How A 1989 Broadcasting Law Became An Internet Speech Rule - with Steven Franks

We break down the Broadcasting Standards Authority’s claim that it can regulate online platforms under the Broadcasting Act 1989, even though Parliament never updated the law for the internet. We talk through why that change threatens open debate, why the standards are so subjective, and why we think this fight matters for free speech in New Zealand. • the BSA asserting jurisdiction over online speech via an old statute • why broadcast standards existed in a scarce spectrum era • how the internet breaks the logic of compulsory audiences and balance rules • the subjectivity of “good taste and decency” and why it becomes a power tool • Tikanga flashpoints and the idea of modern “heresy trials” • inconsistencies in targeting small outlets while excluding major platforms • the practical mess of defining audiences and applying on-demand exceptions • the chilling effect of complaints, process costs, and potential fines • political and international risks if New Zealand is seen to censor platforms • why we say we have to fight and what could come next If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and consider sharing the podcast with others. We release new episodes regularly, and subscribing is the easiest way to stay up to date. If you have any questions, feedback or suggestions, you can contact us at podcast at fsu.nz. If you want to find out more about the New Zealand Free Speech Union, visit fsu.nz. Support the showhttps://www.fsu.nz/https://x.com/NZFreeSpeechhttps://www.instagram.com/freespeechnz/https://www.tiktok.com/@freespeechunionnz