How to use Gemini, ChatGPT, and other LLMs to find a job

On this week's episode of the From Dorms to Desks Podcast, our cohosts dive into a topic that barely existed a few years ago: how artificial intelligence tools like Gemini and ChatGPT are ushering in a new economic era, transforming the path from college to the workforce. This shift is already visible across sectors from technology and finance to media and law. For the first time, unemployment among recent graduates has exceeded the overall jobless rate, with some experts pointing to AI’s impact on entry-level roles, which appear more vulnerable than senior positions. Compounding the challenge are lingering pandemic effects, which limited networking opportunities and slowed the development of critical social skills. AI tools can be invaluable throughout the job search. They can help craft resumes and cover letters, suggest keywords, improve formatting, and generate tailored versions for specific roles. They support interview prep by creating practice questions, offering response guidance, and surfacing insights on company culture. Career exploration becomes more accessible as AI suggests paths aligned with a candidate’s skills and values, provides salary and job outlook data, and interprets complex postings. Some platforms even streamline applications by auto-applying at scale. Still, effectiveness depends on responsible use. Recruiters are quick to spot AI-generated language, making over-reliance counterproductive. AI should serve as inspiration and refinement, not a one-stop solution. Users must also protect their data by never sharing personal information on these platforms. Career services teams are actively grappling with ethical implications, student privacy concerns, and the breakneck pace of AI development. As AI automates more technical tasks, soft skills rise in importance. Experts emphasize problem solving, communication, curiosity, compassion, creativity, and courage. Hiring is shifting away from academic pedigree toward interpersonal and cognitive strengths. Graduates are urged to deliberately cultivate these skills—practicing public speaking, participating in group discussions, and showcasing social ability directly on resumes. Recruiters still prize human connection. To thrive in this evolving market, graduates should become fluent in AI by experimenting, comparing outputs, and rigorously fact-checking content. Beyond tools, they must evaluate employers carefully, seeking companies that invest in employees and use AI responsibly rather than purely for replacement. Asking about career progression, learning opportunities, and workforce development during interviews can reveal a company’s true priorities. Universities are adapting in real time, with career services forming working groups and creating toolkits to guide students toward ethical, effective AI use. The message is clear: AI is reshaping the entry into work, but those who pair fluency in new tools with strong human skills will remain competitive and in demand.