Skip to content
Heuristics: Flawed shortcuts, or adaptive tools? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 26, 2026 · 15 MIN

Heuristics: Flawed shortcuts, or adaptive tools?

from Cracking the Shell on Psychological Science · host Maryland PSYCTerps

Perhaps one of the most widely studied topics in psychological science involves the study of heuristics and biases. Starting with the groundbreaking work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, the term "heuristic" became synonymous with decision making, and heuristic mechanisms such as "availability" and "representative" spread throughout psychology and even into popular science. Today, it's hard to imagine an area of cognitive science or economics that has had a greater effect on our understanding of human decision making. In this episode, Mike and Joey discuss some common decision heuristics and biases and the critiques of Tversky and Kahneman's work. Did Tversky and Kahneman have it right? Or, might it be better to recouch decision making in terms of an adaptive toolbox, as proposed by Gerd Gigerenzer?

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 26, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Heuristics: Flawed shortcuts, or adaptive tools?

0:00 15:32

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Cracking the Shell on Psychological Science?

This episode is 15 minutes long.

When was this Cracking the Shell on Psychological Science episode published?

This episode was published on January 26, 2026.

Can I download this Cracking the Shell on Psychological Science episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!