If Moderates are Electable, Why are Ideologues Winning? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 5, 2019 · 49 MIN

If Moderates are Electable, Why are Ideologues Winning?

from The Science of Politics · host Niskanen Center

Atop Democratic primary polls, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are re-igniting a debate about whether moderates are more electable. Are voters pushing the candidates to the extremes or just looking for moderate alternatives? Andrew Hall finds that moderate candidates are more likely to win general elections, but that they are running for office less often than extremists. The benefits of office are declining and the costs are increasing, especially for potential moderates. But Stephen Utych finds that moderates are far less advantaged in general elections over extremists than they used to be. Partisan polarization means voters increasingly treat politicians in each party as interchangeable, lowering the costs of nominating extremists. Either way, voters are not the main cause of polarization. Studies: "Who Wants to Run" and "Man Bites Blue Dog" Interviews: Andrew Hall, Stanford University; Stephen Utych, Boise State University Photo credit: Gage Skidmore under CC by SA 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/19197596204

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 5, 2019

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

If Moderates are Electable, Why are Ideologues Winning?

0:00 49:03

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Science of Politics?

This episode is 49 minutes long.

When was this The Science of Politics episode published?

This episode was published on June 5, 2019.

Can I download this The Science of Politics episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!