How neonatologists' views on the Baby Doe regulations have changed over time. episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 29, 2022 · 14 MIN

How neonatologists' views on the Baby Doe regulations have changed over time.

from Springer Nature · host Springer Nature

The Baby Doe Regulations, which regulate the provision of life-sustaining treatment to seriously ill neonates, caused a stir amongst neonatologists when they were first enacted in the 1980s. The fear at the time was that they would restrict their ability to provide optimal care to seriously ill patients by mandating the use of aggressive treatments in all but futile cases, irrespective of a patient's quality of life. In this episode, we meet Early Career Investigator Katherine Guttman from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York. She tells us about her study which aimed to assess contemporary neonatologists' perceptions of the Baby Doe Regulations and to compare them to the views of neonatologists when they were first enacted. Read the full study here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-022-02105-9

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 29, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

How neonatologists' views on the Baby Doe regulations have changed over time.

0:00 14:23

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Springer Nature?

This episode is 14 minutes long.

When was this Springer Nature episode published?

This episode was published on September 29, 2022.

Can I download this Springer Nature episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!