EPISODE · May 30, 2020 · 13 MIN
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society
This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case. To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.
What this episode covers
This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case. To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.
NOW PLAYING
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.