EPISODE · Nov 13, 2025 · 3 MIN
Exodus 5: A Three Day Tour
from YINR 929: Tanach Yomi · host Josh Blechner
God pressed Moshe to go to Egypt to demand that Pharaoh release the Israelites. Yet, instead of asking for complete freedom immediately, God instructed Moshe to begin with a modest request—a three-day journey into the wilderness to worship:“They will listen to you; then you and the elders of Israel shall go to the king of Egypt and say to him, ‘The Lord, the God of the Hebrews, has manifested Himself to us. Therefore, let us go a distance of three days into the wilderness to sacrifice to the Lord our God.’” (Exodus 3:18)Hebrew: וְשָׁמְעוּ לְקֹלֶךָ וּבָאתָ אַתָּה וְזִקְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶל־מֶלֶךְ מִצְרַיִם וַאֲמַרְתֶּם אֵלָיו ה׳ אֱלֹהֵי הָעִבְרִים נִקְרָה עָלֵינוּ וְעַתָּה נֵלְכָה נָא דֶּרֶךְ שְׁלֹשֶׁת יָמִים בַּמִּדְבָּר וְנִזְבְּחָה לַה׳ אֱלֹהֵינוּWhen Moshe and Aharon first approach Pharaoh in chapter 5, they make an even vaguer request—permission to go celebrate God in the wilderness without specifying a timeframe. Pharaoh scoffs and questions, “Who is the Lord that I should heed Him?” In response, Moshe and Aharon clarify their request, adding urgency:“Lest [God] strike us with pestilence or sword.” (Exodus 5:3)Hebrew: פֶּן־יִפְגָּעֵנוּ בַּדֶּבֶר אוֹ בֶחָרֶבPharaoh not only refuses but retaliates by increasing the Israelites’ workload, deepening their suffering and alienating them from Moshe.Why did God instruct Moshe to ask for only three days? Malbim explains that this was a strategic move: by proposing the smallest, most reasonable request, God would expose Pharaoh’s obstinacy. If Pharaoh would not grant even a short religious leave, it would demonstrate his absolute refusal to compromise. Later, this “three-day journey” becomes a recurring point in negotiations, with Pharaoh offering partial concessions—such as allowing only men to go—while Moshe insists that everyone must participate.But why does Moshe initially omit the three-day detail, then later specify it, and even add a warning of divine punishment? One possibility is that “three days” in biblical language often signifies a period of separation or transition rather than a literal 72 hours. For example, Lavan placed a three-day distance between himself and Yaacov when dividing the flocks (Genesis 30:36), and Yosef interpreted the dreams of Pharaoh’s servants by saying their outcomes would occur “in three days” (Genesis 40:12–13). In both cases, “three days” marks a turning point.Thus, Moshe and Aharon may have begun with a general request to avoid alarming Pharaoh. When Pharaoh resists, they clarify that they seek only the minimum—a symbolic period of separation. Then they add the phrase: “lest God strike us with pestilence or sword” (פֶּן־יִפְגָּעֵנוּ בַּדֶּבֶר אוֹ בֶחָרֶב).On a simple level, this appeals to Pharaoh’s religious sensibilities: ancient rulers feared angering the gods. Yet this argument seems weak—Pharaoh considered himself divine, and in the ancient worldview, a conquered people’s god was powerless. So why mention it?Another interpretation is that this is a veiled threat. Moshe and Aharon avoid saying “God will strike you,” instead using “us,” but the implication is clear: if Pharaoh refuses, divine punishment will come—not only upon Israel but upon Egypt and its king. This subtle phrasing allows Moshe to warn Pharaoh without direct confrontation, setting the stage for the escalating plagues that follow.
Embed this episode
Ready to play
Exodus 5: A Three Day Tour
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.