Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.

from U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that the Employment Retirement Income Security Act does not mandate a statute of limitations, allowing both parties in an insurance suit to mutually agree on a timeframe in which civil suits may be brought to court.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 15, 2013

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.

0:00 0:00

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on October 15, 2013.

Can I download this U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!