Executive Powers, Immunity, and other Implications from this SCOTUS Session - Prof Walker

from SLU LAW Summations Hosted by Saint Louis University School of Law

In a watershed ruling regarding executive powers, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Trump v United States that presidents should be immune from prosecution for official actions they took while in office. While historically presidents have enjoyed some level of immunity, this ruling expands that greatly. To discuss this monumental ruling and the implications for the future of the presidency, we are joined by Professor Anders Walker. Professor Walker is an expert in constitutional law and American legal history.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Executive Powers, Immunity, and other Implications from this SCOTUS Session - Prof Walker

0:00 15:30

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Share this episode

Similar podcasts

Lex Rex: Where the Law is King Colson Duggins Attorney Colson Duggins provides through and incisive legal commentary on current events. If you've ever watched the news or heard about a new law or political action and thought, "Is that really how the law works?" then this podcast is for you.Colson does a deep dive into hot button cultural and political topics from a legal perspective, teaching the audience general principles of law that will assist them in understanding the legal system at large, especially as it relates to political and cultural matters.New episodes posted weekly on Tuesday morning!

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of SLU LAW Summations?

This episode is 15 minutes long.

When was this SLU LAW Summations episode published?

This episode was published on July 5, 2024.

Can I download this SLU LAW Summations episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.