Hello and welcome to the Vergast, the flagship podcast of automatic reading recordings. I'm your friend David Pierce, and today on the show we're going to talk about wearables. Specifically, these wearables that are just constantly recording you, recording your meetings, recording your conversations, in some cases recording everything you do all of the time. There's a question about what recording means, what they're doing with these recordings, where they're storing these recordings, and how we as people feel being the ones doing the recording or the ones on the other end. The Verge's V-song has been covering all of these devices, including a pair of meta-glasses that have no camera that I'm totally fascinated by.
She's going to come on, we're going to try to figure out what to make with all of these new devices. But first, here's everything else happening on the Verge today. I'm Travis Larchak, and this is 90 seconds on the Verge for Thursday, October 15th, 2026. Pre-orders for the highly anticipated folding iPhone duo start tomorrow, but pre-pre-orders are already happening. Apple is letting customers pick out their phone, submit their payment information, basically everything up to actually pressing the buy button, which will go live tomorrow morning.
And good luck beating all of the AI agents who will also be trying to buy the phone. Speaking of AI, OpenAI promised it won't use hardware secrets it allegedly got from some of its employees who used to work at Apple. This is the latest turn in a lawsuit Apple filed against OpenAI back in July. OpenAI made this agreement shortly after a US District Judge signaled that he was highly likely to grant an injunction, forcing them to do it anyway. Meanwhile, OpenAI is accusing one of their former employees of sharing confidential files with Apple.
Look at it this way, the way things are headed with always listening wearable devices, soon none of us will have secrets. Speaking of secrets, the Verge is Sean Hollister reported today on security vulnerabilities a researcher found with a cute little AI pet called Elico. The toy is made by a company called Energize Labs, and apparently it transcribed millions of conversations left completely unprotected. And it turns out the company was literally profiling its customers based on those conversations. One customer was described as having difficulty trusting family members.
And after this, that customer's trust issues will only continue. You can read more at the Verge.com. That's 90 seconds on the Verge for Thursday, October 15th, 2026. Support for the show comes from Sonos. Most of us here at the Verge are big movie buffs.
When watching at home, I don't want that experience to be any less immersive than it would be in a theater. And Sound plays a huge role in that. The Verge has actually published a few pieces over the years about how much Sound Matters do movie. From headphones to sound bars, a Sonos system pulls you in. So far, you might actually think the phone call is coming from inside the house.
Visit Sonos.com and build your system. Sonos love the sound, feel the system. Support for the show comes from Ring. Whatever shows up around your home this holiday season with Ring, you're protected. Ring makes it easier than ever to keep track of all those packages on your doorstep.
With Battery Doorbell 2K Plus featuring retinal 2K clarity and up to six times enhanced zoom. Get a closer look without sacrificing detail. The versatile compact indoor cam makes it easy to check on the inside of your home and your pets when you're out. An outdoor cam plus lets you keep an eye on your yard and outdoor spaces right from your phone. With Ring, you're protected for the holidays, shop cameras, doorbells, and more at Ring.com.
With all of the gadgets you're currently wearing. I have the RayDann Meta Audio. I have a .com G7 CGM. I have the Apple Watch Series 12. I have the Fitbit Edge and that's like four.
Four today. Kind of a late day for you, honestly. Yeah, I have my Aura Ring charging at the moment, so that's why I'm not wearing that. So, you know, I'm sure the commenters will be like, oh my God, she's falling off. But it's, I honestly, three to five is normal for baby's days.
So, yeah. I'm glad to hear it. Well, another time I want to talk about the Fitbit Edge because it runs right into a bunch of the stuff we've been talking about in a way that I think is fascinating. But for today, there's two devices and one theme that I want to talk about, which is a thing that you've been covering a lot. And I think the place to start here is with the glasses on your face, the RayDann Meta Audio, which are, as I understand, just the Meta RayBands minus the camera is essentially what Meta went to do here.
Yes. I am fascinated by the sheer fact that these glasses exist at all, that Meta is even willing to make a pair of glasses like this. As it goes harder and harder in smart glasses, it is like pivoting a lot of its strategy around this as the hardware play, the fact that it is willing to make a pair of glasses without a camera at all strikes me as fascinating. What do you make of the fact that these even exist? Well, the timing is very funny because we've just had this summer of backlash against the MetaSmart glasses.
Perfect. However, you want to call them all their various, whether it's Meta RayBand or RayBand Meta, all of the camera equipped glasses displayed on display. A lot of people had big feelings about them over this last summer. Have you noticed Pervert Glasses as a phrase going totally mainstream, by the way? Yes.
At least among everyone I know, Pervert Glasses is now just a phrase people say. Yeah, it's the new Glassel. We've retired Glassel and we've gone to Pervert Glass glasses. That was a big theme over the past summer. These glasses coming out, Sans camera, it feels like a very convenient timing, right?
Even though when I went to Connect and I talked to Alex Hemmel, who is their VP of Wearables, he was like, these have been in the works for two years because that's the typical product timeline. They said that early on the audio capabilities, they had underestimated how much people would like just the fact that these could be a pair of discrete, open-ear headphones. They had underestimated that and the fact that when you omit the camera, you open it up to a lot of different styles that can be a little less chunky, so to speak. These are particularly, it doesn't have my prescription in it, otherwise it would be chunky no matter what with my prescription.
These have a wire frame on the bottom. None of the smart glasses thus far from that have the ability to have a wire frame in any capacity just because of how much tech needs to go into the frame itself. If you look at the temple, they're a lot thinner than the typical meta glasses are. Yeah, I would actually put them closer. On the spectrum between a normal pair of glasses and the normal meta-ray bands, I would put these closer to regular glasses.
Yeah. They're a huge leap forward in looking good on your face. Exactly. That's kind of their whole push with this particular pair of glasses is that at Connect, they had said that Muse, our cute little dystopian friend Muse is coming to all of the glasses. That would include these ostensibly.
Right now, it's not on there, but the idea is that, okay, you have people who are now very conveniently, even though that wasn't their intent creeped out by a camera, but you can still have a very powerful AI agent embedded into it. It's more fashionable looking. It's more discreet. So, you get people to interact with Muse maybe a bit more if you stuff it in a pair of glasses like these without the camera. It's a little bit nerfed as to what you can do with AI.
Some people will be appreciative of that. There are definitely people who would be like, well, why omit the camera at all? This is now a useless pair of glasses. There's points. I categorically do not agree with the people who say it's nerfed by not having a camera.
Like A, we're at a point right now with so many of these AI tools where the visual intelligence stuff they do is not that good. And B, you have a phone. The I need you to take a picture of something problem is solved. We have the technology for taking a picture of something. And actually, that's a much better way to solve this problem if you ask me because I can point my phone at something and take a picture.
And I can tell you what matters by pointing my camera at it. Whereas saying we're going to have this camera on that's looking at everything all the time and we're going to figure out what's important, it doesn't work. It doesn't work. And so to me the idea of having no camera and then when I need to take a picture, I can. I would argue is actually a better user experience for most people.
Not being able to take hands free pictures is something and there are people who like doing that and I think that's great. But as an AI tool, I'm not bothered at all by losing the camera here. Not at all. Yeah. I also share in that experience the title of my reviews that I did not miss the camera at all with these glasses.
Yeah. I will say that for an accessibility use case, the people who really lose out there are the blind and low vision community people who don't have use of their hands or have limb differences. Those people, yeah, losing the camera, this isn't a viable option for them. Totally. And that is a very big conversation, a totally different can of worms.
This is not necessarily for those people and they have other options. The other kind of feature that was introduced at MediConnect, which is also still not available just yet, is FDA cleared hearing assistance. So when you think about these in that perspective, if you're someone with mild to moderate hearing loss, you pay upfront for, I think it's an additional $150 fee. It comes to the glasses through software and then these are kind of a discrete pair of hearing assistance, hearing over the counter hearing aid type situation, which a lot of people I talk to in this industry are very aware of the stigma that comes with hearing aids and even something like a pair of air pods that have that same functionality.
A pair of glasses, if you're wearing them, it reduces the stigma quite a bit for that kind of use case. And so that's why there's a lot of interest in this type of open ear headphone solution for that particular accessibility use case. None of this solves the major problem that a lot of people have with smart glasses. I think the whole removing the camera, like walking out and about in these glasses, I was like, oh, I feel a lot more relaxed. I'm not worried.
Did you actually, I was wondering about this because I know you've struggled with how you feel testing these things out in public around other people. And if you feel like you're obligated to tell everyone everything you have that's recording every time you sit down at a table, like, did you notice the difference having these glasses versus the other ones? Yeah, because like there's no, it's a little hard to accidentally start recording with the camera glasses, but I've done it. It can be done. It happens sometimes.
And you don't always know that's happening. I've had it happen. I've been in conversation with other people who've had that happen and watch it and then you'd be like, oh, are you recording me right now? This is an awkward conversation. You know, there's no worrying on my part about having to disclose that because I actually disabled the wake word.
So if I say the wake word for these, it's not going to do anything. There's an action button here. So one, I hate saying the wake word out in public. I feel very lame doing that. So actually just programming this action button to summon the AI for me.
There's no ambient listening going on until I trigger it. And then it's either going to be the AI only listening to me for my query or if I'm activating some sort of translation feature, the way that this translation feature works now, I would have to basically inform the person hello, these are translating for me. You're disclosing that it's not necessarily one of those always listening. I'm recording every conversation you have type of feature, although understandably, I think a lot of people in the public would still view this as a sort of surveillance tech because they think, oh, it's always ambient listening. You can disable that.
I disable that. Other people wouldn't know per se, but I know. I know. I feel better about that. And my hair kind of covers the temples.
I know I'm not being a creep. And so my worry about getting punched goes infinitely down. It is kind of weird because I go out now and I'm like, I'm not going to be a jerk. I don't record people out in public. And if I do, I disclose it.
But I feel like a paranoid person because I'll go out testing these glasses and I'll think to myself, OK, well, when I'm in public, what I'm going to do in a testing scenario is I'm going to take the toggle that's inside and turn it off. And if someone asks me that these are this, I will take it off and I'll show it to them and then I'll ask them their feelings about that. And I don't use that for my future reporting and it's going to be OK, which is a psychological burden to have when you have this type of device. Yeah, I don't know that with these. I feel great.
Like I don't feel like in the comments section, some of our readers were just like, you're still a pervert. You're still creep wearing these. And I would gently say no, I'm not because again, I am disabled the wake word. It's not ambiently listening to anybody. And I can't record any footage of you.
There's no transcripts being generated. I feel great. I can just listen to my podcasts and my music when I'm out on my daily walks. And that's generally the basic function of this because the AI model that is on here and you spark in a little dumb. Yeah.
It's less dumb than before, but still kind of dumb. It is very funny to me that we're going to back our way into what I think was a good idea the first time. Like this idea of audio glasses, which let you take calls and listen to music on your glasses is not new and it's not an AI idea, but it didn't work before and it didn't really get any kind of marketing muscle or excitement behind it. But like the Bose frames, it was a long time ago now that those were out and it's like seven years. Yeah.
And it's very funny that we're going to sort of overshoot with what these glasses could be and then the whole industry is going to sort of slowly back its way up back to that seven year old idea, which I think was a good idea the whole time. It's going to be really interesting to see all of that. It's like hybrid cars, right? Like everybody we way overshot and then everybody's going to come back and be like, oh, actually the middle ground here is kind of nice. Let's linger there for a little while.
Yeah. No, that's like a really good analogy because I love the Bose frames when they first came out. I think it's Moto at the time, but my headline there was like, I was so ready to dunk on these, but actually I kind of love them. And it was surprising how much I love them because I'm someone who goes out and I walk a lot. And if you are someone who walks a lot, you want like I use this example every single time I come on here, North Jersey drivers, maniacs, maniacs, all of them.
And I really need that situational awareness while I'm out and about. I wouldn't say these are great if you're just like in the office listening to your tunes, the sound leakage is real. If you're on the subway, sorry, you still need your AirPods. It's not going to work on a subway. But if you're just out and about walking, trying to get your steps in like many of us are, and you just kind of want to listen to stuff while you're on the go, but still engage with your surroundings.
If you're at home, I love being at home and using these while I'm listening to an audio book or a podcast because I can still hear my spouse when they want my attention. Because my cat is like yelling at the moon because he's hungry, all know, and he won't like knock shit over from the table. It's great. It is like it. I have this problem at home where my spouse and I are always listening to stuff.
So we have our AirPods in and then we'll be screaming for each other because we're on a very vertical house and we're like, Hey, can you hear me? Can you hear me? And we'll be running up and down floors. I don't have that problem if they want my attention and I have this on. It's actually quite great.
Support for the show comes from I Dira by Palo Alto Networks. Every new cloud workload or AI agent your team sends out is another identity that gets permanent access to your systems. And in 2026, those non-human identities with access out number actual human identities, 109 to one, you need a tool built to manage them all human, machine and AI. That's exactly what I Dira by Palo Alto Networks was designed to do. It's one identity platform for all and it outshines legacy tools that were only built to manage human employees.
How does it work? Well, I Dira replaces permanent permissions with dynamic access so you can lock down every identity without slowing down your own business. With I Dira, you get unified control by replacing siloed IAM or identity and access management, IAM, modern privilege access management and governance tools, all with a single control plane. It does that across human, machine and AI identities, secure every identity at your organization with I Dira by Palo Alto Networks. Learn more at Palo Alto Networks dot com slash I D I R A. Again, that's Palo Alto Networks dot
com slash I D I R A. Support for the show comes from granola. Most meetings end with a bunch of action items floating around, but they're not documented anywhere concrete. Someone thinks they're handling something, but it's not actually written down. A week later, nothing has happened and nobody knows who owns the task.
That's the problem granola was designed to fix. Granola is an AI powered notepad that makes your meeting notes useful. It captures what happens in your meetings and turns it into clean structured notes with decisions and action items pulled out and made easy to find. And the best part, granola integrates seamlessly with how you already work. No setup, no configuration, no friction.
It transforms messy meeting calls into something you can actually reference weeks later. Your notes become searchable, organized and actionable. You get better notes in a central place, all while staying present in your meetings with no extra work. Once you try it on a first meeting, it's hard to go without. You can try it totally free.
Just head to granola dot AI slash a verge. Go to granola dot AI slash verge and try it on your next call. You've poked at the big thing I want to talk about here, but I do very briefly want to talk about one more gadget, which is something from Amazon B that is a name I never thought I would hear again. But I actually don't know what this is. So I just want you to tell me live what Amazon B AI thing is coming out because I assume it fits into this narrative a little bit too.
Yes. So Amazon just announced the Amazon B frontier, which last year B was its own company and then Amazon acquired it. And it's basically one of those always listening, always recording that you could call it a surveillance wearable. Sure. Let's go with that.
But it's sort of like plot note, all of these note taking apps and it'll give you to do summaries of your day, very similar to kind of what Apple has proposed for the Apple Watch Series 12 and ultra four with audio intelligence, a bit different because you do get these like transcripts of your day that you know, you can kind of assign speakers to you have to train it on your voice, but it can do that costs 70, 4.99. And it's sort of what I tested last year. So if you read the review that's up on the site, you get adjusted the features there are some changes like supposedly it's better at distinguishing your voice versus broadcast voice now. So hopefully less fan fiction gets written. This last year it was just like, Hey, be sure to take into account the septus strikes for your students with the news on TV, basically.
Or or severance. I was watching severance. And like my to do's were just like, make sure that you're in your out here on the same page and stuff like that. So they say that that's basically been fixed a bit, but it is a yikes. And they also have a kind of a version that doesn't look so much like a bit bit because the B frontier looks like a Fitbit.
They have something called the B Eclipse, which is a magsafe thing that you stick on the back of your phone. And you know, another thing that's everywhere all of a sudden. Yeah. The difference here is that this is going to have a desktop app and there's going to be a pro subscription, which has integrations. And what are those integrations?
Uh huh. This is why Amazon wanted to buy V because based on the conversations and the notes that it takes during the day, it'll be like, Oh, you talk to someone about toilet paper. Here's a handy dandy little Amazon thing so that you can do Amazon shopping. And now, by the way, you can buy through Amazon the toilet paper that you mentioned in a conversation. I spent so much of my time telling people that their phone isn't listening to them and you're telling me Amazon is shipping a gadget that makes your phone listen to you and tell you what it's saying.
That's on your wrist connects to your phone. Or importantly, is on somebody else's wrist. So okay, so this is this is the big thing that I want to get into here, which is basically this question of what is being recorded in the world. And should that be allowed? Who's doing it?
And look, we can talk about this forever, but I want to talk about one particular slice of it that I know you've been thinking a lot about, which is I think if you if even if you're a person who thinks it is horrible and wrong for you to be taking video of me all day, every day, I think a lot of people fall into that category. These tech companies are trying to find a middle ground, right, where they say we're going to in some other way capture lots of information or we're going to record things, but we're not going to store those things. We want to be able to give you this kind of information without this permanent record or transcript of everything that's going on. And will that make you feel less creeped out by these devices that are constantly paying attention to you? You wrote a story for the set a couple of weeks ago arguing that maybe that is not a distinction we can make whether technically or as humans in the world.
I'm curious how you're thinking about it right now, particularly in light of devices like these where meta is saying you can turn the thing off, we won't we're not going to be listening or watching, even if we are, we're not going to do anything with the video. It's just it's just for other stuff. Everybody is trying to find this middle ground. Do you think it exists? I think they're asking the wrong question to be quite frank.
Like, you know, they're kind of taking this clever route of litigating the definition of a recording. And so Apple is doing it. I asked B the B people yesterday at Amazon, like, you know, how are you handling this recording definition thing? And they're like, we don't record the audio file. You just have the transcript.
And so it's like, okay. Well, so wait, so by definition, you are recording the audio file. You're just then transcribing it and throwing it away. Like if you're not recording audio, you can't get a transcript. That's that's technology.
There and there you have it, right? Like Apple is Apple is doing the same thing. Basically, they're saying like we have this private compute, the raw audio file is recorded and then it's processed. But once it's processed, it's deleted. So therefore, there's no recording that's been stored and all you have is a transcript of dubious levels of attribution.
So Apple is taking the route of saying that nothing is attributed. And you know, that feels like an oblique nod to dual consent recording laws, various states like California, both parties have to consent to being recorded, New York, New Jersey, only one party has to consent to being recorded. And the whole thing is that can it be subpoenaed, right? So from a legal definition, can you use it in a case if it doesn't say who said what and it's just a high level summary, you know, a lot of these companies are arguing, like, no, that's not a recording. That is just a summary and a summary is not a recording.
But on the opposite side of that, you can just be like, you're trusting the AI to be super intelligent in discerning what's sensitive information and what's not sensitive information and how to attribute that or not. And I'm guessing any shrewd lawyer would still try to subpoena that anyway regardless of whether it's admissible or not. I mean, but also forget the lawyers. Like I think the, to your point about the Apple stuff, I think the response to the audio-intelligence stuff on the Apple watch was really interesting to me because Apple's deeply technical explanation about all the data, it's not storing, didn't make anybody feel any better. The idea that I can sit here and replay the last 15 seconds of our conversation freaked people out in like a really visceral way freaked people out.
Support for the show comes from USA Facts, income inequality, entitlements, housing costs. Want to really see what the government is up to? What it costs and who is benefiting? Check out a debate on the American dream between Scott Galloway and Ben Shapiro. It's not your typical soundbites from boring politicians reading talking points.
The debate is framed by an informative set of government facts from USA Facts. And then Ben and Scott get into it. There are sharp differences, some common ground and data and facts that leave you knowing more. So, we're going to be able to get a full debate now on the USA Facts YouTube channel. Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project, one after accounting another for inventory, another for sales, and somehow none of them talk to each other.
That's where Odo comes in. And all in one business management software that brings every part of your business together. From sales and accounting to inventory and marketing, all in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs and best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system.
Try for free today at o2.com.com. That's o-d-o-o.com.com. To me, the thing I keep thinking about is the difference between listening and recording. And I think people are spooked by things that are listening, irrespective of whether they're recording. Just the idea that you are listening to me is a problem, right?
And forget video recording. That's a whole other can of worms that I think my running theory is that eventually in some meaningful way the market is just going to reject the camera for stuff. I don't think we're coming back from perfect classes. And I just don't think the industry has realized it yet. But the audio stuff, everybody wants there to be a way through this that threads the needle that kind of works.
And I just think we're still at a point now where people cannot get past, well, what do you mean it's listening all the time? And I get the output of that listening, the existence of that listening freaks people out. Yeah, it gets to this whole actually kind of severance, like a thing where it's like, yes, your phone can record externally. But everything on your phone and how you use it, like I hold up my phone and you immediately know what I'm doing, put it in a wearable form factor. It not only does it become more discreet, you just don't necessarily know what I'm doing.
That's not reached peak consciousness in the public yet. Yes, in our little space of the nerd universe, we kind of know what we're talking about. But you talk to someone's grandpa, they have no idea what or like generally the grandpa doesn't have any idea that the glasses can do these things. And that's why I think the watch was such an interesting one. The watch is a totally mainstream device.
And everybody has it. And it's like, you're telling me that by default, it's now going to be listening to me. It's not by default. It's actually something you have to opt into. But not each time.
Like this is, it's not a thing you have to sit down and be like, I am now doing it. Welcome to our meeting. Not for a Siri recap, but the live rewind it will pop up a chime and there'll be like a little mic that's when you do it. But it's not uniform, right? It's not uniform.
There's a problem of educating the mass public about what, how these works, which I've struggled with because like, I have to sit there and I have to learn all the nitty-gritty ins and outs. But like regardless of that, the thing that it really boils down to me is that all of these devices used to just be about you and your data. You can do whatever you want with your data. And I think as a society, we know that we should be a little more circumspect and a little more cautious about what we do with our data. But there is this idea that it's my data.
I can do whatever I want with it. What this new class of devices asking is for you to be a steward of not only your data, but everyone else's data. So suddenly I'm not putting only my data at risk. I am putting your data at risk. I am basically an unintentional spy out in the world.
And nobody necessarily knows. And we don't have this cultural language to basically convey that I am not a creep. Like because the creep is out there and the metaphor that I use a lot is, and I'm feeling it from a different conversation, but like let's say you have a bowl of M&Ms and 10% of those M&Ms are poison and they're mixed in with the M&Ms that are not poison. You have people wearing glasses and let's say every single one of them can record in some capacity either audio or camera. 10% of the people are going to be creeps about it.
You don't know just by looking at someone walking down the street, which one are creeps and which ones are not. And this is a problem that the accessibility community is dealing with right now. Because if you look at someone and they are visibly blind or they are visibly handicapped in some way, you are probably going to go all day of a camera and their glasses. They're probably not a creep. They are probably using them for accessibility reasons.
However, accessibility is a spectrum. And not everyone. There is such a thing as invisible disabilities. You know, unfortunately there are cases where people are like, hey, you don't look like you need accessibility features. So you must be a pervert.
And this is why I, you know, online I'm just like, please don't punch people who are wearing these glasses. I know why everyone is saying that I know we're trying to express our discomfort with this new type of wearable surveillance, but please don't punch people because you just don't know why they have them. And the vast majority of people are not the creeps out there. They are using it primarily for their own private use. But because 10% of the M&Ms are poisoned in this scenario, you just don't know.
And I'm very empathetic to that. And I think these are super valid concerns. But you know, to get back to the original point, I don't think the tech companies are asking the right question here, which is they're going like, we've made it through some technical thing to be private. We've made it private for the owner. You haven't addressed at all the societal concerns.
You haven't addressed at all like what the etiquette should be because if you think about these always listening AI note takers, they make a lot of sense in a business in a business perspective. I think as journalists, we already disclose stuff that's recording on the record off the record, we tell our sources all of these things. For us to have these tools in those scenarios, I think the vast majority of journalists would find that extremely useful. And I think that would apply to students and classes, lecturers, business meetings, all of those scenarios, you can talk about Zoom recordings and Gemini recordings for Google Meats. A lot of us have basically gone, yeah, that's super convenient.
It makes sense to have a transcript because in that societal instance, we all understand that the recording is for this purpose and it's going to be used for notes and it's not going to be distributed and used in a nefarious way. But they're doing it 24% in. So but are we do you feel like we're just barreling towards a world where you have to assume that's happening, whether either your own devices are recording you or someone else is, right? Like 10% is a good example, right? If you're in a restaurant, should you assume that one in 10 people has one of these life logging devices and thus is capturing you in some way?
Like I had a moment the other day where I was walking my kids up the sidewalk to take care and somebody comes running out of his house and he's like, hey, I have a question for you. And it turns out he had a video of me on his ring doorbell from three days earlier right before his car got hit. And so he was like, is this you? And he showed me a video of myself from three days earlier walking my kids to day care. And this was such an innocuous thing, perfectly nice guy just asking if I saw what happened to his car.
I have not been able to stop thinking about it because I was like, oh, this person is recording me. And so when I take my kids to day care, this person is recording me. And it's just, it is the sort of thing that when that veil gets lifted, even in some small way, it gets very hard to stop noticing. And I do wonder if we are just running towards that with these life logging wearables in the same way. We are.
I actually just the other day had the same experience that you did kind of like where I was just walking through my neighborhood and I took a different route and a house said, you are now being recorded from a bring camera just announced it. And I was like, oh, I hate that because I was. At least it announces it. That's something. Not every house does, but like that particular house, I was like, is it a good thing that it announced it and maybe aware because it changed my behavior.
That's what all of these things are going to do. And that's what I think people are really kind of rebelling against. It just changes your behavior, your guard goes up. You don't feel like you can just be yourself and like just relax. So I think that is what people are viscerally reacting to.
And it's something that the tech companies are like, oh, huh, but why is that a problem? And it's like, you guys need to talk to the average person a bit more to find out why that's a problem. But it's, it's, it's one of those things where let's peel back the layers a little bit. And what do they want? I think that's the thing that's happening in the data because the data makes the AI more useful for your AI assistant to be the best possible, personal assistant ever.
It has to know everything about you, but not only everything about you, everything about the people in your lives that you interact with regularly. So that's the thing that we're grappling with. And I think that's something that society needs to weigh in on because otherwise the tech companies will make the decision for us. And I don't think that they should have unilateral ability to make that decision alone. That is something that the average person has to, has to weigh in on.
And we have to collectively have this discussion publicly and talk about how we want to use this tech because I'm just sitting here screaming internally every single day now going like, I started this job tracking steps. And now I'm in an inadvertent private spy just walking about not wanting to. Did I consent to this kind of not really at the same time? I have existential crises every day. All I will say is you should have all of these existential crises out loud so that B can hear you and maybe you can just slowly start to infect the system that way.
They're sending me one. So we'll see. I'm curious to see how it's changed from last year because last year it was very much like this thing has written fan fiction about my life. And the ways that it was actually truthful was kind of uncomfortable for me personally. We'll see.
Yeah. Love that. It'll just be like, Oh, V talked about nail glue. Here's Amazon pop up for nail glue. Yeah, you'll have to report back.
I'm very curious on the weird stuff that tries to sell you. But so keep me posted. Sure. Signing off from the wearable surveillance state. Yeah, go put on some more gadgets.
It's gonna be great. We'll see you later. Thanks, man. All right. That's it for the show.
Thank you again to V for being here and thank you as always for listening. This is a category. As you just heard, I want to hear lots of opinions about it. I think this is a kind of device that all of these companies want to put on our faces and on our wrists and all over our bodies for a variety of reasons. And there are real honest to God, good use cases for them, but they all come with this big, messy set of trade offs.
And I really want to know how all of you feel about it. So send us an email at virgincastathbirds.com, call the hotline, 866-1-1-1, weigh in on all of this and everything else. And like we said, please don't punch each other in the face. And as always, the best thing you can do to support all of what we're up to here at the Verge is to subscribe to the Verge. The Verge.com slash subscribe.
It gets you all of our podcasts ad free, including this one. It gets you all of our exclusive newsletters. It gets you all of our coverage of everything, all of the time, the Verge.com slash subscribe. Thank you, advance. The Vergecast is a Verge production and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.
This episode is produced by Josh Cauhas, career Chopra, Eric Gomez, Brandon Keever, Travis Lurchock. See you tomorrow. Rock and roll.