How Court Nominations Polarize Interest Groups and Voters episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 21, 2020 · 43 MIN

How Court Nominations Polarize Interest Groups and Voters

from The Science of Politics · host Niskanen Center

Interest groups on both sides were ready for battle when President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barret to the Supreme Court. As Republicans vote to confirm her, how will voters respond? Jonathan Kastellec finds that interest groups have polarized the debate: starting earlier in nomination battles, with groups now fighting over nominee ideology rather than qualifications. Alex Badas finds that Supreme Court nominations have become a voting issue, but that Republican voters still prioritize them more.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 21, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

How Court Nominations Polarize Interest Groups and Voters

0:00 43:30

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Science of Politics?

This episode is 43 minutes long.

When was this The Science of Politics episode published?

This episode was published on October 21, 2020.

Can I download this The Science of Politics episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!