FAQ: What Is the ORAL Surveillance Study and How Can It Be Applied to Clinical Practice? episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 11, 2024 · 2 MIN

FAQ: What Is the ORAL Surveillance Study and How Can It Be Applied to Clinical Practice?

from RhAPPcast

Join Heather Mambretti, PA-C, a rheumatology specialist in Houston, Texas, as she breaks down the key findings of the Oral Surveillance Study and discusses what they mean for clinical practice. This critical safety trial compared JAK inhibitors to TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with cardiovascular risk factors, leading to significant regulatory changes by the FDA.The Oral Surveillance Study was a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority post-authorization safety trial evaluating the safety of JAK inhibitors compared to TNF inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor.Patients were randomized to receive tofacitinib (5 mg or 10 mg twice daily) or a TNF inhibitor, with the primary endpoints being major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) over a median follow-up of four years.The study found that patients receiving tofacitinib had a higher incidence of MACE (3.4%) compared to TNF inhibitors (2.5%), with a hazard ratio of 1.33. Similarly, cancer incidence was higher (4.2%) in the tofacitinib group compared to 2.9% in the TNF inhibitor group. These findings did not meet non-inferiority criteria, raising significant safety concerns regarding JAK inhibitors.As a result, the FDA extended these findings to all JAK inhibitors and restricted their use in RA patients only after failure of a TNF inhibitor. However, some clinicians question the external validity of the study, as it only assessed one JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib). Given differences in JAK receptor selectivity, certain JAK1-selective agents, like upadacitinib, may offer a different safety profile, but further comparative studies are needed.Until head-to-head studies are conducted, clinicians should follow FDA guidelines, weighing the risks and benefits of JAK inhibitors carefully, particularly in older patients and those with cardiovascular risk factors.For more expert insights and the latest advancements in rheumatology, download the RhAPP ACE App for valuable resources and clinical updates.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 11, 2024

Embed this episode

In this RhAPP FAQ video module, Heather Mambretti, PA-C, discusses the ORAL Surveillance Study in detail, focusing on its findings and implications for clinical practice. This post-authorization safety endpoint trial compared the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cancers between patients receiving tofacitinib and those receiving TNF inhibitors. The study found higher incidences of MACE and cancers in patients treated with tofacitinib, leading to the FDA's decision to res...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

FAQ: What Is the ORAL Surveillance Study and How Can It Be Applied to Clinical Practice?

0:00 2:42

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of RhAPPcast?

This episode is 2 minutes long.

When was this RhAPPcast episode published?

This episode was published on October 11, 2024.

Can I download this RhAPPcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!