FAQ: What Does Clinically Inadvisable Mean in Upadacitinib’s Expanded UC and CD Indications? episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 3, 2026 · 3 MIN

FAQ: What Does Clinically Inadvisable Mean in Upadacitinib’s Expanded UC and CD Indications?

from GHAPPcast

Thank you to AbbVie for their support on this FAQ Video Module.In this FAQ video module, Jamie Brogan, APRN from the IBD Center at Northwestern Medicine, breaks down the October 2025 FDA label expansion for upadacitinib in adult patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The discussion focuses on the updated indication for patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to TNF inhibitors—and importantly, the newly emphasized language around when TNF therapy may be considered “clinically inadvisable.” Jamie explores what this term means in real-world clinical practice, including patient-specific factors such as contraindications to TNF agents, need for rapid onset of action, prior treatment exposure, comorbidities, and access or adherence challenges. She shares practical insights on how this label expansion has impacted IBD management, increased treatment access, and supported individualized, risk-benefit decision-making between providers and patients.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 3, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

FAQ: What Does Clinically Inadvisable Mean in Upadacitinib’s Expanded UC and CD Indications?

0:00 3:33

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of GHAPPcast?

This episode is 3 minutes long.

When was this GHAPPcast episode published?

This episode was published on February 3, 2026.

Can I download this GHAPPcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!