How Hormones Control Hunger, Eating & Satiety

Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life. I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. This podcast is separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford. It is however part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science-related tools to the general public.

In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast. Our first sponsor is Inside Tracker. Inside Tracker is a personalized nutrition platform that analyzes data from your blood and DNA to help you better understand your body and help you reach your health goals. I have long been a fan of getting blood work done, and the simple reason for that is that most of the things that you want to know about your health, such as hormones, metabolic factors, blood sugar levels, etc, can only be analyzed from blood.

And nowadays there are also excellent DNA tests that can also give you valuable information about what's going on at the cellar, molecular, even the neural circuit level within your brain and body. Inside Tracker makes getting blood and DNA tests easy. You can go to a testing site where they draw your blood, they take your DNA sample, or they can come to your home if you prefer that. As well, they have a really amazing dashboard.

The dashboard lets you understand what your levels of various hormones and metabolic factors, etc, mean, and what you should do about them. I think that's one of the main things that really separates Inside Tracker apart from other blood and DNA tests. Most tests you get the results back, but there are no directives about what to do specifically in order to bring the numbers into the ranges that you would like for your goals. Inside Tracker makes all of that extremely simple and extremely clear.

If you'd like to try Inside Tracker, you can go to insidetracker.com slash Huberman, and if you do that, you'll get 25% off any of Inside Tracker's plans. Use the code Huberman at checkout. That's insidetracker.com slash Huberman to get 25% off any of Inside Tracker's plans. Today's episode is also brought to us by Athletic Greens.

Athletic Greens is an all-in-one vitamin mineral probiotic drink. I started taking Athletic Greens back in 2012, and I've taken it ever since, so I'm delighted that they're sponsoring the podcast. The reason I started taking Athletic Greens, and the reason I still take it now, is that Athletic Greens really lets me cover all my nutritional bases in terms of Vitamin's Minerals and Probiotics. There's so much data now pointing to the fact that the gut microbiome and the gut brain access is important for metabolism and for endocrine health.

The Vitamin's Minerals and Probiotics in Athletic Greens make me feel confident that I'm covering all my bases. I do take other supplements, but with Athletic Greens I know that I've got all the foundational stuff handled. It also tastes really good. It tastes fine on its own.

You can mix it with water, which is what I do. I add a little bit of lemon juice or lime juice, because I like a little tartness flavor in there as well. But most people just mix it with water. It mixes up super easily.

I drink it once or twice a day, usually once a mid-morning and once again in the afternoon. If you'd like to try Athletic Greens, you can go to AthleticGreens.com slash Huberman, and if you do that, you can claim their special offer, which is a year supply of Vitamin D3K2. There's now a ton of evidence that Vitamin D3 is involved in countless metabolic processes, hormonal processes that are important for overall health and well-being. Vitamin D3, you can get from the sun, of course, but most people are deficient in Vitamin D3.

So if you go to AthleticGreens.com slash Huberman, you'll get the Athletic Greens, you'll get the Year Supply of Vitamin D3K2, and you'll get five free travel packs. So once again, it's AthleticGreens.com slash Huberman to get Athletic Greens, the Vitamin D3K2, and that's a year supply plus the five free travel packs. Today's episode is also brought to us by Monk Pack. Monk Pack is a company that makes keto-friendly snacks that taste incredible, but have just one gram of sugar or less.

And indeed, they taste incredible. In fact, my production team here at the Huberman Lab Podcast teases me because I actually have to keep the boxes of Monk Pack bars in my basement because otherwise I'll tear through all of them. I remember the first time I tasted it, I was like, all right, here we go, a keto bar. I'm not a big fan of bars in general.

Most of them don't taste good to me. I tasted the Monk Pack bars, and they are absolutely awesome. They come in a lot of different flavors. I'm partial to the Carmel Sea Salt one, but they also have Sea Salt Dark Chocolate.

Peanut butter dark chocolate, they have a bunch of flavors. They're all incredible. I've tried them all, which is why I keep them in my basement. As I mentioned previously on this podcast, I'm neither keto nor carboe.

I don't really follow a particular guide in that sense. I eat in a way that maximizes my alertness and my levels of focus during the day when I want to work and that maximize my transition to sleep at night. So I basically eat low carb keto-ish during the day. I know the keto-nestas will say that I'm not in ketosis, and I can manage to get into ketosis, but the main idea is I keep my carbohydrates low during the day.

And then at night, I do eat carbohydrates. So for me, the Monk Pack bars are a really good snack, usually in the afternoon. Maybe with a cup of coffee, especially if I'm going to train soon after that, or if I just want to snack and I'm going to continue working. As I mentioned before, they're absolutely delicious.

They also don't have any of the stuff that's bad for you. No soy, trans fat, sugar, alcohol, artificial colors, all that stuff that we know we should avoid. If you want to try Monk Pack bars, you can go to Monk Pack. That's m-u-n-k, Monk Pack, dot com, and enter the code Huber Minute Checkout, and you'll get 20% off your first purchase of any Monk Pack product.

That's Monk Pack, m-u-n-k, p-a-c-k, dot com, and enter the code Huber Minute Checkout to get 20% off your purchase. This month, we're talking all about hormones. Hormones are incredible, and they control so many processes in the brain and body. Last episode, we talked about the role of estrogen and testosterone.

Today, we're going to talk about how hormones impact feeding and hunger, as well as satiety, the feeling that you don't want to eat, or that you've eaten enough. Now, it's important to understand that hormones don't work alone in this context. Today, I'm going to describe some hormones that have powerful effects on whether or not you want to eat more or less or stop eating altogether. But they don't do that on their own.

They do that in cooperation with the nervous system. So today, I would say as much, or perhaps even more than any other episodes, we're going to hear a lot of biology, but there are multiple what I'm going to call entry points for tools that you can apply in order to regulate your levels of hunger, your meal timing, your levels of satiety of not wanting to eat more. And many of this is actionable with behaviors, but of course, we're also going to talk about supplements, and we're actually going to talk about a little bit of brain-machine interface, devices that can actually be involved in manipulating these incredible things that we think of as hunger and appetite and satiety. So the first thing that you need to know about the nervous system side, the neural control over feeding and hunger, is that there's an area of your brain called the hypothalamus.

It's in the forebrain, which tells you it's in the front of your brain, and it's at the base of the forebrain. And the hypothalamus contains lots of different kinds of neurons doing lots of different kinds of things. There are neurons in your hypothalamus controlling sexual behavior, controlling body temperature, controlling circadian rhythms that desire to sleep or be awake, even neurons controlling rage. There are actually neurons that if we were to stimulate them would send you or anyone into a rage.

They're just powerful control centers for the brain and body. There's a particular area of a hypothalamus called the ventromedial hypothalamus. And it's one that researchers have been interested for a long time now in terms of its relationship to hunger and feeding. And the reason is, it creates these paradoxical effects.

What do I mean by that? What they found was that sometimes lesioning or disrupting the neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus would make animals or people hyperphagic. They would want to eat like crazy. And other lesions in other individuals or animals would make them anorexic.

It would make them not want to eat at all. It would make food aversive. So that means that the ventromedial hypothalamus is definitely an interesting control station for hunger and feeding and satiety. But it doesn't really tell you what's going on at a deeper level.

In fact, it's a little bit confusing or paradoxical. It turns out that there are multiple populations of neurons in there. We're going to talk about those. Some are promoting feeding and some are promoting not feeding or not eating.

Now, the other neural component of all this that you need to know about actually has to do with your mouth. So there's an area of your cortex that's a little bit further up in your brain called the insular cortex. And it processes a lot of different kinds of information, mostly information about what's going on inside you, so called interoception. The insular cortex has neurons that get input from your mouth, from the touch receptors in your mouth.

And insular cortex has powerful control over whether or not you are enjoying what you're eating, whether or not you want to avoid what you're eating, whether or not you've had enough or whether or not you want to continue eating more. And that has to do, believe it or not, with a touch or sensation of eating. I'm very familiar with this. I want these people, I love eating so much that I just like the mere act of chewing.

You know, I like celery sticks enough. I'm not crazy about them, but they taste fine to me. I like chewing on celery sticks, but I actually just like chewing on them. I could eat all day long, except that it's not healthy to do that.

But the mere act of chewing for me is very pleasurable. People who chew gum feel this way as well. And just as a point about gum or chewing, if you chew something like celery or cucumber slices or chew gum provided it doesn't have any sugar or claret content, it's not going to drive increased hunger. That generally isn't the case.

But if you eat something with sugar, as we'll find out, it has a very specific action in the insular cortex and in other areas of your nervous system that promotes the desire to eat more. But the key point right now is to know you got these two brain areas, the ventrimulial hypothalamus, that's involved in hunger and lack of hunger, so an accelerator and a break on feeding. And you have this insular cortex that gets input from your mouth and cares about chewing and the consistency of foods and all sorts of interesting things that are just very tactile. I think most people think about the touch receptors on excuse me, the taste receptors on the tongue, but we often don't think about the touch or tactile essence of food.

The thing that comes to mind just now is I've gone to sushi several times and some people really like the urchin. I don't like the urchin. There's something about it kind of creeps me out about the consistency. Other people love it.

So it's highly individual and it's probably learned and there's some probably cultural background to this. If you were raised eating urchin, some people love that consistency or that touch. So touch has a lot to do with whether or not you want to eat or not. Now, let's get back to the ventrimulial hypothalamus.

Sometimes it makes animals or people want to eat more, sometimes less. So what's going on there? There's a classic experiment that was done in which researchers took two rats and so-called parabios to them to each other. What that meant is that they did a little surgery and they linked their blood supply so that they were forever physically linked to one another and could exchange factors in the blood.

But their brains were separate, their mouths were separate, and they essentially did everything separately except that they were linked to one another. So they'd walk together and go to the same places in order to do it. This parabiosis experiment revealed something really important. When they lesioned the ventrimulial hypothalamus in one of the rats that was connected to the other rat, that rat got there.

That rat got very, very fat. It's just really obese, huge rat, super rat, jumbo rat. The other one, however, got very thin. It actually lost weight despite consuming the same amount of food that it had prior to the other one getting lesion.

So what does this tell us? This tells us that there's something in the blood that's being exchanged between the two animals because it was their blood supply that was linked. And that tells us that there's hormone or endocrine signals that are involved in the desire to eat and hunger and appetite. And so next we're going to talk about what those endocrine signals are.

And then I'm going to immediately point to some entry points that you can use. You can use these even if you're not parabiosis to anything. And that can allow you to time your meal frequency and predict when you're going to be hungry or not. As well as drive up appetite.

Believe it or not, there are people out there who are trying to eat more. Although I think many more people are trying to eat less because nowadays the data just went to the fact that there is essentially an epidemic of diabetes, type 2 diabetes and obesity. And most everyone agrees now that maintaining a healthy body weight and body weight composition is one of the best path to longevity and to just feeling very good and actually being able to think. Cognitive functioning is actually linked to levels of adipose tissue and so forth.

So let's talk about the endocrine factors that regulate feeding hunger and tidy. One of the really exciting things to emerge in the science of feeding and appetite in the last 20 years is the discovery of another brain area, not just the ventromedial hypothalamus, but it's an area of the brain called the Arquiuit nucleus. And the Arquiuit nucleus has some really fascinating sets of neurons that release even more incredible molecules and chemicals into the blood. And these chemicals act as accelerators on feeding and appetite or breaks.

And the really cool thing is that you can actually control these molecules through simple behaviors. And once you understand what these molecules are, you'll start to understand why that's the case and the control points that you have right now in order to control your appetite in either direction, increase or decrease. So first of all, there are a set of neurons in this Arquiuit nucleus called the PMOC neurons. I don't want to get into what the acronym stands for, but I'll do it anyway.

It's the Pro-OPO-Mylanocortin system. So these are PMOC neurons, Pro-OPO-Mylanocortin. And if you heard Milano, that should tell you it has something to do with pigmentation in skin cells or in hair cells, pigmentation of some sort because of melanin. Last episode, I talked a little bit about the relationship between light, dopamine, and melanin.

So you should already be thinking, wait, Milano means it probably has something to do with that system and indeed it does. Now, the POMC neurons make something called alpha-MSH. Milanistite stimulating hormone, alpha-malanocytes stimulating hormone. If you don't want to remember any of the other acronyms in terms I've talked about this episode so far, do try and remember MSH.

Okay, mouse, Sam, hamster, MSH. Okay, MSH reduces appetite. And it's a powerful molecule. So just put that on the shelf.

MSH reduces appetite. Now, there's another population of neurons in the argument nucleus called the AGRP neurons. And there I'm truly not going to read you what that stands for because it's related to the mouse strain it was first identified in, but humans make these cells as well. But AGRP neurons.

The AGRP neurons stimulate eating. And anytime you are approaching food or you feel some excitement about food or anxiety because some people actually experience a kind of heightened anxiety. Some people actually get a little bit of a resting tremor before they eat. Even if they don't have any sort of eating disorder, there's kind of a ramping up of autonomic activity.

That's largely due to the activity of these AGRP neurons. So the activity in these AGRP neurons goes way up when animals or people are starved. And I don't mean starved for long periods of time, but I mean when they haven't eaten for a while. And the activity of MSH, the release of MSH goes up when we've eaten.

However, there are other things that will stimulate the release of things like MSH. So just briefly, the experimental evidence. If you kill AGRP neurons, animals and people stop eating. There are people that have leashed and they just stop eating.

They become an anorexic. That's actually, I know you're familiar with anorexia as a clinical term, but that's actually a term that's used in the scientific literature. About a pattern of behavior, okay, as well as a clinical term, of course. If you were to stimulate the AGRP neurons, animals or people eat like crazy.

They will eat to the point where they burst, which just sounds horrible, but it just tells you this is the accelerator on eating. And yes, as a relationship to the ventral medial hypothalamus I talked about earlier, but I don't want to go back there just yet. We will circle back. So, melanocytes stimulating hormone, such an interesting hormone.

This thing can shut down the desire to eat. The melanocytes stimulating hormone is released from the medial pituitary. We talked about the pituitary last time. This is a gland that is very closely positioned to the hypothalamus.

Actually, some of the hypothalamus neurons actually project their neural connections directly into the pituitary to release things like gonadotropins and luteinizing hormone. Stuff we talked about last time in reference to testosterone and estrogen. But MSH is released from the medial portion of the pituitary. And it stimulates the desire to not eat, to cease eating.

What's really interesting is that melanocyte stimulating hormone is activated by ultraviolet light. And it's not activated by ultraviolet light to the skin or directly to the pituitary. It's activated by ultraviolet light to the eyes. Now, if you've been watching this podcast or listening to this podcast for any period of time or you've heard me on other podcasts or you follow my Instagram, I am a big fan of this whole thing of getting morning light in order to synchronize circadian rhythms, etc.

of waiting light in the middle of the night. This is yet another reason why getting ample light, ideally sunlight, but it could be other sources of UV light to the eyes, stimulates MSH. This has been shown over and over again and keeps the desire to eat or appetite in check in healthy ranges. This is also why in the spring and summer months, animals and people eat less.

Now, for hibernating animals, it's different because the bare hibernating actually bears don't truly hibernate technically by scientific criteria. They don't hibernate, but they go into a kind of torpor. The hibernating animals, they don't eat much because they're in burrows or dens or they're just wrapped up in a wall or whatever it is that hibernating animals do. So they're of course going to eat far less in the winter, but that's a unique scenario.

We are not hibernating animals, but humans generally have greater appetite in the cold winter months. It's not just because of the holidays and the abundance of food that we're presenting ourselves with, but when we get a lot of sun, our appetite is reduced or at least it's easier to control. And that is due in part because if you're getting ample sunlight to the eyes, it's converted into a signal for the MSH neurons, the neurons that release MSH, excuse me, these palm-scene neurons release MSH, and then MSH can bind its receptors and can keep the break on appetite in check. So the takeaway tool from this is make sure you're getting enough light, not just in the morning, but throughout the day, and yes, it has to be light to your eyes and blasting your eyes with sunlight or artificial light to the point where it's damaging or painful won't accelerate or improve this process.

It's about getting photons, ultraviolet light to the eyes consistently throughout the day. That's best accomplished by not wearing sunglasses provided you can do that safely, and if you don't have access to enough sunlight, then you can do this with artificial light. This also points again to our old friends, the Blue Blockers. Many people know I'm not a huge fan of Blue Blockers, especially not during the daytime because they block a lot of the UV and shorter wavelength light that you want and need to create alertness, but also to create release of MSH from the media pituitary.

Now, there are people out there, subcultures, that actually inject MSH, that are taking MSH or things similar to it. I'm not suggesting people do that, but there are three main consequences of doing that. First of all, it reduces appetite, no surprise there, they're actually using it as a dieting drug, this is kind of in the underground, I don't know what the legal status is, and again, I'm not promoting people do it. Two, it makes them very, very tan, which makes sense, right?

Milanocyte stimulating hormone. And the third is it purportedly, never tried it, purportedly sends libido through the roof, so the point where it's actually distracting for other activities. It actually can create pre-epism, which is a kind of chronic erection in males, so the point where it can be physically damaging to the genitalia. So, this is a drug of, or I don't know whether or not it's called a drug, it's a substance that one can regulate with healthy levels with sunlight and perhaps artificial UV light.

I have not heard much about treatments for obesity involving getting ample sunlight or getting ample UV light, but to me, the logic is just very clear. And so, if you're pursuing those avenues, you certainly should talk to your physician, but you might want to think about how some of those logic hangs together. Absolutely fascinating hormone, I think most people aren't aware of it. And the subcultures that are aware of it are using it to very particular endpoints, and they're using it at super physiological levels.

That's enough about that, because I really don't know. I've talked to a few people in research, believe it or not, but I've reached out to a few people and asked whether or not these side effects, in air quotes, I've heard about are true and indeed they're true. But again, that's super physiological. Controlling MSH, it's actually alpha MSH levels through viewing ultraviolet light seems like an interesting and mechanistically logical thing to do if your goal is to keep appetite in check.

So, MSH inhibits hunger. Next, let's talk about a hormone peptide that activates hunger. And this is a really interesting one, because it relates to when you get hungry, in addition to the fact that you get hungry at all. And it's called ghrelin.

It's spelled G-H-R-E-L-I-N. ghrelin is released actually from the GI tract, and its main role is to increase your desire to eat. And it does that through a variety of mechanisms. Part of that is to stimulate some of the brain areas, the actual neurons, that make you want to eat.

In addition, it creates food anticipatory signals within your nervous system. So, you start thinking about the things that you happen to like to eat at that particular time of day. This is fascinating. ghrelin is sort of like a clock, a hormonal clock that makes you want to eat at particular times.

Now, the signal for ghrelin is reduced glucose levels in the blood. We're going to talk a lot today about glucose and insulin, ways to manage glucose and insulin. But for now, the simple version of this is you normally want your glucose to be in a kind of modest range, and I'll explain what that range is in a little bit. But if it drops too low, ghrelin is secreted from your gut.

It activates neurons in your brain at various locations, including the PMOC neurons and the other neurons of the arcuate. It also activates the VMH in particular ways, and it might even activate some of these neurons that are in the periphery. In your mouth, it actually makes you kind of salivate and want to eat. We all know about the famous Pavlovian experiments, Pavlox dogs.

They start salivating to the bell after the bell was presented with food, remove the food, and then just the bell can stimulate the salivation. We become Pavlovian at times. But rarely has it ever discussed what the neural pathways for that are. It turns out that these hormones that are secreted from the gut can stimulate the neurons to create a sensation and a desire for certain foods at certain times of day.

You've done this experiment. If you are somebody who eats breakfast at more or less the same time each day, let's say 8 a.m. plus or minus 20 minutes, and then you eat lunch at 1230 plus or minus 20 minutes. Or let's say you're somebody like me who typically skips breakfast and just eats lunch usually around 1130 or 12 or something like that.

Your ghrelin secretion will start to match when you typically eat. And it does that, and it's able to override the low levels of glucose in your bloodstream because the ghrelin system also gets input from a clock in your liver that is linked to the clock in your hypothalamus in your brain. And what this means is if you eat at regular meal times, you'll start to get hungry a few minutes before those meals times. If you've ever wondered why your stomach kind of starts to growl because it's a particular time of day, I'm like, oh, I must want to eat.

Well, that's ghrelin. And for those of you that don't know why your stomach growls, I'll also tell you that today. It's actually really interesting. It's not at all what you expect, and it's not just a gurgling of liquids in your stomach.

That's not what it is. It's actually a muscular phenomenon. So ghrelin is secreted as a kind of food anticipatory signal to get you motivated to go eat at regular times. So nowadays, there's a lot of interest in intermittent fasting.

There's also a lot of interest in just what meal plans and schedules and what to eat in general in order to maximize one's health and wellbeing. And people have all sorts of cosmetic reasons and brain reasons and metabolic reasons for wanting to control this kind of stuff. So let's make it really simple by first looking at the extremes. Some people need to eat every two or three hours.

They think of this. I need to eat every two or three hours or else their blood sugar drops. In general, blood sugar doesn't drop so low that they truly need to eat in order to alleviate a blood sugar issue. Although sometimes that can happen.

Some people are truly hypoglycemic, low blood sugar. But most people as the blood sugar starts to head down towards the low-ish ranges, ghrelin is secreted. And so for those people not eating on the clock is very disruptive to them because it activates these neurons in the brain. For people who eat once a day or twice a day or tend to shift their meals, they might eat a lot, but during a limited so-called feeding window.

It's kind of interesting humans now eat and talk about foods and ways that for years I used to hear about in classes and courses and research lectures about feeding animals, restricted feeding windows. And we owe a great deal of gratitude to Sachin Panda, who was a colleague of mine when my lab was in San Diego at the Salk Institute, who really is one of the pioneers of this restricted feeding window work and has done a beautiful work. He has a book that's excellent called the circadian code that I highly recommend. And he's done a lot of important work on neurons in the retina that control circadian timing, but also the relationship between feeding windows and health.

And he's sort of the major proponent out there among the major proponents that should say of circadian eating. That means eating during the daytime at night or intermittent fasting, restricting feeding windows to anywhere from four to six to eight hours. I'll use myself as an example of the transition from regular feeding schedule to more intermittent-ish fasting, although I don't really fall into true intermittent fasting. So I was one of these people that just got so accustomed to waking up and eating about an hour after I woke up that to go from eating every three or four hours to eating twice a day, lunch and dinner, maybe a couple snacks in the afternoon or something.

At first was excruciating. I remember thinking like, this is really brutal, pushing out, feeding. I didn't think I could exercise unless I had eaten first. We now know that during most all forms of exercise, unless you're really focused on optimal performance, like you've got a hitkey lift or you have to sprint at your maximum speed.

And maybe even then, that you can exercise fast at just fine because you're mainly relying on sources like glycogen from the liver, some undigested food, sometimes as gross as that my semen is true, as well as body fat if the exercise is out is extremely long. But what that means is that if you suddenly go from eating on a very regular schedule to skipping a meal or pushing your meal timing out or shifting at all, you're going to have ghrelin in your system and that ghrelin is going to stimulate the desire to eat by acting at the level of your brain. And it is indeed at that point just mental. When we hear about just mental, just physical, it's really kind of the same thing because it's all chemicals, brain and body.

But it's the stimulation of neurons that anticipate feeding. You're stimulating the arcuate nucleus neurons that make you want to eat those AGRP neurons. So ghrelin stimulates the AGRP neurons, which makes you want to eat. So what can you do with this?

What this means is if you want to start shifting your feeding schedule to one where you're not eating quite as frequently, and there are some advantages to that that aren't just in the biochemistry and health related, you know, cellular health related things. But some of them include not having to think about or buy food, right? You actually don't have to think about food all day if you're not eating so often. The other is it gives you far more social flexibility, right?

You can go to a noon meeting if you have to, or you can go out to dinner at a particular time. And I guess it makes it kind of tough if you want to meet somebody for breakfast because then you're the dork who's just like sipping black coffee and like refusing everything. But anyway, I've been that dork. So it's one of those things you just kind of work with.

But the fact of the matter is ghrelin secretion, because of its relationship to the nervous system, can be shifted by about 45 minutes per day. Now it's going to vary. Some of you have more so-called willpower, you know. But if you really want to just start pushing that first meal out or shifting it in any direction, some of you might want to eat in the early part of the day and not in the evening, trying to shift the meal times out the space is not going to be in the early part of the day.

So what this would look like is if you normally eat breakfast at eight o'clock plus or minus 20 minutes and you want to start eating your first meal at noon, you would take maybe four or five days and just start pushing the meal out by about 45 minutes to an hour each day. So it's not quite as painful. Or you can just take the plunge and just do it all at once. I have a colleague who was a neurosurgeon at Stanford came up through my lab.

He's now at Neuralink. And he has a great practice. He keeps his ghrelin system at random. What he does is he skips one meal per day and he makes his external schedules.

Take that. So sometimes he skips breakfast. Sometimes he skips lunch. Sometimes he skips dinner.

He just skips one of the three major meals per day. And in doing that, the ghrelin system is always kind of kept off kilter. And it probably also allows him to have a lot of neural flexibility. What we call top-down control, just the knowledge.

Oh, you know, the hunger I'm feeling isn't necessarily hypoglycemia. And in his case, it's almost certainly not. And therefore, what I'm feeling here is an activation of these AGRP neurons. And therefore, I can push my meal schedule around however I want.

Now, I should mention that top-down mechanisms are powerful. Belief motivation. These things can really shift neural circuits. We're going to talk more about that a little bit later.

But there are also people who are genuinely hypoglycemic and that need to take really good control of their blood sugar levels and try and keep them stable. And so, of course, you want to do what's medically safe for you. I'm not at all recommending that people that suffer from hypoglycemia suddenly disrupt their blood sugar patterns in any direction. That wouldn't be healthy.

But for most people out there who have reasonable blood glucose levels, it's kind of interesting and kind of fun to play with these parameters in order to optimize what you want to do. And sometimes that might change across the year with schedules. Many people find great benefit in having flexibility over when they eat. Regularity of eating equals regularity of ghrelin secretion equals regularity of activity of these AGRP neurons, meaning you will be hungry at very regular intervals.

So that's something that you can work with. It's grounded in deep mechanism of hormone and neural systems. And there's a lot of modern research to support what I just said. So if MSH inhibits feeding, makes us want to eat less, and ghrelin makes us want to eat more, there's another hormone called CCK, choliecystikinin, that is potent in reducing our levels of hunger.

Now, I learned about CCK back when I was an undergraduate, so well over 20 years ago, when it was first discovered. And there was a lot of excitement about CCK at that point as a diet drug. You know, anytime there's a molecule or a chemical discovered in the brain or body that can suppress feeding, the diet industry just goes wild, and this is going to be the thing that's going to allow people to move from being obese to losing all sorts of unhealthy weight, etc. A similar phenomenon was observed with leptin.

Leptin is a hormone that's made by body fat that signals to the brain when there's a lot of body fat, and in animals, injections of leptin can make fat animals thin. They lose a lot of adipose or fat. In humans, it didn't work out that way. It just, the studies were done, and leptin was successful in treating a certain rare form of diabetes, but it really wasn't very potent as an anti-obesity drug.

Similarly, CCK has been looked at as an obesity drug, something to reduce obesity, but it had some pretty unhappy side effects, actually caused some pretty serious side effects. Now, that's as a drug. However, CCK, when released at normal levels by your gut, has a powerful effect in suppressing appetite for a period of time, and there are healthy and direct ways to activate CCK. Now, CCK is in the GI tract.

It's released from the GI tract, and its release is governed by two things. One is a subset of very specialized neurons that detect what's in the gut, the specific contents of the gut, and by certain elements of the mucus lining of the gut and the gut microbiome. So, what's really interesting is that CCK is stimulated by fatty acids, and particular fatty acids that we'll talk about, amino acids, and particular amino acids that we'll talk about, as well as by sugar. Now, let's put sugar on the shelf for a moment.

We're going to talk a lot about sugar, because if CCK inhibits appetite and reduces feeding, and it can be triggered by fatty acids, amino acids, or sugars, then you might say, well, then eating a lot of sugar should make us not want to eat more, but we all know that eating sugar makes us want to eat far more. That's the role of a lot of sugars, and that has to do with a separate mechanism we'll talk about today. So, which fatty acids in the gut stimulate the release of CCK? It turns out it's the omega-3 fatty acids, the ones that come from algae or krill or fish oil.

I talked about this in the episode on nutrition, and some of the things related to the gut microbiome, and I'm going to revisit that now. Omega-3 fatty acids, and conjugated linoleic acid, CLA, either from food or from supplements, stimulate the release of CCK, which then reduces or at least blunts appetite. And I'm not talking about blunting appetite to anorexic levels where you don't want to eat it all. I'm talking about regulating appetite to the point where animals and people don't over-consume, so it's keeping appetite at a healthy level.

The other thing that stimulates CCK that I mentioned are amino acids. So, when we eat, we have the ability to break down different macronutrients, carbohydrates, fats, proteins into sugars and glucose, and then we can convert ATP and all that stuff from the Krebs cycle from high school. We're not going to go into that today. That's for a future episode.

But amino acids are one of the things that we are eating for. Amino acids both can be used as energy through a process called gluconeogenesis of converting proteins into energy, or those amino acids can be broken down and then rebuilt into things like repairing muscle tissue, as well as other forms of cellular repair, involved in all sorts of things related proteins, synthesis. What does this mean? If we eat the proper amino acids at the proper levels, if we ingest omega threes and CLA's conjugated linoleic acids at the proper levels or get them from supplements, there's a blunting of appetite.

Appetite is kept clamped and we don't become hyperphagic. We don't overeat. We tend to eat within healthy or normal ranges. So, this is very important because most people don't understand that when we're eating, we are basically fat foraging and amino acid foraging.

And there are several studies now have shown that people and animals will essentially eat until they feel they've consumed enough of omega threes, of megasixes, CLA, and CLA. In other words, even if it's not conscious, we are eating until we trigger the activation of CCK. Now, there are other reasons why we shut down eating too. Literally the volume of food in our gut can be large and we can feel very distended.

That's the physical reason, obviously. There are other reasons. Maybe we just have top-down control. We have knowledge that this is the end of the meal and we stop because we have to go back to work or to a meeting or tell ourselves that we've had enough.

But at a subconscious level, the gut is informing the brain via CCK and other mechanisms when we've ingested enough of what we need. And these omega threes and CLA's and certain amino acids are vital for sending out that signal that we've had enough. Now, which amino acids is actually really interesting? We have essential amino acids and we have nonessential amino acids.

Among the essential amino acids, there's one in particular that can trigger the release of CCK very potently. And that's glutamine. Glutamine is a very interesting amino acid. First of all, it's been shown in a few studies to play a role in bolstering the immune system.

It can increase the number of killer cells in the immune system. It is consumed by in supplement form. People can take it a teaspoon of glutamine or some people take glutamine throughout the day. If they're really into it or for whatever reason they think they're battling off an infection or something of that sort, glutamine can also of course be derived from foods.

And you can just put into the internet, put into an internet search and find out what foods are rich with glutamine. Some of the ones that I'm aware of off the top of my head are cottage cheese and things of that sort. But other foods have glutamine as well. Once a threshold level of glutamine and other essential amino acids are reached, once the threshold level of these alpha-3, excuse me, omega-3 fatty acids and CLA's are reached, CCK is released and it helps reduce the activity of those agrp neurons that promote feeding.

So as you can see, feeding is an interplay between brain and body. And it's some of the micronutrients and even the breakdown of particular nutrients that's putting the accelerator or the break on the feeding process. It's not just one thing. So from an actionable standpoint, you, we should probably all be trying to get our omega-3 omega-6 ratios correct anyway because they are anti-depressant.

I talked about the peer reviewed studies on that. They are healthy for the gut microbiome and we should be seeking sufficient glutamine. Now whether or not you decide to supplement with glutamine or not is up to you. One of the reasons why one might want to do that, and again you should always check with a doctor, especially if you have any predisposition to cancers or you have cancer, many cancers and tumors like glutamine.

So that's something to note. But one reason why you might want to supplement with glutamine or consider eating foods that are rich in glutamine isn't just to keep your appetite in healthy ranges, but as well, glutamine can actually reduce sugar cravings. So this is very interesting. I have a friend.

He's an absolute chocolate sweet addict. He's a grown adult, but he eats candy and chocolate as if he was like a 14-year-old kid hanging out at the local convenience store. It's really incredible. And he has probably a sugar addiction, but he's very aware of this and he's managed to kick all other addictions.

So for whatever reason, it stimulates his brain and body in the ways that make him want more, but he hates this. It's actually quite frustrating for him and he's somebody who cares a lot about his health. He took the approach that I know many other people have who know about this role of glutamine of taking a teaspoon or a couple teaspoons of glutamine several times throughout the day or any time he craves sugar. And indeed, glutamine will reduce sugar cravings.

Some people who are really on the ketogenic front will mix it with a little half and half and down that because I guess it makes it taste better. It's a little bit chalky. So glutamine has some very interesting properties. But I think for most people that aren't suffering from adverse levels of craving, making sure you're getting the right omega-3s that can come from a variety of sources, check out the episode we did on nutrition, if you want to learn more about that, and CLAs.

And making sure that you're getting enough glutamine is going to be important for making sure that the CCK signal gets through. The one thing I do want to mention about glutamine, it's a minor effect, but it alone can have a small increase, excuse me, it alone can increase blood sugar. It's not a huge increase in blood glucose, but because the gut takes proteins and breaks them down into these amino acids and essentially looking for glutamine and things like it, other essential amino acids as well. When you ingest glutamine or branched chain amino acids, there is a small but real increase in blood glucose.

And that's because they are essentially food. And there I'm talking about the supplemental version. So just know, glutamine can increase blood sugar slightly, especially diabetic, should know that. It can reduce sugar cravings.

And just know that what your gut is doing at a core level is it's foraging, it's waiting, and it's trying to assess levels of omega-3 fatty acid, conjugated linoleic acid, and glutamine and other essential amino acids, you are essentially trying to eat to get these nutrients and then a signal can be deployed up to your brain that you're not really interested in eating that much more. Whenever preparing an episode for this podcast, I'm always faced with a particular challenge, which is how many tools should I offer that involve doing something new? You know, new behavior or new exercise, supplements, something, things of that sort, and how many should be related to not doing things avoiding things? It's never really fun to talk about all the things that we're supposed to avoid, but some of them are so powerful in light of the mechanisms of a given topic that I'd be remiss if I didn't mention them.

So now you understand how hormones and peptides like CCK and ghrelin impact appetite. There's one particular aspect of food that can powerfully impact CCK, and I think most people, I'm guessing 99.9% of people out there are not aware of this. And it has to do with highly processed foods. There's a lot of reasons why one would want to avoid highly processed foods.

In fact, if you're interested in that topic in the history of whole foods transitioning to highly processed foods in this country, I highly recommend you listen to a YouTube video by Dr. Robert Lustig, he's at the University of California San Francisco. It's very easy to find, put Stanford, Robert Lustig. It was a talk hosted by Stanford.

It gives a beautiful description of the history of this and why the food industry started packing in additional sugars and salts and turning foods into commodities. It's really fascinating. It has no conspiracy theory. It's just all scientific facts.

It's really a wonderful exercise. Millions of views should be very easy to find. We can provide a link to that and we will. There's another reason to avoid highly processed foods, however.

And that has to do with what's called emulsifiers. Now, many of you are familiar with emulsifiers, even though you don't know it. When you put detergent in the laundry, that is a goal of that detergent is to bring together fatty molecules with water molecules and be able to dissociate them and break them up to get the stains out of clothes and things of that sort. There are a lot of emulsifiers put into processed foods.

And those emulsifiers allow certain chemical reactions to occur that extends the shelf life of those foods. So it's like candy bars and cereals and all sorts of things that are in processed foods, the worst of which are the typical kind of pastries that you see at the convenience store, but this extends into chips of various kinds and even some meats of various kinds. They pack the stuff into meats. They have names like soy lecithin and other things.

Why are emulsifiers bad? Okay, there are a lot of reasons why they're bad, but the reason why they're bad for the mechanisms that we've been talking about today is that when you ingest those foods, you're bringing those emulsifiers into your gut. And those emulsifiers strip away the mucosal lining of the gut and they actually cause the neurons that innervate the gut that extend those little processes we call axons into the gut to retract deeper into the gut. And as a consequence, you're ingesting a bunch of food and the signals like CCK never get deployed.

The signals that actually shut down hunger are never actually triggered. And so as a consequence, you want to eat far more of these highly processed foods. In addition, if you then go from eating a highly processed food to non highly processed foods, you're not able to measure the amounts of amino acid sugars and fatty acids in those foods as accurately. You've actually done structural damage at a micro level, but structural level damage, excuse me, to the mucosal lining of the gut.

Now, this can all be repaired if you stay away from highly processed foods for some period of time, but the negative effects of these emulsifiers are quite real. So to make it really clean and simple, emulsifiers from highly processed foods are limiting your gut's ability to detect what's in the foods you eat and therefore to deploy the satiety signals, the signals that shut down hunger. In addition to that, there's a parallel mechanism at play that I talked about in a previous episode, but I'll remind you again that you have neurons in your gut that are sensing sugar and are sending a subconscious signal up to the brain via the vagus nerve. And those neurons trigger the release of dopamine, which makes you crave more of that food.

So now you've got parallel signals making you want to eat more sugar, making you unaware of how much sugar you've eaten and that are disrupting the inputs to the nervous system that signal to the rest of your brain and body that you've obtained enough fatty acids and you've obtained enough amino acids. So these highly processed foods are really terrible. And, you know, I'm not out here to say, you know, never enjoy a processed food of any kind of a hypocrite because I do eat processed foods from time to time. Although the ones that I tend to eat, I try and make up the healthier variety, but eating whole foods has tremendous value and eating highly processed food has tremendous negative impact.

On the gut and on the gut brain axis. And so recently there was a paper that came out in cell, cell press journal, it's kind of the apex of cell journals, which is phenomenal. This paper showed that ingesting highly processed food leads to more intake of not just highly processed foods, but other types of food in general. There was kind of an overeating compensation generally across foods for people that consume these highly processed foods.

And there are a lot of other reasons to avoid highly processed foods. So again, I don't like to focus too much on the do nots. I like to arm you with tools to do. But I think this visual of certain foods in these emulsifiers actually stripping away some of the critical lining of your gut and disrupting the hormone signaling to the brain controlling.

Feeding is important enough and cryptic enough, meaning it hasn't been talked about. It works at a subconscious level and that it's important that people are aware of it so they can make decisions about what they do want to eat or not want to eat for themselves. Before moving on, I just want to say one more thing about highly processed foods. There was an absolutely beautiful study done by my colleague Chris Garner at Stanford exploring whether or not certain diets were better than others.

They looked at vegan, vegetarian, omnivore. I don't know if they looked at all meat or not, but they looked at the different forms of diets, intermittent fasting, etc. And they essentially found that whichever diet people adhered to, whichever one they followed, was equivalent to the others provided that they followed it. They lost the equivalent amount of weight.

There really wasn't a strong effect of the food type or the pattern of eating, etc. However, in a study like that, adherence is very high because people are part of a study. And for many people, the ability to adhere to a certain eating plan is one of the most, if not the most powerful determinants of whether or not a diet meaning nutritional plan works. Now, this thing about highly processed foods, however, is really diabolical because it truly says, and I think the recent data in some of the data.

And the recent data in some metabolism and other journals really proves that a calorie is not a calorie. That's absolutely absurd because of these emulsifiers and the contents of these highly processed foods. In fact, the data in humans points to this. So what they did is they took inpatient adults, so they had total control over their food intake, and they received either ultra processed or unprocessed diets for 14 days of a short study.

The diets were matched for calories, sugar, fat, fiber, and macronutrients. So everything else was matched as processed or non processed is the major variable. And basically what they found is that the people who were eating the processed food diet happened to eat much more. This was after this period of putting them on either diet and clamping for all other variables, then they would eat much more, and the body weight changes were much more.

And those body weight changes were such that they couldn't be accounted for by just increased calories. So the bottom line is that highly processed foods are just bad for you. They increase weight gain. They disrupt the lining of your gut in a way that disrupts things like CCK and proper satiety signals.

And they contain a bunch of things in particular sugars, but other things as well, that disrupt not just the hormonal systems, but also the neural systems that control the desire. And they're not going to eat after the diet is done. So there's just so many reasons why these highly processed foods are terrible, and they can explain a lot of the ill health effects that we've seen in the last 50 years, not just in the United States, but all over the world. The enormous increase in diabetes, juvenile diabetes, it's just remarkable how far down the path of dad we've gone.

And it's clear it's almost a smoking gun, what the cause of this is. If you'd like to learn more about that, please refer to the Lustig lecture. He also spells out why non processed foods is far more economical in terms of just at the level of the householder individual, as well as at the societal level. Really interesting stuff.

I highly recommend you check it out. So now let's move on to some other hormones that regulate hunger and satiety. In particular, insulin. Now, you've probably heard of insulin before.

Insulin is the thing that's lacking in type 1 diabetics. That's why they have to inject insulin whenever they eat. The reason they have to do that is because when they eat, their foods are broken down into glucose. And in order to shuttle glucose to the appropriate tissues in the body, and also to keep glucose levels in check, you need insulin.

So the simplest way to think about insulin and glucose is that when you eat, that food is broken down into sugars. That's true whether or not it's fats or it's sugars or eventually if it's proteins. They're oxidized into fuels, as we say. And those fuels can be used as the name fuel implies into energy.

They're eventually made into ATP. There's a bunch of biochemical steps that we're not going to go into today. But that's essentially how it works. You break down food into glucose.

Now, if you're ketogenic, we'll talk about that in a little bit. But in general, you eat food is turned into glucose. Your blood sugar needs to be kept in a particular range. Hypoglycemic means too low.

Hyperglycemic means too high. And what they call you glycemic, E-U glycemic, is the healthy range. Now, what those healthy ranges are, in general, the healthy range, the euglycemic range is about 70 to 100 nanograms per deciliter. But most of you aren't walking around with a glucose monitor.

Some of you are, but most of you are not. The more important question for us to address right now is why is it important that glucose be kept at a particular level? Once you understand that, keeping glucose in check starts to have a rationale behind it, and the ways to do that start to make a lot more sense. So the reason is, if glucose levels get too high because of the way that our cells in particular neurons interact with glucose, high levels of glucose can damage neurons.

It can actually kill them. You can start getting what are called peripheral, perifrol, excuse me, neuropathies. One of the symptoms of some forms of diabetes is that people start losing the sensation of touch in their fingers or their hands or their feet, and they can start going blind. There's diabetic retinopathy.

So it's very important that insulin manage your glucose levels. Now, there's also type 2 diabetes where there's insulin secreted from the pancreas, but people are insulin insensitive. There's a disruption in the receptors, and insulin insensitivity isn't quite the same as having no insulin at all, but it parallels some of the same mechanisms. Now, type 1 diabetes is often picked up because someone has a sudden weight loss because they're not processing blood sugar the same way they were before.

Type 2 diabetes is often, although not always associated with being overweight and with obesity. Both of them are challenging conditions. Type 2 diabetes almost always can be managed by managing one's weight. And of course, there are prescription drugs and supplements that can help manage those.

We're going to talk about all of that. But for most people that don't have diabetes, the important thing is to manage glucose, to keep it in that euglycemic range. And there are a number of different ways to do that. Some of them are behavioral.

Some of them are diet-based. And some of them are based on supplements or prescription drugs. So let's talk about those now. So if you eat, and in particular if you eat carbohydrates, blood glucose goes up.

If you eat fats, blood glucose goes up to a far less degree. And if you eat proteins, depending on the protein, it'll eventually be broken down for fuel or assembled into amino acid chains for protein synthesis and repair of other tissues and bodily functions. But glucose goes up and then is kept in range. When you are hungry, you secrete a different hormone, and that's called glucagon.

And glucagon's main role is to pull stores of energy out of the liver and the muscles. And once those are depleted, you'll eventually tap into body fat. So, and this is for people that have a typical blood glucose range, so that 70 to 100 euglycemic range. So the two kind of push and pull systems that we're going to think about now to keep this simple is that you have the insulin system managing glucose.

And you've got the glucagon system pulling energy out of your liver and muscles for immediate fuel. And eventually, you'll pull fuel out of body fat, if you've been active for a very long time. And all your glycogen stores are depleted or close to depleted. So, what does this all mean?

There's a lot of important biochemistry and a lot of important cellular processes involved in whether or not you're anabolic or catabolic, or not you're breaking things down or building things up. Let's talk about feeding in a simpler way, however. And let's weave the tools to manage blood glucose to keep it in check as we do that. So, let's say you had a meal, and that meal consisted of rice, a carbohydrate, some meat or fish, let's say a piece of salmon, and some vegetable, some fibrous vegetable, like asparagus or cabbage or something like that.

If you were to eat all of that at once, you take a bite of one, a bite of the other, you'll have to mix it up, you know, one of these all ends up in the same place kind of people, mix it all up, then you'll experience an increase in insulin and increase in blood glucose that's moderately fast. It's going to increase pretty quickly. What's remarkable is that the order that you consume each macronutrient has a pretty profound influence on the rate of insulin and glucose secretion into the blood and how quickly those levels rise. So, if you want to make it really simple, if you were to eat the rice first, your glucose would rise in a sharp spike, especially if it doesn't contain any fats to slow the absorption.

Now, that might be good if you're very hungry, and you want to get an increase in glucose. In fact, this is the reason why you're often served bread before meals, because sometimes it's bread and butter, but chips before meals are appetizer, are designed to get your blood glucose going up high because big steep increases in blood glucose tend to promote the desire to consume more glucose. And this also relates to the dopamine system in the way that something tasty in the mouth and sugar in the gut and fats and sugars in the mouth, sugar the activation of a lot of systems in the brain and body to consume more of whatever you have, or whatever is available to you. So, the basic idea is that eating carbohydrates and or fats early in a meal will give a steep rise in blood glucose.

However, if you were to eat the fibrous thing first, so a lot of chewing, but not a big rise in blood glucose because in general, there's unless it's late in sugar or something, we're just talking about some vegetable, fibrous vegetable, that will actually blunt the release of glucose until you eat the fish and the rice, but believe it or not, it will actually blunt the glucose increase that the rice would cause. Now, I'm not talking about neurotically eating each macronutrient separately in sequence. I'm just trying to give you a picture of what's happening ordinarily. So what this means is if you feel a lot of food related anxiety or you feel you're one of these people that you can kind of sense like your blood sugar increasing very quickly, a lot of people can sense this, some people can't, has a lot to do with how well they manage their blood sugar as well as some of the psychological factors.

And yes, there are family and historical reasons, we know I've got friends who had a lot of siblings and when they sit down to eat, they have to really suppress the desire to not beat up everyone else at the table and take all the food. It's sort of like not, it's hard for them to understand that there's plenty to go around because of their upbringing. So there are psychological top-down effects. A lot of the psychology around food is geared towards getting people to be relaxed when they eat and these sorts of things.

But these blood sugar effects are real, just cellar and basic biochemistry of how the body manages sugars ingested into the blood. So what does this all mean? It means that if you want a steep increase in glucose, you are very, very hungry, then you should eat the carbohydrate laden food first, or you should eat a bunch of macronutrients combined. So that would be like the hamburger or the sandwich, the bread, whatever's in that sandwich altogether.

Usually that's protein and vegetables as well. If you want to have a kind of more modest increase in glucose, you want to blunt the increase in glucose, then have the, at least some of the fibrous thing first, and then the protein and then the other thing. And then the protein and then the carbohydrate. You will notice that your blood glucose will rise more steadily and that you'll achieve satiety earlier in the meal.

Or at least you won't get this in huge peak. It's sort of the Thanksgiving meal effect. Some of you are international. So if you don't celebrate Thanksgiving as a time of year where it used to be the one time a year or two times a year where Americans would give themselves permission to eat enormous meals.

Now that seems to happen a lot more often. But there is this effect of you're full and yet you're hungry for more. That's because your blood glucose has gone through the roof and it's triggered a number of other mechanisms. There's also usually a lot of alcohol consumption.

And alcohol itself, because it's a sugar, will increase blood glucose very, very sharply. It depends on the alcohol. Some alcohols have more sugar than others. But basically what you're trying to avoid are steep increases in blood sugar.

And the order that you eat foods has an enormous impact on that. The other thing that has an enormous impact on how long and shallow or how steep that curve of glucose is depends on whether or not you recently were moving or start moving after you eat. So it turns out that your blood glucose levels can be modulated very, very powerfully by movement. If you did any kind of intense exercise or even just walking or jogging or cycling, anything before you eat your blood glucose levels will be dampened somewhat.

And that has to do with the release of something called glutton or glutton. Other people call it glut for. These are things that are involved in shuttling glucose to particular cells in the body, namely toward muscle and glycogen stores and away from body fat stores. It has to do with sequestering of glucose from the blood.

The point is that if you're somebody who struggles with blood sugar regulation, in addition to getting your body weight in a healthy range and doing all the other sorts of things that you should be doing, the key thing is to try and get some movement, sometimes, circa meal. Very few people can actually eat and walk at the same time, although I do it all the time, not because I'm trying to regulate my blood sugar, but just because I tend to be busy, I eat and drive. Basically, if I'm not giving this podcast or sleeping, I'm eating. But except the early part of the day when I fast.

But the bottom line here is that if you, for instance, take a 30-minute walk after a meal, your blood glucose will be blunted in ways that are beneficial. If you have exercise in the recent hours before a meal, that can be beneficial. The order that you consume foods is beneficial. And there are a few things that you can consume that can also adjust blood glucose levels.

So let's talk about those. But I thought it was important to really tamp down that it's not just what you eat. We talked about that before, but also the order that you eat those things, believe it or not, whether or not you combine macronutrients, carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, and fiber spectrails. And whether or not you've moved recently, the higher intensity of the movement, the greater the glute glute for increase, and the more that the blood glucose will be blunted, and you'll shuttle more of that to glycogen and muscle stores.

And even just moving after a meal, even just a calm, easy walk, can really adjust the ways in which blood sugar regulated for the better. I don't want to persevorate on this processed foods, hidden sugars thing too much, but understanding now a little bit about how insulin and glucose work, you can probably imagine why hidden sugars are such an attractive thing from the standpoint of processed food manufacturers, because if they can put sugar in that you can't even taste, that sugar is going to amplify the amount of glucose that's going to increase the rate of glucose increase into your bloodstream, and it's going to promote more feeding. So in that case, you're really being tricked. It's not that you're actually reaching for the additional appetizer and your blood glucose is going up.

The food that you ate is actually increasing your appetite as you eat it. It's a positive feedback loop. So don't want to demonize those any more than I already have, but you should be aware that these things are happening at the level of your bloodstream and brain. The other thing I'd like to address for a moment is this notion of stable blood sugar versus labial blood sugar or unstable blood sugar.

Some people just have stable blood sugar. They can go long periods of time without eating and feel fine. Other people get really shaky, really jittery, and or when they do eat, they feel really keyed up. Sometimes they'll even sweat, sometimes their vision will go blurry, and some of that can actually be because they become hyperglycemic.

And those effects that you experience when you are hyperglycemic are the early warning signs of the kinds of things that damage neurons and leads to the really terrible stuff they talked about before, like peripheral neuropathy. It takes some time for those things to occur. Those neuropathy to occur. But whether or not your blood sugar is all over the place or whether or not stable can be impacted by a number of things.

One of those things is exercise. So these days, there's a lot of interest in what they call zone 2 cardio, which is that kind of steady state cardio where you can just nasal breathe, even at pretty high output, where you could maybe have a conversation, although I'm such a huge proponent of nasal breathing during exercise. Most forms of exercise, especially zone 2 cardio, that you probably shouldn't be talking while you're doing that cardio unless it's absolutely essential. But periods of zone 2 cardio that last anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour or sometimes more for your endurance athletes can create positive effects on blood sugar regulations such that you people can sit down and enjoy whatever it is, the hot fudge sundae or whatever the high sugar content food is.

And blood glucose management is so good. Your insulin sensitivity is so high, which is a good thing that you can manage that blood glucose to the point where it doesn't really make you shaky. It doesn't disrupt you. And to say nothing of the weight-related issues or the adipose fat gain, etc., that's a separate issue because people vary there.

But basically doing zone 2 cardio for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week makes your blood sugar really stable. And that's an attractive thing for a variety of reasons. On the flip side, high-intensity interval training or resistance training, aka weight training, are very good at stimulating the various molecules that promote repackaging of glycogen. So sprints, heavy weight lifting, circuit type weight lifting provided there's some reasonable degree of resistance.

Those are going to trigger all sorts of mechanisms that are going to encourage the body to shuttle glucose back into glycogen, the very into glycogen into muscle tissue, restock, deliver, etc. Depleting one's glycogen actually takes some time. If you do a couple sets of tricep extensions and some crunches, you're not depleting your glycogen. Glycogen depleting workouts are very high intensity.

Generally, they're less than an hour or so. But those are the sort that are going to lead to big increases in the kinds of enzymes and metabolic pathways that are going to repack glycogen and shuttle most things towards restorations. Not into adipose tissue, not into fat, but taking glucose and making it into fuels that you can access later for more of that high-intensity activity. And I should mention that one of the advantages of high-intensity interval training or weight lifting of various kinds is that it also causes long-standing increases in basal metabolic rate.

I don't want to go too far down this path because we're going to do an entire month on human performance and athletic performance. But it's not just the increases in muscle that increase metabolism because muscle burns more energy than other types of tissues, except your brain, which truly burns the most energy. And is the main reason why your basal metabolic rate is what it is? Well, high-intensity training could be sprints.

It could be high-intensity interval training of different kinds. It could be weight training. Also has an effect of increasing thermogenesis even long after you've completed the exercise. So there's a long tail.

There's a kind of post-exercise metabolic effect that's also beneficial. So it's not an either or. It's really that high-intensity interval training and resistance training and things of that sort are very good for one reason. And the Zone 2 cardio is very good for other reasons.

And now you can see why it's just a healthy thing, why most people should probably be doing exercise most days of the week, if not every day of the week. If your goal is to manage blood glucose and your goal is to manage some of the metabolic factors that control repackaging of glycogen and encouraging excess glucose to not get diverted into body fat stores. We haven't talked a lot about lipids today. That's because most of today's discussion is about hormones and insulin is the dominant hormone in terms of mobilizing and managing glucose in the body, at least for most people.

But fats are very important. And there's just a little anecdote about fats that I think will be useful in thinking about why you want to manage what they call the LDL or HDL ratios. This is deserving of an entire episode, perhaps even several episodes. But some of you may be familiar with LDLs and HDLs.

Some of you may not. The LDL is low-density lipoprotein. This is the one that you don't want it to be too high. Costello is dreaming.

He loves all forms of cholesterol. But that's just costello dreaming. So LDL is the ones that you want to keep low. You don't want those to go excessively high.

HDLs, the high-density lipoproteins are the ones that are the so-called healthy lipoproteins. That's all fine and good. But you might ask yourself, what are they doing? What is the actual role of these things?

And why would you want healthy levels of HDL and not too much LDL? Well, one of the reasons is that fats don't like water, right? They are hydrophobic. And yet you need to move fats in your bloodstream.

All tissues in your body need fats. They need cholesterol. So we talked about cholesterol as a precursor to the sex steroid hormones, estrogen and testosterone and other hormones as well. Well, HDL and LDL actually coat fats that to allow them to be transported through the bloodstream.

They do a number of other things as well. But HDL is a key component of the delivery system that brings those fats to deliver ovaries, testes and adrenals. In other words, having adequate levels of HDL is good because it allows fats to be delivered to the tissues that manufacture testosterone, estrogen, cortisol in healthy levels, and the liver. So this is why when LDLs are too high, what's happening is you're not getting fats to the correct tissues and you can get buildup of fats like fatty liver disease and some of these things can happen.

High sugar content can even lead to some of these fatty liver conditions that's starting to happen. So this is the first time in human history, perhaps, that we're aware of. Anyway, that we're starting to see liver conditions that normally were associated only with severe alcoholism starting to come from sugar content. So what does this mean?

This means keep your LDL and HDL ratios proper. You want those HDLs in order to deliver fatty molecules to the very tissues that use cholesterol in order to manufacture hormones. So how do you keep LDLs and HDLs and their proper ratios? Well, a lot of people don't realize this, but the debate about dietary cholesterol and its relationship to LDL and HDL ratios is a barbed wire debate.

I don't want to get into it right now. There are still a lot of open questions as to how much dietary cholesterol impacts LDL and HDL ratios. I don't want to get into that now. I'm not taking a stance either way.

But what is very clear is that having highly elevated glucose, consuming too much sugar or not managing glucose in your body through some of the mechanisms that we've been talking about up until now, can also negatively impact LDL ratios. So managing glucose goes way beyond just managing blood sugar and making sure that you don't lay down too much body fat, making sure your metabolism stays high, making sure you're not getting jittery at meals. It also has to do with making sure that you're creating enough of the molecules HDL and not too many of the molecules LDL that are going to disrupt the delivery of things to the organs of your body that allow you to make healthy levels of testosterone estrogen and so forth. If that wasn't clear, let me make this ultra simple.

You want healthy levels of HDL and you want low levels of LDL because if you have ovaries, it will allow the fats that need to get to the ovary to produce estrogen to get there. And if you have testes, it will allow the fats and cholesterol molecules that you need in order to manufacture testosterone to get to the testes as well in order to have proper adrenal function and proper liver function, you want HDL and LDL in healthy correct levels. So now we've talked a lot about behavioral tools and the underlying biological mechanisms that justify those tools in particular circumstances. Now I'd like to turn to supplements and prescription drugs that regulate the hormone systems, controlling feeding and satiety.

There are huge number of these. Some have more powerful effects than others. There are two that I want to describe because they've been getting a lot of attention recently. First of all, there's a prescription drug Metformin, which was developed as a treatment for diabetes and it works potently to reduce blood glucose.

It has dramatic effects in lowering blood glucose. Metformin involves changes to mitochondrial action in the liver. That's its main way of depleting or reducing blood glucose. And it does so through the so-called AMPK pathway and it increases insulin sensitivity overall.

Metformin is a powerful drug. In fact, I'm surprised that so many people have sought it out, given that most of the people that I'm aware of that sought it out are not diabetic. I think for diabetics, it seems to be a useful drug. For non-diabetics, it can also, of course, lower blood glucose.

It also has the potential to make people hypoglycemic, genuinely hypoglycemic. So you really need to approach Metformin with caution. I get a little concerned when I hear about people blasting Metformin simply because fasted states or low blood sugar states are healthy. Doing that pharmacologically can have long-standing effects.

You really want to approach that with caution. Now, there's a comparable drug. It really should be called a drug, but it's non-prescription that's also in fairly prominent use out there called Berberine. B-E-R-B-E-R-I-N-E.

Berberine, correct. So, Berberine is a really interesting compound. It's actions very much mimic Metformin. So let's talk about Berberine for a second.

Berberine actually comes from various plants and tree bark. It is sold in supplement stores. It's sold online. As far as I know, unregulated.

It is powerful. If you're going to experiment with Berberine, you definitely want to talk to your doctor and you want to approach it with caution. It also works to activate the so-called AMPK pathway. AMPK, by the way, stands for Adenosine Monophosphate Activated Protein Kindness AMPK.

And it inhibits a protein tyrosine phosphate, one B pathway. I think that's enough nomenclature. It activates a certain pathway that's associated with fasting and low blood glucose. The effects of Berberine are, as far as I can tell, when looking at the literature, are very similar, if not identical to Metformin.

Now, the number of studies out there on this are many. So I'm just going to review a few of them and their major effects. As always, I invite you to check out examine.com. It's a wonderful website where you can put in any supplement or compound or biological goal for that matter.

And it will list out the various effects and the human effect matrix of studies on humans if they're available. And it will tell you whether or not there's strong effects or weak effects or modest effects. And it will point to the specific subject population, a wonderful resource. So Berberine, not surprisingly, has very strong effects in lowering blood glucose.

There are four studies on this. In fact, they say that Berberine is one of the more, if not the most effective supplements for lowering blood glucose. It talks about dosages there. Although, I'll just mention that I've tried Berberine and the dosages that are typical on the bottle.