EPISODE · Oct 15, 2008
Hedgpeth v. Pulido
from U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments
A case in which the Court held that the error of instructing a jury on multiple theories of guilt does not spoil all of the jury's findings, but rather the error should be evaluated by whether it caused a "substantial and injurious effect" on the verdict.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Hedgpeth v. Pulido
0:00
0:00
1×
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.
Frequently Asked Questions
When was this U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments episode published?
This episode was published on October 15, 2008.
Can I download this U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments episode?
Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!