Glossip v. Oklahoma episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 10, 2025 · 1H 34M

Glossip v. Oklahoma

from Supreme Court Opinions · host SCOTUS Opinions

In this case, the court considered this issue: May Oklahoma carry out the execution of Richard Glossip in light of the prosecutorial misconduct and other errors that affected his conviction and sentencing?The case was decided on February 25, 2025.The Supreme Court held that the prosecution’s failure to correct false testimony violated the Due Process Clause under Napue v Illinois. A conviction that relies on false evidence, knowingly allowed by the prosecution, requires reversal if there is a reasonable likelihood the falsehood affected the jury’s judgment. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the 6-2 majority opinion of the Court.The prosecution allowed its key witness, Justin Sneed, to provide false testimony about his mental health and medical treatment. The new evidence showed that Sneed was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and prescribed lithium, facts that were withheld from the defense. At trial, Sneed falsely claimed he was never treated by a psychiatrist and received lithium mistakenly. This falsehood was material because Sneed’s testimony was the only direct evidence implicating Glossip, and impeachment of his credibility could have influenced the jury’s decision. The prosecution had prior knowledge of Sneed’s mental health treatment and still failed to correct the misstatement when it was made to the jury.Correcting this false testimony would likely have changed the jury’s assessment of Sneed’s reliability. Additionally, the prosecution’s violations extended beyond Napue: it suppressed exculpatory evidence, interfered with witness testimony, and allowed destruction of key physical evidence. Given these cumulative errors and their impact on the fairness of the trial, Glossip is entitled to a new trial. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ rejection of the attorney general’s confession of error was based on a misapplication of federal law.Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you. 

In this case, the court considered this issue: May Oklahoma carry out the execution of Richard Glossip in light of the prosecutorial misconduct and other errors that affected his conviction and sentencing?The case was decided on February 25, 2025.The Supreme Court held that the prosecution’s failure to correct false testimony violated the Due Process Clause under Napue v Illinois. A conviction that relies on false evidence, knowingly allowed by the prosecution, requires reversal if there is a reasonable likelihood the falsehood affected the jury’s judgment. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the 6-2 majority opinion of the Court.The prosecution allowed its key witness, Justin Sneed, to provide false testimony about his mental health and medical treatment. The new evidence showed that Sneed was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and prescribed lithium, facts that were withheld from the defense. At trial, Sneed falsely claimed he was never treated by a psychiatrist and received lithium mistakenly. This falsehood was material because Sneed’s testimony was the only direct evidence implicating Glossip, and impeachment of his credibility could have influenced the jury’s decision. The prosecution had prior knowledge of Sneed’s mental health treatment and still failed to correct the misstatement when it was made to the jury.Correcting this false testimony would likely have changed the jury’s assessment of Sneed’s reliability. Additionally, the prosecution’s violations extended beyond Napue: it suppressed exculpatory evidence, interfered with witness testimony, and allowed destruction of key physical evidence. Given these cumulative errors and their impact on the fairness of the trial, Glossip is entitled to a new trial. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ rejection of the attorney general’s confession of error was based on a misapplication of federal law.Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

NOW PLAYING

Glossip v. Oklahoma

0:00 1:34:32

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

The Laura Ingraham Show Laura Ingraham The most-watched woman in the history of cable news brings her no-holds-barred political and cultural commentary to podcasting with The Laura Ingraham Show. A bestselling author, breast cancer survivor, and mother of three internationally adopted children, Laura was the most listened-to woman in talk radio before launching her own podcast. A trailblazer across media platforms, she brings a unique perspective to this twice-weekly show, drawing on her experience as a white-collar criminal defense litigator and a Supreme Court law clerk.New episodes drop twice a week—delivering the clarity, courage, and common sense America needs. SGP Radio Originals SGP Radio I conduct interviews, talk about the real & fake of wrestling, giving my takes & opinions on social and current matters and there's much more in store. Follow SGP Radio to know when new content is live and on demand.SGP Radio is a nonstop 24/7 broadcast and podcast radio station by Gerald Roberts Hotline: 917-283-8956 For bookings, guest spots, interviews and all other SGP Radio inquiries contact Gerald Roberts emailing [email protected]. All content on SGP Radio ancillary and primary platforms are the original works of those associated with SGP Radio or third party content that SGP Radio has written consent to reproduce and redistribute. Recommendation: Must Be 18 years or olderAdvertising Disclaimer: Ads on our platforms don't inherently reflect the views of our company, affiliates or those associated with us.SGP Radio Hotline: 718-952-8034 or 917-283-8956 on WhatsApp<a href="https://www.sgpradio.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopene Two Flawed Broads Two Flawed Broads Two Flawed Broads is a podcast hosted by two women who are unapologetically themselves. With humor and wit, they discuss their journeys of self-discovery and personal growth. The hosts, Alexys and Sherri, discuss a variety of topics, from pop culture to politics, and share their personal experiences and opinions and encourage their listeners to do the same. Join these two flawed but fabulous women as they offer a fresh perspective on the world around us. Across The Pond Liberty Stacia Whittecar and Kirstin Clark Welcome to "Across the Pond Liberty," the podcast that paints the New York Liberty's journey in vibrant colours, uniting fans from both sides of the Atlantic. Join hosts Stacia from Kansas and Kirstin from Scotland, as they embark on an exhilarating season-long journey with the Liberty, delivering the latest news, updates, and a shared passion for the team. Meet Your Hosts: 🏀 Stacia: Hailing from Kansas, Stacia's love for the New York Liberty transcends geographical boundaries. With her deep understanding of the game and unwavering support for the team, Stacia is your guide to all things Liberty, both on and off the court. 🏀 Kirstin: Crossing the ocean from Scotland, Kirstin adds an international touch to the podcast. Her genuine passion for the Liberty and her unique perspective from across the pond contribute a fresh outlook that connects fans worldwide. Diving into the Liberty's World: "Across the Pond Liberty" is you

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 34 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on March 10, 2025.

What is this episode about?

In this case, the court considered this issue: May Oklahoma carry out the execution of Richard Glossip in light of the prosecutorial misconduct and other errors that affected his conviction and sentencing?The case was decided on February 25,...

Can I download this Supreme Court Opinions episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!