Future of Voting Rights in the Balance at Supreme Court episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 5, 2021 · 24 MIN

Future of Voting Rights in the Balance at Supreme Court

from Cases and Controversies · host Bloomberg Law

With more proposals at statehouses to restrict voting following the 2020 election, the Supreme Court is considering a case that could make it harder to challenge such laws in federal court. In a just-argued case challenging out-of-precinct voting and ballot harvesting prohibitions in Arizona, the justices will decide how to measure whether voting restrictions unconstitutionally discriminate against minorities or are simply the "ordinary burdens" of voting. University of Iowa law professor Derek Muller joins Cases and Controversies to discusses the importance of the case beyond the battleground Grand Canyon State.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 5, 2021

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Future of Voting Rights in the Balance at Supreme Court

0:00 24:13

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Cases and Controversies?

This episode is 24 minutes long.

When was this Cases and Controversies episode published?

This episode was published on March 5, 2021.

Can I download this Cases and Controversies episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!