How you, as a peer reviewer, can contribute to a better process

Part of a short series addressing the issue of long review times, this track focuses on the role of the peer reviewer in the time it takes from submission to decision. Others in this series include "The frustrations of peer review: Why is it taking so long?" and "The role of journal editors in long review times". I returned to the issues raised in "Making Decisions: Peer Review" and "Why peer review is worth saving".Read the post here: https://jovanevery.co.uk/peer-reviewer-can-contribute-better-process/For more content like this, sign up to the monthly newsletter: jovanevery.co.uk/newsletterFollow me on Twitter: twitter.com/JoVanEveryFind my Facebook Page here: facebook.com/JoVEAcademicCareerCoach Join the Academic Writing Studio: academicwritingstudio.co.ukFor more advice, support and perspectives like this, sign up to my free monthly newsletter: https://jovanevery.co.uk/newsletter To find out how short chunks of time can revolutionise your writing, take the FREE 15 Minute Writing Challenge course: https://jovanevery.co.uk/15-min-writing-challenge/ Or join the Academic Writing Studio community: https://academicwritingstudio.co.uk  Support me on KoFi here: https://ko-fi.com/jovanevery  I'm no longer on Twitter, but I'm on Bluesky here: https://bsky.app/profile/jovanevery.bsky.social Find me on Linked In here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jovanevery/  Or follow along on Facebook here: https://facebook.com/JoVEAcademicCareerCoach