Hemphill v. New York & Refreshing Recollection Fails episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 11, 2022 · 24 MIN

Hemphill v. New York & Refreshing Recollection Fails

from Litigator Libations · host Darrel-the-DCAP

Send us Fan MailIn this episode we discuss the case of Hemphill v. New York, where the Supreme Court held that an accused did not waive his right to confront an absent witness when he offered  evidence that implied the absent witness was the true perpetrator of the offense.  We then discuss how to respond when your witness refuses to remember a fact of consequence despite having their memory refreshed.

Send us Fan Mail In this episode we discuss the case of Hemphill v. New York, where the Supreme Court held that an accused did not waive his right to confront an absent witness when he offered evidence that implied the absent witness was the true perpetrator of the offense. We then discuss how to respond when your witness refuses to remember a fact of consequence despite having their memory refreshed.

NOW PLAYING

Hemphill v. New York & Refreshing Recollection Fails

0:00 24:58

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Litigator Libations?

This episode is 24 minutes long.

When was this Litigator Libations episode published?

This episode was published on February 11, 2022.

What is this episode about?

Send us Fan MailIn this episode we discuss the case of Hemphill v. New York, where the Supreme Court held that an accused did not waive his right to confront an absent witness when he offered  evidence that implied the absent witness was the true...

Can I download this Litigator Libations episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!