IMPORTANT Episode 38: My Thoughts On The Murthy v. Missouri Supreme Court Hearing Yesterday episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 19, 2024 · 44 MIN

IMPORTANT Episode 38: My Thoughts On The Murthy v. Missouri Supreme Court Hearing Yesterday

from The Illusion of Consensus · host Jay Bhattacharya

Hi everyone, I have just recorded my first thoughts on the Murthy v. Missouri case, which involves the foundational First Amendment rights of Americans. I delve into the history of the case and the concerns about the Biden administration’s censorship regime. Also, I go into some detail about the preliminary injunction and Judge Terry Doughty's ruling, as well as the appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This is the first part of our exclusive Murthy v. Missouri coverage. Rav and I will be recording a podcast next to discuss the implications further. Moreover, we will be recording episodes with my co-plaintiff Aaron Kheriaty and Jenin Younes (an attorney on the case). The Illusion of Consensus is a citizen-funded podcast. Please consider supporting us by becoming a paid member: Takeaways: * The Murthy v. Biden case involves the First Amendment rights of Americans and concerns about censorship by the Biden administration. * There is a pattern of social media censorship, with the government directing social media companies to censor speech on various topics. * The preliminary injunction in the case ruled that the Biden administration was violating First Amendment rights, but the case is still ongoing. * The Supreme Court's decision in this case will have significant implications for the protection of free speech and the role of the government in censorship. Listen now: Apple: Spotify: Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to the Murthy v. Missouri Case 01:00 Concerns about Censorship by the Biden Administration 04:00 Role of the Government in Censorship 06:03 Preliminary Injunction and Judge Terry Doughty's Ruling 08:13 Appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals 09:39 Limitations of the Preliminary Injunction 10:34 Stanford University's Involvement 12:02 Government as the Source of Misinformation 16:20 Supreme Court Hearing: Standing and Traceability 21:45 Traceability and Coercion by the Government 24:35 First Amendment and its Application 26:33 Government's Argument for Censorship 28:30 Analogies and Differences with Traditional Media 31:27 Coercion vs. Persuasion by the Government 35:12 Restrictions on Social Media Companies 39:05 Hypotheticals and the First Amendment 43:19 Stakes and Importance of the Supreme Court Decision If you would like to help us fund our podcast expansion to Rumble and YouTube, you may donate to us here. Your support is greatly appreciated: https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.illusionconsensus.com/subscribe

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 19, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

IMPORTANT Episode 38: My Thoughts On The Murthy v. Missouri Supreme Court Hearing Yesterday

0:00 44:54

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Illusion of Consensus?

This episode is 44 minutes long.

When was this The Illusion of Consensus episode published?

This episode was published on March 19, 2024.

Can I download this The Illusion of Consensus episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!