Federal Reserve Employees Flood Cash to One Liberal Side plus Treasury Targets Iran’s Global Money Dark Web

1. Political Bias in the Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve employees heavily favor Democrats politically, citing a statistic that over 90% of donations went to Democrats in 2024. This is evidence that the Fed is no longer neutral and has become partisan and ideologically left-leaning. This bias could influence economic policy in ways hostile to free markets. 2. Examples Used to Support the Bias Claim Several individual Fed employees are named and described as donating to: Progressive or socialist candidates (e.g., Bernie Sanders, AOC). Candidates with positions critical of capitalism or U.S. allies. These cases are presented to reinforce the idea of a systemic ideological trend inside the Fed. 3. Criticism of Federal Reserve Leadership and Performance The Fed is held to account: Handling of inflation (described as the worst in decades). Ethical issues (resignations of officials). Banking failures (several large collapses). Also mentions controversy over expensive renovations to Fed facilities. 4. U.S. Policy on Iran Increased enforcement of sanctions. Efforts to target money laundering networks tied to Iran. U.S. banks are being pushed to: Monitor suspicious transactions. Identify shell companies and disguised oil trade activity. Prior administrations were: Failing to enforce sanctions effectively. Allowing Iran to continue economic activity tied to terrorism. The narrative presents current policy as more aggressive and corrective. 5. Global Financial System’s Role Banks worldwide are portrayed as: Sometimes ignoring illicit funding sources for profit. Potentially enabling terrorist financing and sanctions evasion. New U.S. measures effectively pressure global banks to cooperate. 6. Iran’s Internal Power Structure (Major Analytical Section) Historically: Iran was controlled by a single supreme leader (Ayatollah). Current situation (according to the speaker): Leadership is now unclear and fragmented after conflict and leadership changes. Power may be shifting toward the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The IRGC is: A military, political, and economic force. Potentially the real governing authority in Iran. It controls: Military operations, intelligence, and proxy groups. Iran may now operate under: A “committee-style” leadership instead of a single authority. This creates risks: Slower decision-making. Confusion and miscommunication. Increased chance of miscalculation in conflicts. 7. Increased Risk of Conflict The lack of clear leadership could lead to: More aggressive or unpredictable actions. Escalation in: Nuclear negotiations Regional conflicts (especially involving Israel and the U.S.) Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.