. He also examines statements from his earlier episodes—including why he would no longer confidently tell patients that an ERA “cannot hurt.”Topics include:How ERA attempts to identify the window of implantationWhether ERA improves live-birth rates during routine IVF treatmentWhat the major randomized trial actually foundWhether that trial was adequately poweredWhy the data do not support ERA before a routine or first embryo transferThe unresolved role of ERA after recurrent implantation failureWhy results differ between untested and euploid embryo transfersWhether changing transfer timing could potentially lower successConcerns about test accuracy and cycle-to-cycle endometrial variabilityWhen ERA might still be discussed as an optional, unproven interventionThe current evidence is reasonably clear for the average IVF patient: routine ERA testing does not improve live birth. For patients with repeated implantation failure—particularly after failed euploid embryo transfers—the answer remains uncertain because the adequately powered randomized trial needed to settle the question has not yet been completed.This episode separates what ERA has been proven to do, what it has been proven not to do, and what fertility medicine still does not know.Thanks for tuning in to another episode of 'Taco Bout Fertility Tuesday' with Dr. Mark Amols. If you found this episode insightful, please share it with friends and family who might benefit from our discussion. Remember, your feedback is invaluable to us – leave us a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred listening platform.Stay connected with us for updates and fertility tips – follow us on Facebook. For more resources and information, visit our website at www.NewDirectionFertility.com.Have a question or a topic you'd like us to cover? We'd love to hear from you! Reach out to us at [email protected] us next Tuesday for more discussions on fertility, where we blend medical expertise with a touch of humor to make complex topics accessible and engaging. Until then, keep the conversation going and remember: understanding your fertility is a journey we're on together.
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Send us Fan Mail Does the ERA test actually improve your chance of pregnancy with IVF—or has endometrial receptivity testing been oversold? Patients often receive completely different advice. Some fertility specialists say the Endometrial Receptivity Analysis, or ERA, can identify a personalized window of implantation. Others say research has proven the test does not work. The truth is more complicated. In this episode, Dr. Mark Amols revisits ERA in light of newer randomized trials, meta-ana...
NOW PLAYING
ERA Was Supposed to Improve Embryo Transfers—Could It Actually Make Them Worse?
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.