"Grant applications and grand narratives" by Elizabeth episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 28, 2023 · 11 MIN

"Grant applications and grand narratives" by Elizabeth

from LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

The Lightspeed application asks:  “What impact will [your project] have on the world? What is your project’s goal, how will you know if you’ve achieved it, and what is the path to impact?”LTFF uses an identical question, and SFF puts it even more strongly (“What is your organization’s plan for improving humanity’s long term prospects for survival and flourishing?”). I’ve applied to all three grants of these at various points, and I’ve never liked this question. It feels like it wants a grand narrative of an amazing, systemic project that will measurably move the needle on x-risk. But I’m typically applying for narrowly defined projects, like “Give nutrition tests to EA vegans and see if there’s a problem”. I think this was a good project. I think this project is substantially more likely to pay off than underspecified alignment strategy research, and arguably has as good a long tail.  But when I look at “What impact will [my project] have on the world?” the project feels small and sad. I feel an urge to make things up, and express far more certainty for far more impact than I  believe. Then I want to quit, because lying is bad but listing my true beliefs feels untenable.I’ve gotten better at this over time, but I know other people with similar feelings, and I suspect it’s a widespread issue (I encourage you to share your experience in the comments so we can start figuring that out).I should note that the pressure for grand narratives has good points; funders are in fact looking for VC-style megabits. I think that narrow projects are underappreciated, but for purposes of this post that’s beside the point: I think many grantmakers are undercutting their own preferred outcomes by using questions that implicitly push for a grand narrative. I think they should probably change the form, but I also think we applicants can partially solve the problem by changing how we interact with the current forms.My goal here is to outline the problem, gesture at some possible solutions, and create a space for other people to share data. I didn’t think about my solutions very long, I am undoubtedly missing a bunch and what I do have still needs workshopping, but it’s a place to start. Source:https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FNPXbwKGFvXWZxHGE/grant-applications-and-grand-narrativesNarrated for LessWrong by TYPE III AUDIO.Share feedback on this narration.[Curated Post] ✓

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 28, 2023

Embed this episode

The Lightspeed application asks: “What impact will [your project] have on the world? What is your project’s goal, how will you know if you’ve achieved it, and what is the path to impact?” LTFF uses an identical question, and SFF puts it even more strongly (“What is your organization’s plan for improving humanity’s long term prospects for survival and flourishing?”). I’ve applied to all three grants of these at various points, and I’ve never liked this question. It feels like it wa...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

"Grant applications and grand narratives" by Elizabeth

0:00 11:20

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of LessWrong (Curated & Popular)?

This episode is 11 minutes long.

When was this LessWrong (Curated & Popular) episode published?

This episode was published on July 28, 2023.

Can I download this LessWrong (Curated & Popular) episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!