I SPY SCI OP

I used to drive an 18 wheel, man. The world is getting crazier. People are acting more and more insane. The end of the world is tomorrow to tomorrow to tomorrow.

There's only one thing to do when the world is feeling hard. Listen to Bazon, go on, discuss this. We can do this through the lens of Bible prophecy. You are listening to the new crime used to work.

You're listening to Canary Cry Radio No New Stock. It's July 30th of 2021. And today, I spy-sigh-op. My name is Gons.

If this is the first time you're checking out Canary Cry News, just talk welcome. And make sure to go to canuricrynewstalk.com to get all your show notes and everything. Yeah, no basil today. Now, if you're listening for the first time, normally I have a co-host to handle all of the introductions and knowing all the things that you do to be nice to people.

Not happening today. Basil is stuck in a time loop. And so I'll be doing this solo today. We'll see how it goes.

But welcome to the podcast, Canary Cry News Talk, where we bring you the best news, which is the gospel message of Jesus Christ, while reporting the egregious with a well-rounded, biblically grounded take on world events. And as you see over there, Basil is just a googly eye with Cowboy Hat just hanging out. He's here virtually, or maybe in spirit, but not in person. I do have the robot version of Basil.

Are you feeling over there? Gotta get that hype, bro. All right, good stuff. Hope everything is all right over there.

Yeah. OK, well, I'm sure he'll chime in every once in a while when we discuss certain stories and cover certain things. But I do want to start off by letting everybody know that the Face Like, the Sun YouTube channel, which I've been running since 2011, was not only deleted this last couple of days ago, but they rejected the appeal as well. So that means it's literally gone.

I don't have any access to it. It's pretty much done for. I tried to appeal. And the reason why I bring that up is because about a month ago, the Face Like The Sun channel was deleted.

And I was surprised to see that the, oh, I just realized that certain things were not updated in the show notes or the description section of some of the stuff. Great. But sorry, getting back to the stuff here. So yes, I tried to appeal it.

And then again, about a month ago, same thing. I hit my third strike and they deleted the channel, and I tried to appeal. And they actually accepted it to my surprise, the everyone's surprise, really. But this time they did not accept it.

They sent me this email. Thank you for your account suspension appeal. We have decided to keep your account suspended based on our community guidelines in terms of service. I don't know.

They won't explain to me exactly what the violations were. They just say, oh, you violated community guidelines, medical misinformation, no specifics, which is fairly typical of the way YouTube works nowadays. So not surprising whatsoever. But it is something that was expected.

I knew this was going to happen. Everybody kind of knew it was going to happen. It's just a matter of time. But alas, they have done it.

And they was a good run. 10 years, 44 million views, 266,000 subscribers. They had capped the subs on the channel. It didn't grow for two years.

It was stuck at 260,000 subscribers. And I don't have the access thing of the analytics now. But when I was able to, you can see that there were periods of time when they would purposefully just drop subscriptions by the hundreds, sometimes by the thousands, to keep it capped. And so to make sure it didn't grow any more than it did.

So it is what it is. We live in this world right now where YouTube is acting like a totalitarian dictatorship, an authoritarian news front to control the information that gets out there. And what are you going to do? So in the meantime, we have our Canary Cry News Talkback up channel and all the videos.

If you do want to search out the videos that I had published in the last 10 years, you can go to baselikethesun.info, which will give you a link tree to all the different links where I've connected my stuff to, including BitChute and this audience. Oh, I'm this. I say this. But the Odyssey channel, Rumble, I don't think Rumble has the archive.

Odyssey and BitChute has the archive. So you can go there. And all the links are there at facelikethesun.info. Or if you want to go to facelikethesun.live, it'll take you straight to BitChute, which I have to update the last couple news talk episodes there.

But I can keep up with all the administrative work that needs to be done to keep up with the different platforms. But hopefully you guys can use those tools that are out there to at least keep the message alive and the information that was compiled over the last 10 years alive, share it with friends and family and whatnot. OK, so let's see. Yes, Basil's second time loop.

For those of you watching, his Googly eyes are still here and they're looking at you. So just keep in mind that he's around. He's just not present. And give me a moment here.

This is the problem with doing this solo nowadays is Basil talks half the time. So when I run solo, I have to make sure that I can do some of the administrative work that needs to be done at the same time as I'm talking. So that includes things like moving the little chat box thing here so that people can see what's going on and all that kind of fun stuff. All right, so let's get into it.

I'm going to try to keep things a little shorter today because I'm doing it solo and I don't want to ramble for too long. But I'm going to start off with this clip from the Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. He was asked about what transitory inflation meant. And here's what he said, although I'm just going to play the full two minutes because it just speaks for itself.

Now, I know people watching are going to see the video and wonder why Jerome Powell's head looks like an alien and his ears look like elf ears. I think part of it is because whoever was filming this, they got it off of a computer screen and they're using their phone. And so the certain angles where they were holding the camera up up against the screen makes it look like he's some kind of alien elf creature. So, you know, I get it.

I get, he looks weird. But what's even weirder is him trying to explain transitory inflation. Except transitory is really this. It is that the increases will happen.

We're not saying they will reverse. That's not what transitory means. It means that the increases in prices will happen. So there will be inflation, but that the process of inflation will stop.

So that there won't be further. But when we think of inflation, we really think of inflation going up year upon year upon year upon year. That's inflation. When you have inflation for 12 months or whatever it might be, I'm just taking an example and not making an estimate, then you have a price increase.

But you don't have an inflation process. And so part of that just is that if it doesn't affect longer-term inflation expectations, then it's very likely not to affect the process of inflation going forward. So what I mean by transitory is just... Did you notice that he said, in fact, instead of what was he trying to say?

The process to affect, to effect. He was trying to say, effect, but he said, in fact. What's on your mind, alien power? The process of inflation going forward.

So what I mean by transitory is just something that doesn't leave a permanent mark on the inflation process. Again, we don't mean, I don't mean that producers are going to take those price increases back. That's not the idea. It's just that they won't go on indefinitely.

So to the extent people are implementing price increases because raw materials are going up or labor cross or something's going up, the question really for inflation really is, does that mean they're going to go up the next year by the same amount? So you're going to be in a process where inflation, inflation process gets going and that happens because people's expectations about future inflation move up. And we don't think that's happening. There's no evidence that it's happening.

All the evidence is that it's not happening. But nonetheless, we have to watch this very carefully because this is, we have two mandates maximum of climate and price stability. Price stability for us means inflation averaging 2% over time. And so we've got to be very careful about that.

But I think it's a good point that it's a term what it really means is temporary. But then you got to understand that it doesn't mean that the increases will be taken back. Some of them will be, but that's not really what it means. OK, so inflation is going to happen or is happening, but it's not happening.

But also the prices aren't going to ever go down. But I mean, if there's anybody who's out there, who especially the younger people, because you're not going to get financial education in public schools or even private schools, I don't think they really do financial education. I certainly didn't get any. And really for me personally, it wasn't until I started looking into Bitcoin that I really started to grasp like, OK, what is going on with the Federal Reserve and the fiat currency system?

And I knew about the issues before. And I was kind of a gold bug before. And I had read or tried to read through all of the creature from Jekyll Island by Edward G. Griffin.

And I understood that the financial system was fraudulent. And the debt-based system was a form of enslavement of the population. But now it's even more obvious. And with the Fed chair coming out and saying stuff like this, who is he trying to fool?

Honestly, I think your objective audience, your common citizen, especially American citizen, listens to that and says, Jerome Powell, you are full of it. I mean, you're not even making any sense. It doesn't make any sense what you're saying. So the Fed and everybody else, they continue to say that, oh, inflation is up a little bit, but it's not permanent, but it's not going down.

And so what you're saying is the prices of things aren't going to go back down to normal. It's up to where it is now, but it's not inflation. OK, whatever. And I think it's important, especially for young people, to understand that the way the US monetary system works is a problem.

This is the M1 Money Supply chart. I think they stopped recording some of this in certain ways recently. But it shows a chart for those of you just listening. You see a steady growth of the money supply, the dollar, billions of dollars from the chart anyway shows from about 2014.

It's a steady climb. They're talking about 2% inflation. That's sort of the way they've described it. And then after the 2020, March 2020, crash, the money supply just spikes.

It goes straight up. And what happens is that the purchasing power of your dollar goes down. So I had to have a family member who bought home in California a few years ago. And they're talking about, oh, you know, price has gone up.

And we've made a six-figure increase in the price of our home. And they're all excited about it. Great. But you know what that means?

It means that your dollar is just worth less than it was. You're purchasing less. Or you're purchasing powers less than it was. And that's a historical trend as well.

I have another chart here that shows purchasing power of the US dollar. This one ends in 2013. It's from 1913 when the Federal Reserve was created to 2013. And so in 1913, you have $1 as $1.

OK, so based on the purchasing power of the dollar in 1913, in 2013, the purchasing power of $1 was $0.5, which means it lost 95% of its purchasing power. That is the problem here. That is a big time issue. Now, there are ways to hedge against this.

Real estate is one way. And that's why the real estate market has gone up. They're hiding a lot of the inflation in real estate. And of course, that's why we have people complaining about companies like BlackRock buying up a whole bunch of properties.

And really what you want to do, and this is not financial advice, this is just age-old wisdom when it comes to the people that expose the financial fraud or the fiat fraud. They all suggest to diversify and get into assets that will appreciate in time and preserve. And that's gold and silver, land, real estate, I guess, falls under that category. And now, as a new commodity, things like Bitcoin or at least cryptocurrencies.

But of course, you know, can't get away with that too easily. So in the latest infrastructure bill, market insider, crypto firms will report transactions over $10,000 to the IRS under proposed tax push to help fund the US infrastructure plan. I think in the last couple of days, the infrastructure plan passed as a bipartisan thing. You know, both Republicans and the Democrats came.

They agreed. It's like a $550 billion infrastructure plan. And I think they said about $28 billion of that. Here we go.

The tightening regulations could bring in as much as $28 billion to offset parts of the $500 billion infrastructure. And how are they going to do that? They're going to tax crypto holders. And you know, this was kind of inevitable in some regard, but you know, it's kind of crazy.

So anytime you move crypto, if you're moving it through the institutional side of crypto holders and stuff or these crypto firms, then you're going to pay a little extra to Uncle Sam. And that's just another way to extract money out of the cryptocurrency system, which many people are using or have moved into as part of the narrative that, hey, the fiat system is broken. Let's figure out a way to protect our wealth and our hard-earned money. And of course, the Fed is like, no, we're going to figure out a way to tax that and get some money for infrastructure, for new buildings and new, you know, 5G towers and new, you know, AI driven things and all that.

So I don't know, folks, you know, it's one of those issues where no matter what you do, they're going to come after you in one way or another. And it's just inevitable. It's just the way the system works. And for those of you who like the US dollar and suggest that we need to stay in the US dollar, good luck to you too.

You have the digital yuan in China and you have all these different currencies. I think cryptocurrencies in general will start to move mainstream even more. But I think the big adoption phase will come when the CBDCs, the central bank digital currencies, especially a digital, like a central bank digital dollar gets released. That's when a whole bunch of people are going to be like, okay, so the government can just, send me money, digital dollars in my wallet, just as easily as they can take it away.

You know, for example, if you are unvaccinated, oh, you're an unvaxxed citizen. Oh, then you don't, you pay more taxes or you pay a fee or whatever, they just take it straight out of your wallet. And there's going to be a fork in the road eventually, you know, less the Lord returns and shuts everything down. But up until that point, and what we're projecting here is that kind of future where companies, businesses, individuals, they're just going to have to decide whether they're going to abide by the system or if they're going to try to, use tools like Bitcoin, the Bitcoins are not some kind of savior thing, it's a tool.

And it's a sound money in terms of, especially when you look at the digital infrastructure, the, you know, computing era, it is a much more sound money than fiat is. And you'll learn that if you go down that rabbit trail. But anyway, I just wanted to mention that because it's, it's one of those things where, again, if you're a young person, they just don't really teach you much about it. And I think it's important to start learning a little bit about it, especially if you're going to be into cryptocurrencies or gold or silver.

Why? Why do that? And there are good reasons and there are good ways to protect your money and your wealth and everything else. So again, not financial advice.

I'm just relaying some of the things I've learned and being someone that didn't have any financial education, didn't know how Wall Street worked for most of my life, still kind of confused about all the details and intricacies, but also learned a lot from the concept of decentralization and what the technology behind Bitcoin did to expose that infrastructure. And maybe that's part of the plan to, maybe that's part of the way in which similar to the internet and how at a certain point the central intelligence agencies were like, hey, well, we kind of have to open it up to the public if we want to really take advantage of the power of the internet. We've got to make it available to everybody and maybe that's a similar thing happening here, which I wouldn't be surprised if it was. But again, do your own research, come to your own conclusions.

And I encourage that. I encourage educating yourselves at this point. The schools are not going to teach you. Just as a side note too, before we get into a Flippy Update, I saw this right before I went live, so I thought I'd mention it.

The website is www.un.co.uk. Look up next week, Saturn will reach its closest point to Earth on Monday, making the ring to planet visible in the night sky. So Saturn will be visible to naked eye as it reaches closest point to Earth on Monday. Earth to move almost directly between Saturn and the Sun in annual opposition for UK Skywatchers.

The planet will first appear low on the horizon to southeast. It will then move up until 1 p.m. BST when it is as bright as it will ever be. You think there aren't some occultists in our world that are getting rituals prepared for this?

I would look out for some pretty intense stuff to happen next week in the world in general and just because of the timing of everything. This is a great opportunity for the occultists to pull off certain things here. So just that I'd mention that. Let's get into the Flippy Update.

Flippy Update. Do you want to rise without? Now if you're new to this show, this is Basil's Beat. We talk about Flippy in the Flippy Update segment.

The name Flippy as a colloquial name for the disembodied robot arms that are taking our jobs and slaving our children and flirting with our spouses. And today, the story comes from Forbes.com. Fantastic Voyage inspired miniature surgical robot aims to revolutionize abdominal surgery. Okay, all right, kinda creepy.

What's the little headliner here, the mini headline? Bill Gates backed vicarious surgical, which is set to go public in a spec deal, hopes to reach $1 billion in revenue by 2027 as it takes on the goliath of surgical robots. Oh, of course, a Bill Gates-backed surgical company called Vicarious Surgical, being compared to the frail David that went up against Goliath. Oh, that is just, that's ridiculous.

All right, let's see what it says. As a kid, Adam Saxco, founder and CEO of Vicarious Surgical, watched the 1966 science fiction movie Fantastic Voyage and was enamored of the premise of microscopic surgeons who performed surgery inside a scientist's brain. Quote, humans are the wrong size to operate on humans, he says. Quote, we're not going to shrink humans down, but we can create avatars of them.

We can create little miniature robotic versions. Okay, by the way, I'm seeing Jacqueline J in the chat. Coolio, you must be the similar ages of me. I remember Fantastic Voyage, the Coolio song.

The Coolio was a rapper. Lot of rapper references today, episode 369 too, if you're familiar with Lil John, made a song that had 369, Milleric. But this reminded me also, there was a movie, what was it? I think it had like, it was it Daniel Quaid, somebody famous, well, I guess all movie people are famous, but there's a movie where they shrink down and they go in.

Is that Fantastic Voyage? Hold on, let me just check here. Fantastic Voyage movie. Oh no, that's not it.

Okay, hold on. There was a movie back in the 80s, I think, where there is a guy who goes into this like shrunken little machine and goes into the body, inner space. Is that it? Inner space.

Oh, that's it? Yes. 1987, there you go. Dennis Quaid, Martin Short, yes, that's the one.

Yeah, I saw that a lot. I remember watching that on TV, I was a kid. But Fantastic Voyage, 1966, the description here from IMDb Scientist, Jan Beens, who knows the secrets of keeping soldiers shrunken for an indefinite period, escapes from behind the Iron Curtain with the help of CIA agent, Stephen Boyd, or Stephen Boyd. While being transferred, their motorcade is attacked, yada yada yada.

So great, it's a positive CIA message there in that movie. I continue on with the story here. That's just what he and his vicarious surgical co-founders, Sami Khalifa, the company's chief technology officer, and Dr. Barry Green, its chief medical officer, have spent the past decade doing.

They have developed an 80-bitty robot paired with a VR headset for abdominal surgeries that they hope to bring to market in 2023. It's two arms and camera. Two arms and camera are designed to enter the patient's belly through an incision of less than an inch and operate in all directions once there. Shrinking a surgical robot down is exceptionally difficult.

But by doing so, the vicarious trio hopes to help doctors perform abdominal surgery, starting with hernia operations faster, safer, and with fewer complications than existing alternatives. It's not exactly the sci-fi stuff of the movie in which doctors are injected into the patient's bloodstream. But it's futuristic enough that vicarious has attracted A-list investors, including Bill Gates, Vinod Kolsla, Eric Schmidt, former head of Google, and Jerry Yang. It has also received a breakthrough designation from the FDA, the first for a surgical robot to making it eligible for priority review.

So, there you go. I mean, I guess this isn't flippy proper because with Flippy, we normally talk about the autonomous robots and AI. This is controlled via humans with VR headsets, but I don't know, it's just one step away from the AI learning enough, getting enough data to be able to operate on its own. And this seems kind of creepy looking, I don't know.

It's kind of alien style to reverse alien to let this thing into your belly. For those of you listening, it's got these two little eye-looking things as lights and then these two arms that come out with little pinchers and I mean, it's not really the nicest looking thing. But there you go. And I think that's what will be jealous that you missed this one, that missed this flippy update.

But there you go. This is a fantastic for Agent Surgical Robot, aims to revolutionize abdominal surgery funded by none other than Bill Gates. And actually tweeted, by the way, I'm out of Twitter jail this morning. So yay, but I did tweet out that, what did I say?

Speaking of Bill Gates, I said, he has billions of dollars, owns tons of farmland, wants you to stop eating meat, and also drink his own personal purified urine. He wants you to take a jab, block the sun, and now vicariously become a robot armed to perform abdominal surgeries. And you know, that's kind of crazy too. To call it vicarious, surgical or surgery, or whatever it's called, I don't know, the whole idea of vicariously wanting to do it.

Weird, creepy, all those words to describe this type of thing. And yes, again, for those of you watching or listening, Basil is out today, but you can be hypnotized by his time warped eyeballs or googly eyes that are opening and closing pupils, getting smaller and dilating. I don't know, he's tripping out, so we're just gonna move on. Here, Basil, anything to say about that?

Interesting. Oh, okay, great, fantastic, thanks. Yeah. All right, we have a couple 33 updates.

33 is the number of completion of the great work. And before I get into the 33 updates, I didn't want to briefly do kind of an overview of what the 33 represents or what it entails. And you know, because we've done explanations of it before, but I think it's good to explain it every once in a while, just for new listeners, if they don't know, because we did get a comment, gosh, two weeks ago, maybe a week ago somebody was like, don't listen to these guys, they're Freemasons. And the logic was, you guys found 33, signal to the elite.

And I was like, oh, well, I guess the joke went over your head a little bit there. Because we're not promoting the number 33, but we are exposing the concept of 33 and what it is. And you know, it's interesting because there's a negative connotation of the number 33 in the Bible compared to the occult and the esoteric philosophies, which have a positive view of the number 33. And for example, Manly P.

Hall in his book, Secret Teachings of All Ages said this quote, "'Alchemy is a threefold art. It's mystery well symbolized by a triangle. Its symbol is three times three elements or processes in three worlds or spheres, the three times three is part of the mystery of the 33rd degree of Freemasonry. For 33 is three times three, which is nine, the number of esoteric man and the number of emanations from the root of the divine tree.

It is the number of worlds nourished by the four rivers that pour out of the divine mouth as the verbum fiat. Beneath the so-called symbolism of alchemy is concealed a magnificent concept for this ridiculed and despised craft still preserves intact the triple key to the gates of eternal life, realizing therefore that alchemy is a mystery in three worlds. The divine, the human and the elemental, it can easily be appreciated why the sages and philosophers created and evolved an intricate allegory to conceal their wisdom." So there you go, the number 33 is a number that conceals the wisdom of the elite. But in the Bible, little different relationship to the number there in certain ways.

Revelation 12, then another sign appeared in heaven, a huge red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven royal crowns on his head. His tail swept a third of the stars, 33%, 33.33, 33, 33, 33, 33, 3%. From the sky tossing them to the earth. And during judgment, Revelation 8 talks about how during the first four trumpets, you have a third of the earth burning up, a third of the trees and a third of the grass burning up, a third of the sea turning to blood, a third of the living creatures in the sea dying.

Let's see, what else? A third of the rivers. Okay, what is this? And the great star burning like a torch fell from heaven and landed on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water, that's warm wood, by the way.

A third of the waters turned bitter and a third of the sun and moon and stars were also struck and a third of the stars were darkened, a third of the day was without light and a third of the night as well. So there you go. There's obviously an element of judgment when it comes to 33 or at least a third, 33.33, 33%. When it comes to that.

So keeping that in mind, we track this 33 number because it seems to be used quite a bit by the elite in articles and certain situations to signal certain things is all we can really say. And the first article here, a lot of people shared this with me, npr.org, Gunmaker offers Sandy Hook families 33 million dollars. Here's what they may be considering. And we don't have to read the whole story here.

After years, a years long legal battle with the maker of the rifle used in the Sandy Hook Elementary School, some of the victims' families are deliberating over a 33 million dollar settlement offer from Remington Arms. The offer presented by the now bankrupt gun makers in court documents on Tuesday comes just a day after a judge denied the company's request to dismiss the lawsuit. However, the sum falls short of what families have previously said, they expected. Court documents earlier this year, they argued that wrongful death settlements could reach 225 million and expected total punitive claims could exceed 1 billion dollars.

1 billion dollars. Ah, go ahead, just print that. Print that, make that money printer go burr. So interesting, it's almost like the gun makers here, Remington Arms is signaling to the elite.

Like, oh, this is all we have left for bankrupt, but here's 33 million. Please just let us off the hook, the Sandy Hook. Yeah, okay. All right, well, interesting.

Interesting numbers always. I'm sure they did that to perhaps, again, appeal to certain tiers of society to try to get off here. But the other one is also very interesting. I think this other one, another story is a little more interesting.

This is Union County Daily Digital and the headline, FCC approves wireless licenses for 33 smart mobility quarter slash beta district. But this is very interesting. The 33 smart mobility quarters connected vehicle environment is taking another step forward with approval from the Federal Communications Commission, the FCC approved the license for short range wireless vehicle to infrastructure, V2I, technology installed along the quarter, which can now be used for connected and automated vehicle testing and research. The license allows 33 smart mobility projects, including connected Dublin, connected Marisville, drive Ohio initiatives, and names a few other companies here.

The Northwest 33 Council of Governments, the Northwest 33 Council of Governments, the NW 33COG, oversees the district and the 33 smart mobility quarter project. The COG received $5.9 million, received a $5.9 million US Department of Transportation Grant to test connected vehicles and roadside infrastructure and share lessons learned with policymakers and the global transportation industry. So I think they don't mention it here, but this has to be 5G, because they're talking about short range and most of 5G operates on these short wave Wi-Fi systems or wireless systems. And instead of like one giant tower doing everything, we've seen all the little pods that have to be set up in certain distances from each other to relay the signals and to keep connectivity strong.

So I think that's what this is, but very interesting that there is a 33 smart mobility project and it's overseen by the Northwest 33 Council of Governments. I don't know, it doesn't get much more blatant than that if you ask me, but what do I know? I'm just a podcaster. So all right, moving on here.

We're gonna get into some blockchain stuff. Folks you. Folks you. Folks you.

Folks you. And first up here, we are going to play this Fauci montage. This was going around and it's worth sharing. It is Dr.

Anthony Fauci's flip flop of everything from masks to social distancing to even the vaccine in some regard. But it's interesting to see the side by side and the flip flop of Fauci over the last year here. People should not be walking around with masks. Let me just state for the record that masks are not theater.

Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. And masks are protective. It's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. It has not been any.

I need that mute button. I need to get that in. Sorry, positive on creepy Zuckerberg face there. All right, let's move back a little bit.

Not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. It has not been any indication that putting a mask on and wearing a mask for a considerable period of time has any deleterious effects. There are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.

Then can you get some sort of thing inside their horse? You do not need to wear a mask indoors if in fact you've been vaccinated. Good that you're vaccinated, but in a situation where you have people indoors, particularly crowded, you should wear a mask. So even if you are vaccinated, you should wear a mask.

If in fact you are vaccinated, fully vaccinated, you are protected and you do not need to wear a mask. Outdoors are indoors. When the children go out into the community, you want them to continue to wear masks. You know, if you look at children outside, particularly when they're with the family, walking down the street playing a game or whatever, don't have to wear a mask.

The pediatric, the academy pediatric actually makes that recommendation that children should be wearing masks from two years old onward. And you're asking now, if your child is a member of your household, can you walk outdoors with your child without a mask? According to that shot, the answer is yes. But the child can't not to be defeated to death.

Yes, yes. Now the CDC says, I think I've got this right. One mask is better than zero masks. Two masks is better than one mask, but you don't have to have double masks.

Is that right? You know, it became clear that cloth coverings, that you didn't have to buy in a store, that you could make yourself adequate. And then you wanted to fit that in. So one of the ways you could do it, if you would like to, is put a cloth mask over, which actually here and here and here, where you can get leakage in, is much better contained.

Are you a double mask or Dr. Fauci? Look like you are. So there you go.

The flip-flop of Fauci. And there's a lot of people now. And I'm seeing this all over the internet here, in social media and everything, where even people who wouldn't be considered, you know, conspiracy theorist or fringe or whatever, those people are starting to come out and say, Hey, what's going on here? Well, why, the only people that are still defending the Fauci flip-ening, the flip-flop, are people that are really, really defending science.

And they're like, science evolves. But it's like, not to this degree, it doesn't evolve back and forth. And we've shown over the many episodes that we've done since last year when everything started to lock down. We showed the New England Journal of Medicine, directly saying that masks are a kind of, what was the word?

Not signaling, it was. And this was for nurses and medical practitioners. A talisman, it's not that they work for sure in keeping out or preventing spread of any kind of disease. It's just a talisman.

It makes people feel better, makes them feel protected. And that was the New England Journal of Medicine. And once some people pointed it out, they made a correction or a new statement regarding it, saying like, oh, we still recommend masks, but they didn't address the part where they said it's a talisman for medical practitioners. If it's a talisman for medical practitioners, what is it for the general public?

If not some kind of muzzle? I'm just asking questions. Let's see, what else here regarding Fauci? Oh, here's what I think.

Fauci should listen to his own advice. You do not know what you were talking about. Oh, it feels weird to laugh by myself. I watch this or do this.

What am I doing? Watching, doing. Okay, so let's move on here. What else do I have?

Oh, this is Biden. I have a clip here of Biden. He was asked about mandatory vaccinations. And here's what he said.

Well, I'd like to see them continue to move in that direction. And that's why I pointed out I had asked the Justice Department to determine whether that is they're able to do that legally. And they can. Local communities can do that.

And local businesses can do that. It's still a question whether the federal government can mandate the whole country. I don't know that yet. Hmm.

Huh. He doesn't know for sure if the federal government can mandate vaccines illegally or not. This is not good, folks. Direction, this is moving.

It's not good. And actually, there's a reason.com article that I linked in the show notes in the, what's the section call? I always forget additional story section, but I'll mention it here. Biden asks DOJ for opinion about federal vaccine mandate.

And this author here, Josh, Josh Blackman, responded. He had a few, few immediate reactions. He said, quote, first there is there sufficient statutory authority to impose such a mandate? Of course, Congress could enact a new statute, but Congress doesn't actually legislate anymore.

And says it's more likely that the president relies on some extent of 40 like the CDC. And this is part of the problem with all of this. This entire year, this has been the issue, that these unelected officials, medical officials, CDC, WHO, are just stepping in and saying things. And everybody is just abiding.

Nobody's asking questions, nobody's pushing back. And I think that's more of the issue here. Beyond just, hey, the science is this idea that these unelected officials are dictating what happens worldwide. And yes, there are local businesses, local health officials that can definitely influence the way their local communities respond, but I don't know.

It doesn't, I don't think the federal government needs to mandate anything because it's already sort of implied based on the chain of command from these world institutions through the federal government, maybe not legally, but socially they're definitely pressuring everybody. And then everybody falls in line. Second, Jacobson versus Massachusetts does not fully resolve the issue. The case concerned at the state's general police power, the federal government lacks a generalized police power.

Rather, it has enumerated powers. What enumerated power would give the executive branch the ability to forcibly jab millions of Americans with a needle, perhaps, in the absence of clear statutory authority? There is case law about a federal draft, though that authority is closely tied to the federal war power. You know, I thought we were done arguing about mandates with California versus Texas, alas, we are stuck in a loop.

Okay, third DOJ should be careful how it defines mandate. And Jacobson, there was no forcible mandate to be vaccinated. People could instead choose to pay a $5 fine or get jabbed, roughly $150 in present day value. I told you guys inflation, the $5 fine back then is equivalent to $150 fine today.

But you know what, there's a part of me that's like, hey, you will need us to pay $150 to maintain our physical, not our immunity, what's the word I'm looking for? Freedom, I guess. The freedom of our autonomy, that's the word, our physical autonomy, then sure, $150 over who knows what kind of physical damage or generational damage that can be caused. You know, I'm okay with that to some degree.

Fourth, from a policy perspective, this idea strikes me as counterproductive. The worst way to encourage people to get a shot is to mandate it. People will resist and engage in civil disobedience. I think there is a good reason why most nations around the world have not imposed forcible mandates.

And I was thinking about it, I'm like, forcible mandates in many ways they have though. You know, again, they've, they haven't forced a jab directly, certain businesses have, you know, it's like, take it or be fired. But you still have that escape hatch. I can quit my job, you know, and I know it's not feasible for everybody, but there's that option.

And but they've done everything else socially, economically, and I think that'll get worse. Now, if OLC never publishes this opinion, we can presume the answer is quote, no, you cannot impose a nationwide vaccine mandate. I'm grateful Biden slipped here. So there you go.

I mean, you know, I'm not a legal expert in any regard, especially when it comes to these issues. But as far as I can understand, the federal government does not have the power to really, you know, federally mandate a vaccine for everybody in the country, let alone the world. So something to keep in mind here. But you know, they don't need, the federal government doesn't need to mandate and force everybody.

There's enough pressure coming from mainstream media. And that's where the first story, or I guess it's like the first official story under waxing comes from New York Times, CDC internal report calls Delta variant as contagious as chickenpox. So scary. See what they say here.

And by the way, this comes at the heels of last month. They were saying, oh yes, Delta variant is definitely more transmissible, but it's not as harsh. Now they're changing their tune on that mother flip-flop. It says the Delta variant is much more contagious, more likely to break through protections afforded by the vaccines and may cause more severe disease than all other known versions of the virus, according to an internal presentation circulated within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That is our source. An internal presentation circulated by the CDC. Okay. You know, touching back to the Bitcoin thing real quick.

And the reason why, that some of you on social media on Twitter last couple of days was saying that, or they were asking the question, why are so many Bitcoiners and Tvaxxers? And they're kind of appalled, because there's a lot of Bitcoiners out there that are like, and then the heck, no, not big in the jab. And why? Why are so many Bitcoiners and Tvaxxers, or labeled anti-vaxxers?

And here's why. There is a idiom when it comes to Bitcoin cryptocurrency. And that idiom is, don't trust verify. Okay, don't trust verify.

What that means is, don't trust a person, an institution, a government, you don't need to trust them, verify it. The transactions are on the blockchain and everyone can see it. So in a certain way, there is a public audit of any claims made. So let's say, I don't know, some big bank or something, JP Morgan, who just opened up crypto buying to the public.

JP Morgan says, hey, we bought $10 million worth of Bitcoin. Well, they can say that, and we can trust them saying that, but what's more important for the public is if they can verify it. And if they can see, oh, hey, look, the JP Morgan public Bitcoin wallet, a republic key, you can see that yes, they have purchased $10 million worth of Bitcoin. You can verify it as a public, okay?

So that's the saying. So don't trust verify. And along those sentiments, what's happening now? And then the reason why so many Bitcoiners are anti-vaxxers is because when it comes to the vaccine and the virus and the pandemic and everything else, it's the complete opposite.

It's don't, no need to verify, just trust us. It's what these guys are saying, CDC and Fauci's and the governments, they're all just saying, just trust us, don't need to verify. And in fact, don't even try to verify, you're gonna find yourselves in a rabbit hole of documents that are not peer reviewed and internal documents, the internal presentations that are not public, what was the Gupta, the Gupta in the last episode said on a CNN interview about the 99% or 97% whatever, of people dying of COVID or unvaccinated. He said that that data is based on unpublished data, or that info is based on unpublished data.

So yeah, don't verify anything we're saying here, just trust us. So again, that's the correlation there. But I continue. Dr.

Rachael P. Walensky, the director of doom, acknowledged on Tuesday that vaccinated people with so-called breakthrough infections of the Delta variant to carry just as much virus in the nose and throat as unvaccinated people, it may spread it just as readily if less often. Okay, that's weird. They shouldn't wanna say more often.

So they're like, oh, less often, but it could still happen. And by the way, if you go listen to the most recent no agenda show, it's kind of a supplement to our show. They were talking to Adam and John over there were talking about how the Delta variant, there are no tests or at least it's very obscure, the tests that are verifying the Delta variant. It's very limited.

The number of lab confirmed tests of the Delta variant. They're just making assumptions. Oh, one out of 100 tests were an example. I don't know, this isn't the actual thing.

But one out of 100 tests from this region was a Delta variant to therefore, this entire region must be covered in Delta variants. That's kind of the logic that they're using. Again, don't trust or do trust, don't verify. According to these leaders here, but the internal document lays out a broader and even grimmer view of the variant.

The Delta variant is more transmissible than the viruses that cause MERS, SARS, Ebola, the common cold, the seasonal flu and smallpox. And it is as contagious as chickenpox, according to the document, a copy, which was obtained by the New York Times, you know, the New York Times authority, getting a copy of the unpublished internal documents. Again, trust us. The immediate next step for the agency is to quote, acknowledge the war has changed, the document said.

Its contents were first reported by the Washington Post on Thursday evening. The document's tone reflects alarm among CDC scientists about Delta's spread across the country, said a federal official who has seen the research described in the document. The agency is expected to publish additional data on the variant on Friday. Okay, so are we gonna see that?

Let me just check the CDC.gov website. Let's see if there's anything published on that. Delta variant, let me do a quick search. Delta about the virus, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Delta project from 2013 journals. Let's see if there's anything there. I'll break associated with gymnastics facility. Delta virus 2016 to 2019.

That's weird. I don't see anything in the immediate here, but I'm sure they'll share it at some point. There were 71,000 new cases per day on average in the US as of Thursday. The new data suggests that vaccinated people are spreading the virus and contributing to those numbers.

Although probably probably to a far lesser degree in the unvaccinated. Okay. You know, this is, I've been, not just me, me and Basil, other people that have been looking at this as objectively as possible. I've been ranting and raving about demonizing the unvaccinated, making the word or title unvaccinated synonymous with terrorist.

And it's because of this type of verbiage. Okay, I mean, while it's committed that you're just as likely to spread the virus, if you're vaccinated as those unvaccinated, then why are they, do they keep suggesting the new data suggests that vaccinated people are spreading the virus and contributing to the other, although probably, probably a far less degree than unvaccinated. I mean, come on, folks. I think we want this kind of like, I know I'm not the only one.

I think a lot of people are like, what is going on here? I think we know what's going on. Dr. Walensky has called transmission by vaccinated people are rare events, but other scientists have suggested.

It may be more common than one's thoughts. Oh, okay. All right. The agency's new masking guidelines for vaccinated people introduced on Tuesday were based on the information presented in the document.

Oh, this mysterious document that nobody has seen yet, except the New York Times and Washington Post, declaring all kinds of health measures across the country. The CDC recommends that vaccinated people wear masks indoors in public settings in communities with high transmission of the virus. But the internal documents hints that even the recommendation may not go far enough, quote, given higher transmissibility and current vaccine coverage, universal masking is essential. You know, it's never about the vaccine.

It was never about the virus. It was always about compliance. You know, it's always about how we can get everybody to comply and muzzle everybody. The agency's data suggests that people with weak immune systems should wear masks, even in places that do not have high transmission of the virus.

This is like the closest thing they've said to like, Hey, here's how you can strengthen your immune system. So should vaccinated Americans who are in contact with young children, older adults, or otherwise vulnerable people, there are roughly 35,000 symptomatic infections per week among those 162 million vaccinated Americans, according to data collected by the CDC as of July 24th, that was cited in the internal presentation. But the agency does not track all mild or asymptomatic infections. So the actual incidents may be higher.

Okay. There you go, folks. That they're kind of admitting that, okay, yeah, there's a certain amount of vaccinated people that are spreading the virus. But this internal presentation does not track mild or asymptomatic infections.

They can make the conjecture. You know, it's almost like they're conveniently leaving out certain variables so they can pump out the narrative that they want, you know, because if we're gonna bow down to science, why aren't we covering all the bases before they release it? Well, we know why infection with adults very and produces virus amounts in the airways that are 10 fold higher than what is seen in people infected with the alpha variant, which is also highly contagious, the document noted. The amount of virus in a person infected with delta is a thousand fold more than what is seen people infected with the original version of the virus, according to the recent study.

Oh my goodness. So if you're, even if you're vaccinated, if you get the virus, the delta variant, you're a thousand fold more, what is this? Virus in person infected is a delta, a thousand fold more than what is seen in people infected. Okay, so you have a thousand fold more virus?

Okay. At a certain point, this is just like complete, complete poop. This is just bull poop, that's all I can say. The CDC document relies on data from multiple studies, including the analysis of a recent outbreak in Provincetown, Massachusetts, which began after the townsforth of July festivities by Thursday, that cluster had grown to 882 cases, about 74% were vaccinated local health officials have said, okay, we're getting some numbers here and some sources of the study, one place that they mentioned so far.

Provincetown, Massachusetts, and 822 cases, less than a thousand cases to justify masking up and locking back down and all that kind of stuff. Detailed analysis of the spread of cases shown that showed that people infected with delta carry enormous amounts of virus in their nose and throat, regardless of vaccination status, according to the CDC document. Interesting how this story goes on, it goes from like, less likely, less likely to give it the vaccinated, carry enormous amounts of virus in their nose and throat. Oh.

We're all gonna die. Quote, this is one of the most impressive examples of citizen science I have seen, said, Celine Gounder, the infectious disease specialist at Bellevue Hospital in New York. The people involved in the Provincetown outbreak were meticulous in making lists of their contacts and exposures. Infection with the Delta variant may be more likely to lead to severe illness, the document noted.

Studies from Canada and Scotland found that people infected with the variants are more likely to be hospitalized while research in Singapore indicated that they are more likely to require oxygen. Still, the CDC's figures show that the vaccines are highly effective in preventing serious illness, hospitalization, death, and vaccinated people, I'd say. Okay. So you won't die and you may not go to the hospital, but still not to ask up because you have enormous thousand times more virus in you than the original strain.

Quote, overall Delta is the troubling variant. We already knew it was said John Moore, a virologist at Wheel Cornell Medicine in New York. Quote, the sky isn't falling and vaccination still protects strongly against the worst outcomes, of course. Make sure to keep getting your job folks, no matter what, even though you can still spread the virus.

This, I really hope people share this story with friends and family who are skeptical about your worldview. And you can say, look, anybody who says in the mainstream or politicians or whatever, that you are getting the vaccine so that you're protecting yourselves from your neighbors. It's the thing to do, remember Kamala Harris came out, oh, it's biblical because you love thy neighbor. You're protecting them by getting vaccinated.

All hogwash, according to their own little thing here about how much it can spread even if you're vaccinated. So it's all just nonsense. Makes me angry. All right.

So there's your New York Times article, CDC internal reports calls, Delta variant as contagious as chicken box. It's a mysterious internal document, sources, what is it, Massachusetts, Italian Massachusetts, a town in what was it Ireland? Or let me just verify that real quick. Let me scroll here, where'd it go?

Let's see, yes, the July 4th, da da da da da da. Canada and Scotland, that's what it was. Canada, Scotland and Singapore. That's it.

That's gonna determine all the rest of the world. Not considering any of the variables there. Okay, let me just briefly take this opportunity here to mention the reason why I call the episode, I spy, sigh, op, and I used, you know, instead of psychological operation, scientific or scientism operation, is because we are seeing very much this unfolding, this externalization of a scientific dictatorship. And so much of it is based on, not just the totalitarian mindset, but a lot of it has to do with population control, population reduction.

And there's a little segment from a book that was written by Paul and Philip Collins. They've kind of fallen out of favor with certain peers amongst the, you know, fringe Christian conspiracy minded folk or whatever you wanna call it. I first heard about this book from Derek and Sharon Gilbert's back in like 2009 or 2010 when they were interviewed on a view from the bunker or PID radio, I can't remember which one, but this is a while ago. And the book was published in 2005 or 2006.

And in the book, there's a section called Darwinism Dismantled. And I'm just gonna read a little bit here about some philosophical perspectives of those that are out there now, the CDCs, the Fauci's and the Bill Gates of the world. It says here, one of the major influences on Darwin was Thomas Malthus, an Anglican clergyman who had received the blessing of French deist Jean-Jacques Rousseau and radical empiricist David Hume. Malthus authored, essay on the principle of population, a treatise, premised upon the thesis, quote, population when unchecked increases in a geometrical ratio, subsistence increases only in an arithmetic ratio.

Although Malthus articulated his observation in succinct mathematical equations, the labyrinth and complex machinations comprised the natural order or comprising the natural order typically defies such overly simplistic reductionism. Nonetheless, nonetheless, Malthus concluded that society should adopt certain social policies to prevent the human population from growing disproportionately larger than the food supply. Malthus's genocidal policies specifically targeted the poor. For instance, one of his proposals suggested the implementation of the following measures, and this is from Malthus's book, quote, "'Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits.'" Put up on the street, anybody.

In our towns, we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. Sound familiar? In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools and particularly encourage settlement in all marshy and unwholesome situations. Really?

Seriously? But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases. Sound familiar? And those benevolent, but much mistaken men who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders.

And back to a polynomial at Collins here, through the promotion of hygienically unsound practices among impoverished populations, Malthus believed that the undesirable elements of the human herd could be naturally culled by various maladies. I think this is partially what's going on with the elderly and with the poor. I continue here. Yet amongst one of Malthus's most shocking proposals, oh, I skipped the sentence, the spread of disease could be further assisted through discriminative vaccination and zoning programs.

Again, people that have studied the history of eugenics sees what's happening now and they're very alarmed. They're like, hey, this is exactly what so many eugenists and population control people have publicly published over the last century or more. Why are we adhering to those philosophies with these policies? Yet amongst one of Malthus's most shocking proposals was a suggestion concerning children.

Quote, we are bound in justice and honor formally to disclaim the right of the poor to support to this end. I should propose a regulation be made declaring that no child born should be ever entitled to parish assistance. The illegitimate infant is comparatively speaking a little value to society, as others will immediately supply its places all children beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this desired level must necessarily perish unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons. This is pretty disturbing and sick if you ask me.

And we're talking about a very spiritually deprived conscience seared as with a hot iron to suggest that oh my gosh, to cull populations, let's kill the poor. Let's make sure that we keep remedies from diseases from the public, you know? What's happening is almost more sinister because they're like, hey, let's roll out a vaccine. It might kill even more of the older people and the vaccine doesn't do much other than to prevent you from severe illness, you can still spread it everywhere.

So I just wanted to quote that as a reference or worldview to understand what's rolling out, the spirit behind it, if you will. And I wanted to include some scripture in today's episode, especially I don't have basil to bounce off of today. So turning to the scriptures is always a good plan. I think we should do more of it actually in general.

But what kind of biblical stuff is in there to apply to a vaccine hesitant person or resistant type of person? I found a few. So here's Psalm 41, and maybe somebody has already covered this. But Psalm 41 verse three, the Lord will sustain him on his bed of illness and restore him from his bed of sickness, the Lord will, not vaccines.

You know, some people can argue maybe, you know, there's like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Those are tools, but ultimately the Lord will heal you, which many people have recovered from COVID-19. More people than have died. Another one from Psalms chapter 118 verse eight, it's better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man.

Very good, right? Fauci, should we trust you Fauci? Science is truth. Mm, okay.

All right, Fauci. But you know, it says here, it's better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust any man, right? You do not know what you are talking about. Okay, well, sorry Fauci.

Another one here from Mark chapter five, verses 24 through 29. So Jesus went with them in a large crowd, followed and pressed around him. And a woman was there who had suffered from bleeding for 12 years. She had born much agony under the care of many physicians and had spent all she had, but to no avail.

Instead, her condition had only grown worse. Imagine that this lady spent her life savings with many physicians to try to prevent or figure out what's going on, to no avail. It made it worse. Think maybe something like that is happening today, folks, with people that have some kind of ailment, spending a lot of money, a lot of time, with physicians, doctors.

And this is not anything against physicians and doctors. You know, I think a lot of them are trying to help people or are helping people, they do for the most part. But I think when it comes to compliance to the system, it's very easy for people that are doctors and stuff to just fall in mind. And there are definitely a many across the world who are seeing what's happening and are rebelling against it, and they're being silenced.

So, yes, this is not an indictment against physicians or anything like that, but in this case, it's kind of a good example. And I think this also speaks to the transhumanist agenda, how they're trying to solve everything through money and physicians and stuff like that. And not just physicians, but science in general. The experts, I continue on here verse 27.

A woman heard about Jesus. She came up through the crowd behind him and touched his cloak for she kept saying, if only I touch his garments, I will be healed immediately. Her bleeding stopped. And she sensed in her body that she was healed of her affliction.

And ultimately, it's just an important thing to point out here that Jesus is healing, and this can apply both to the literal in terms of the physical, but also spiritually in the eternal sense, there's only one true healer. And it's not Dr. Fauci, it's not a vaccine. Okay, moving on.

First Corinthians three, verses 16. Do you not know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's spirit dwells in you? If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him. For God's temple is holy and you are that temple.

I know these are familiar passages, but just kind of adding my little commentary here. This brings me a little bit of comfort, because despite the fact that they're rolling this out and they're enforcing and locking down and get your jab and jab, jab, jab, and you know. Vaccination. All that propaganda.

If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him. There is judgment. There's judgment coming for these people. And then it just brings me comfort.

As much as we're trying to do here on shows like Canary Cry News Talk and Exposed Lives or at least parse out what's true, what's not, and discuss these issues and think critically about what's happening in the world can ultimately rely on God to be the ultimate judge here. So good stuff there. That was good one. Matthew nine, I have one more here.

Verse 12 and 13, on hearing this, Jesus said, quote, I guess, quote, I just see the quotations I say, quote, but on hearing this, Jesus said, it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick, but go and learn what this means. My desire mercy, not sacrifice for I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners. Of course, it's talking about Jesus, what Jesus is doing calling out to the sinners, but it's a good detail there. It's not the healthy who need a doctor.

And it's funny because this example has been used quite a bit, you know, and like, oh, the people who need Jesus are the sinners of the world, you know. And if you're saved, then you already have Jesus. So that's not who Jesus is calling upon here. But in this analogy, this is a very interesting aspect.

If you apply it to what's happening now, it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. What just happened in the last six months, a bunch of healthy people need basically a doctor, a vaccine needed, I put needed an air quotes here, but a bunch of healthy people, why didn't God vaccinate it? It's just crazy to me that there are scriptures, especially like Christians that are really pushing for the vaccine, and I guess some people had to get it for jobs or whatever. And I'm not saying if you get it, you're gonna die or you're sold your soul or anything like that.

And I mentioned this again and again, the technology behind the vaccine questionable, long-term effects questionable, certainly skeptical of a lot of that. But more than any of that stuff is the philosophical nature of what's happening and the authoritarian moves by government and by the medical establishment, everything like that. That's where I see more of an issue here, rather than just the technology of the job itself. So just to clarify, because I know people get caught up in the various things that could be within the vaccine.

And those things are important to look at, I'm not saying don't look at it, but just keep in mind that it's really the overall philosophical approach, the worldview that's been projected, the enforcement, the social engineering, all the rest of it, that's a lot more troubling than the technology itself. So anyway, those are just some scriptures. I thought I'd interject while I talk about this. And I see Andu Matty in the chat here, and I appreciate that because I had, well, what happened to my stuff here?

Biden, okay, oh, yes, okay. So I got an email from Andu Matty, he's kind of one of our biologists, many people in medicine that listened to the show and contributed to everyone's in a while to correct us if we go to overboard with something or help us explain certain things a little better or whatever it is. So Inu Matty sent us a note here, and he said, came across this while scanning the alt news sites, and this is medscape.com. And he said, Vax, side effects being described by Vax doctors.

Only medical professionals can comment on the site. And as of this morning, almost 1,000 comments, assuming no dupes, that is 1,000 injections with effects, effects just among the doctors who self commented on the site. And it seems they correctly tied their new health ailments to the Vax, not coincidence. And yeah, so there's 592 comments here on this page.