EPISODE · Jan 12, 2009

Harbison v. Bell

from U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that a certificate of appealability is not required to appeal an order denying a request for federally appointed counsel; and the federally appointed counsel may represent their client in state clemency proceedings and are entitled to compensation for such representation.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 12, 2009

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Harbison v. Bell

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on January 12, 2009.

Can I download this U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!