House votes to fix daylight saving time; James holds listener discussion. episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 15, 2026 · 9 MIN

House votes to fix daylight saving time; James holds listener discussion.

from The Charlie James Show Podcast

Host Charlie James discusses the U.S. House of Representatives passing the Sunshine Protection Act, a bill that would make daylight saving time permanent and eliminate the biannual clock shift. James shares his perspective as a veteran morning radio host, noting that changing clocks had minimal personal impact on his early schedule, before inviting audience members to call in with their views. A listener named Neil from Sunnyview phones in to clarify a common misconception, humorously pointing out that altering the clocks does not actually change the sun's physical movement or the total length of daylight. James then reads through an array of mixed messages from listeners debating the societal benefits of standard time versus daylight saving time for various daily and occupational routines.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 15, 2026

Embed this episode

Crowd: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. (Singing): Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain. For purple mountain majesties above the fruited plain. America, America, God shed His grace on thee, and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea. (Crowd Applause) Charlie James: America is back! And we are back. Welcome back to the program. Well, there is a lawsuit going on with Greenville County over a housing development. Let's go to the Chairman of the Greenville County Council, Benton Blount. Benton, welcome to the program. Hope you're doing well. Benton Blount: I'm doing good, Charlie. Hope you are as well. Charlie James: Yes, sir. Uh, so is this over the Owens Glen project? Benton Blount: Uh, yes, sir. This is something that uh took place. It's been long-going, started in 2024, um and just back and forth through the process up until uh a recent reconsideration and denial by the Planning Commission. And now we are dealing with some litigation currently in in the court system. Charlie James: So, just to get up to speed, this was a uh 118-acre, 300-home development. Um, it was approved by the Planning Commission, and then here recently, it got unapproved? Benton Blunt: Yes. Basically, what happened is a is a is a council member, uh Councilman Bradley, from southern part of Greenville County went out with uh a news team and uh one of the reporters measured the road in front of where the development was going to go to find out that it was going to be 15 feet wide. Is is all that it was. Um, and to match that with a thousand uh a petition with a thousand uh constituents from that area in opposition to it, uh just out of concern for safety, it was brought to council and requested that it go back to the Planning Commission. And they they reevaluated the information and felt like that it was not safe, and they chose to deny it. Charlie James: So, I mean, how wide should a road be um adjacent to a development like this? Benton Blunt: You know, it it really depends uh not just on that development, but the the surrounding area, if there's other residential areas. But, uh there's there's different metrics that they use, whether it's a state or county road. I know that 15 feet is not very wide, and to any of your listeners currently sitting in traffic, I know that that concern about traffic congestion just continues to grow. So, uh I don't know what the exact answer is on the right-of-way, but I think that 15 is definitely pretty narrow. Charlie James: So, as expected, lawyers are now involved, and I know you can't get into some of the details about this. But, a lot of people saying this is this is a case that uh Greenville County could lose. Benton Blunt: I, uh you know, like I said, I I definitely can't speak to the case itself yet until the judge gives the ruling. But, um development in in Greenville County and South Carolina in general is just a difficult process. We have a lot of state laws that kind of tie our hands to certain things, and when the public is in opposition, we obviously listen to our citizens. Uh, but that can unfortunately put us up against the the court system sometimes. But, you know, that's what we're trying to do is really balance out obviously following the law, but also listening to our citizens. Charlie James: Kind of got me that uh even Inez Fance said that the Planning Commission got this one wrong. Benton Blunt: Yeah. I mean, you know, I I think a lot of it comes back to we really have to uh bear down and follow our our state laws, or we have to lobby our legislators to change them. Uh, and and until then, we're going to find ourselves in these in these predicaments. And even have some uh people sometimes that normally wouldn't speak out in a way you think they would, like Dr. Fance, that might say something that could pr ...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

House votes to fix daylight saving time; James holds listener discussion.

0:00 9:56

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Charlie James Show Podcast?

This episode is 9 minutes long.

When was this The Charlie James Show Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on July 15, 2026.

Can I download this The Charlie James Show Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!