Explainer 19 – The Burden of Proof in Competition Law episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 2, 2020 · 16 MIN

Explainer 19 – The Burden of Proof in Competition Law

from RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast · host The Federalist Society

The House Committee on the Judiciary recently released a report on the state of competition in the digital marketplace. The report, which was the result of a 16-month-long investigation, describes itself as "an attack on how America has approached antitrust for the past 40 years."One of the recommendations in the report involves shifting the evidentiary burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant, particularly in civil mergers challenges, which would entail a significant change to antitrust law.In this episode, Ashley Baker lays out the current burden of proof framework used in U.S. courts in competition law cases, the role of presumptions in antitrust litigation, and the potential implications of the burden shift proposed in the report.Featuring:- Ashley Baker, Director of Public Policy, Committee for JusticeVisit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 2, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Explainer 19 – The Burden of Proof in Competition Law

0:00 16:33

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast?

This episode is 16 minutes long.

When was this RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on December 2, 2020.

Can I download this RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!