FTC Labels ABA a Monopoly (Ep. 537)
from Thinking LSAT Hosted by Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
The FTC submitted a letter to the Texas Supreme Court supporting its decision to drop the ABA as the state’s official accreditor. Ben and Nathan agree that the ABA has been slow to modernize and often lags behind student needs, but they don’t fully align with the FTC’s reasoning. Also in this episode: - A listener asks whether to choose a part-time or full-time law program. - Whether to cancel an official score that comes in lower than a prior LSAT. - A personal statement with an unusually bold opening. Links Mentioned: FTC Letter to Texas Supreme Court Study with our Free Plan Download our iOS app Watch Episode 537 on YouTube Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments Get caught up with our Word of the Week library Questions? [email protected] 0:00 When to Take Practice Tests 6:11 FTC Claims the ABA is a Monopoly 21:43 Full-Time vs. Part-Time Law Programs 29:47 Tips from Departing Demons 35:02 Performing Worse on the First Section 43:19 Cancelling a Lower Score 46:45 Personal Statement Gong Show
Embed this episode
No transcript yet.