How One Engineer Debugged a Year 2038 Bug in 2025 episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 17, 2026 · 9 MIN

How One Engineer Debugged a Year 2038 Bug in 2025

from The Software Engineering Podcast with Fexingo: Code, Architecture, and Engineering Best Practices · host Fexingo

In this episode, Lucas and Luna explore a real-world Y2038 bug that surfaced in 2025, years before the famous epoch overflow. They dissect how a legacy C++ trading system stored timestamps as 32-bit signed integers, causing a critical failure when a date field crossed the 2,147,483,647-second threshold. Lucas explains the root cause, the step-by-step debugging process using binary analysis, and the migration to 64-bit time_t. Luna questions whether the engineering team could have caught it earlier with better static analysis. The conversation covers signed vs unsigned integers, epoch time, and practical lessons for any developer working with date calculations in embedded or financial systems. A focused case study that shows why old bugs never really die. #SoftwareEngineering #Y2038 #Bug #C++ #LegacySystems #Debugging #EpochTime #TimeOverflow #BinaryAnalysis #StaticAnalysis #CodeReview #EmbeddedSystems #FinanceTech #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #Technology #EngineeringBestPractices #UnixTime Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 17, 2026

In this episode, Lucas and Luna explore a real-world Y2038 bug that surfaced in 2025, years before the famous epoch overflow. They dissect how a legacy C++ trading system stored timestamps as 32-bit signed integers, causing a critical failure when a date field crossed the 2,147,483,647-second threshold. Lucas explains the root cause, the step-by-step debugging process using binary analysis, and the migration to 64-bit time_t. Luna questions whether the engineering team could have caught it earlier with better static analysis. The conversation covers signed vs unsigned integers, epoch time, and practical lessons for any developer working with date calculations in embedded or financial systems. A focused case study that shows why old bugs never really die. #SoftwareEngineering #Y2038 #Bug #C++ #LegacySystems #Debugging #EpochTime #TimeOverflow #BinaryAnalysis #StaticAnalysis #CodeReview #EmbeddedSystems #FinanceTech #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #Technology #EngineeringBestPractices #UnixTime Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

PodParley-generated summary based on available episode metadata and transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

How One Engineer Debugged a Year 2038 Bug in 2025

0:00 9:40

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Software Engineering Podcast with Fexingo: Code, Architecture, and Engineering Best Practices?

This episode is 9 minutes long.

When was this The Software Engineering Podcast with Fexingo: Code, Architecture, and Engineering Best Practices episode published?

This episode was published on June 17, 2026.

What is this episode about?

In this episode, Lucas and Luna explore a real-world Y2038 bug that surfaced in 2025, years before the famous epoch overflow. They dissect how a legacy C++ trading system stored timestamps as 32-bit signed integers, causing a critical failure when a...

Can I download this The Software Engineering Podcast with Fexingo: Code, Architecture, and Engineering Best Practices episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!