How Data is Helping Us Understand Voting Rights After Shelby County | AshCast episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 15, 2015 · 1H 19M

How Data is Helping Us Understand Voting Rights After Shelby County | AshCast

from Audio at Harvard · host Harvard University

How has the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which upended a key provision of the Voting Rights Act and opened the door to states and local jurisdictions to rewrite voting laws, impacted voter registration and turnout? In this discussion, our panel of academics and journalists explored the potential effects of Shelby County on American voting rights. Was the Supreme Court’s reasoning empirically sound? What are the pressing challenges and problems in terms of data gathering and analysis? What can be done to further protect voting rights? Speakers Include: - Maya Sen (Moderator), Ash Center Faculty Affiliate and HKS Assistant Professor of Public Policy - Stephen Ansolabehere, Professor of Government, Harvard University - Nate Cohn, Politics and Policy Writer, The New York Times - Bernard Fraga, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Indiana University

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 15, 2015

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

How Data is Helping Us Understand Voting Rights After Shelby County | AshCast

0:00 1:19:10

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Audio at Harvard?

This episode is 1 hour and 19 minutes long.

When was this Audio at Harvard episode published?

This episode was published on April 15, 2015.

Can I download this Audio at Harvard episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!