EPISODE · May 27, 2022 · 1H 19M
Gerard Hodgkinson: Emotions in Strategic Decisions, Critical Realism - 4Sight Chats SE2 Ep. 4
from 4Sight Chats · host Alex Fergnani
Gerard is Vice Dean for Research of the Faculty of Humanities and Professor of Strategic Management and Behavioural Science at Alliance Manchester Business School. Alex is PhD Candidate at NUS Business School, Singapore. Available in video format: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqvNxpeG90k Chat outline: -The role of emotions in foresight and strategic decision making -How to take emotions into account as foresight practitioners (both in others and ourselves) -Risks as feelings -The science-practice divide -Critical realism as a philosophical framework to study futures and foresight MENTIONED REFERENCES: Hodgkinson and Wright (2002). Confronting Strategic Inertia in a Top Management Team: Learning from Failure: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840602236014 David Teece’s dynamic capabilities framework: https://www.davidjteece.com/dynamic-capabilities Kahneman (2013). Thinking, Fast and Slow: https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman/dp/0374533555 Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, and Welch (2001). Risks as feelings: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11316014/ Evans (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning judgment, and social cognition: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18154502/ Evans and Stanovich (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691612460685 Anderson, Herriot and Hodgkinson (2001). The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here?: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-10499-002 Fergnani and Chermack (2021). The resistance to scientific theory in futures and foresight and what to do about it: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.61 Hodgkinson (2021). Why appealing to the virtues of scientific theory (and method) is necessary but insufficient for effecting systemic change: A commentary on Fergnani & Chermack 2021: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.79 Hodgkinson and Healey (2008). Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840607088022 To know more about Gerard, see: https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/gerard.hodgkinson.html Support Alex's videos: https://www.patreon.com/alexfergnani Audio by Bensound
What this episode covers
Gerard is Vice Dean for Research of the Faculty of Humanities and Professor of Strategic Management and Behavioural Science at Alliance Manchester Business School. Alex is PhD Candidate at NUS Business School, Singapore. Available in video format: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqvNxpeG90k Chat outline: -The role of emotions in foresight and strategic decision making -How to take emotions into account as foresight practitioners (both in others and ourselves) -Risks as feelings -The science-practice divide -Critical realism as a philosophical framework to study futures and foresight MENTIONED REFERENCES: Hodgkinson and Wright (2002). Confronting Strategic Inertia in a Top Management Team: Learning from Failure: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840602236014 David Teece’s dynamic capabilities framework: https://www.davidjteece.com/dynamic-capabilities Kahneman (2013). Thinking, Fast and Slow: https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman/dp/0374533555 Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, and Welch (2001). Risks as feelings: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11316014/ Evans (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning judgment, and social cognition: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18154502/ Evans and Stanovich (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691612460685 Anderson, Herriot and Hodgkinson (2001). The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here?: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-10499-002 Fergnani and Chermack (2021). The resistance to scientific theory in futures and foresight and what to do about it: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.61 Hodgkinson (2021). Why appealing to the virtues of scientific theory (and method) is necessary but insufficient for effecting systemic change: A commentary on Fergnani & Chermack 2021: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.79 Hodgkinson and Healey (2008). Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840607088022 To know more about Gerard, see: https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/gerard.hodgkinson.html Support Alex's videos: https://www.patreon.com/alexfergnani Audio by Bensound
NOW PLAYING
Gerard Hodgkinson: Emotions in Strategic Decisions, Critical Realism - 4Sight Chats SE2 Ep. 4
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
May 11, 2026 ·41m
Apr 27, 2026 ·38m
Mar 31, 2026 ·42m
Mar 16, 2026 ·40m
Mar 2, 2026 ·32m