Forensic Science in the Criminal Justice System: What is Admissible? episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 26, 2015 · 29 MIN

Forensic Science in the Criminal Justice System: What is Admissible?

from Digital Detectives · host Legal Talk Network

In this episode of Digital Detectives, Sharon Nelson and John Simek interview Judge David Waxse about the 2009 report by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the relationship between bad science and wrongful convictions, and how to improve the use of forensic science in the criminal justice system. The NAS report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, found that with the exception of DNA, no forms of forensic science comply with scientific methodology. Waxse discusses the jury’s confidence in unproven science experts and witness testimony and the resulting wrongful convictions. He explains why people are just now becoming concerned with the 2009 report and discusses why The Willingham Case is relevant. Waxse plans to hold a symposium in April 2015 at Northwestern Law School in Chicago to consider with experts how to educate judges and lawyers in the criminal justice system about this issue. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 26, 2015

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Forensic Science in the Criminal Justice System: What is Admissible?

0:00 29:28

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Digital Detectives?

This episode is 29 minutes long.

When was this Digital Detectives episode published?

This episode was published on February 26, 2015.

Can I download this Digital Detectives episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!