Improving Youth Programming: The Role of Research

Angela Irvine, director of research in the Criminal Justice Division of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, sat down for this podcast interview after participating in a research roundtable on youth courts that was sponsored by the Center for Court Innovation and the Lowenstein Family Foundation on July 18, 2012.  Irvine also discusses research into lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender justice-involved youth. ROBERT V. WOLF:  I’m Rob Wolf, director of communications at the Center for Court Innovation. In this New Thinking podcast, I’m with Angela Irvine, director of research of the criminal justice division of the National Council of Crime and Delinquency. And I have the good fortune to have a few minutes with her just as she’s finished participating in a research roundtable on youth courts that the Center for Court Innovation hosted here today in Manhattan, at the law firm of Skadden Arps. So thanks, Angela, for taking the time to talk with me. ANGELA IRVINE:  Thank you for having me. WOLF: Are there particular challenges that researchers face when looking at a justice program geared for youth? IRVINE:  I’m not sure if there are different challenges. I think that people, in a lot of ways, have given up on adult criminals. In a lot of ways I find research on adults challenging because it’s hard to engage a public, or to find a source of sympathy for adult criminals. I think that what’s actually exciting about doing research in the juvenile justice arena is that we have the possibility of engaging sympathy for different populations of youth who are engaged in the system. I think if you look at girls in the juvenile justice system, researchers have done a really good job of sort of highlighting the links between past traumatic experiences and how that drives young people into the juvenile justice system, and how therefore we, as a society, need to take responsibility for creating firewalls so that girls who have experienced trauma don’t end up in the juvenile justice system. And what I’m really interested in, moving forward, is thinking about ways to engage the public in becoming more sympathetic to boys of color who are in the juvenile justice system who’ve also experienced trauma. WOLF:  One thing I hear you saying is that there’s a greater, perhaps, societal interest in research of justice programs that focus on youth, and that is because it’s easier to have empathy for youth? IRVINE:  I think so, yes, compared to adults. WOLF:  And is it also because there’s this general sense that there’s a greater possibility of rehabilitation? IRVINE:  I think that there is so much fear of boys of color, in particular—in public schools, in public spaces, and so I’m not sure how much the general public thinks about wanting to rehabilitate that population. In theory I think that the juvenile court system was developed to rehabilitate young people in a different way than the adult criminal justice system has been, but I think that we’re caught in a little bit of a quagmire right now. If you look from the ’80s on, I think that that’s when super-predators in urban Chicago, urban New York, started to take over media. You know – WOLF:  Like “wilding,” that kind of thing? IRVINE:  Yeah, exactly. And I think that it’s really important for us to sort of stop the fear of those young people, and to try to move back in time, to a time when we really do think of the juvenile justice system as different than the adult criminal justice system, and a system that does seriously invest in the rehabilitation of those young people, because they’re all our kids. WOLF:  And do you think researchers have a role to play in helping to change that orientation?  IRVINE:  Researcher always have a role in identifying which program should be invested in. So if researchers identify programs that effectively reduce recidivism or improve graduation rates, I think that the government, the federal government, state governments always justify their investment in programs based on research. I think that it’s really important to think about who the researchers should be doing this work. I think it’s really important that we try to recruit researchers of color who come from the neighborhoods where we are arresting most of the people, so that we can have a richer discussion about what the findings are, but also have a richer discussion about what the possible solutions are because in my experience, researchers who are more familiar with low-income communities of color come up with more realistic solutions in terms of effectively changing behavior, essentially. WOLF:  You’ve done a lot of research with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth, and they face a number of problems that make them more likely to offend or get involved in the system. I wonder if you can maybe explain some of your findings. IRVINE:  The most important finding is that LGBT youth are over represented in the system. We surveyed young people at the point of arrest and we found that at that point, 15 percent of young people disclosed being lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender, which we believe is a higher percentage than the general population, though we don’t have an accurate measure of the general population. And if you just aggregate by what we consider, you know, traditionally consider gender, that’s about 11 percent of boys but 27 percent of girls. I also think it’s important to remember that we have the same disclosure rates for African-American, Latino, and white youth. Now, in terms of why LGBT youth are there, our surveys show that LGBT youth were twice as likely to be removed from their home as children because of conflict with their parents, were twice as likely to be homeless at some point in time, and then twice as likely to be held in detention for status offenses like running away, or prostitution. WOLF:  Your employer, the National Council of Crime and Delinquency, started a project called Improving Permanency for LGBT Youth, which is trying to build an infrastructure of permanent, competent housing for LGBT youth. IRVINE:  So I think that what’s really exciting for me about this program is that youth who are placed outside of their home are at risk for negative outcomes, no matter who you are. I think that the data shows that if you are a youth of color, or that if you’re LGBT, you’re less likely to be placed in a home that can meet your needs because it’s very difficult to identify foster parents of color, or group homes that can adequately serve the needs of African-American and Latino youth, and LGBT youth. And so what you see is then youth running away from placement, and then because they’re running away from placement, then they get elevated to higher levels of placement, and they essentially get anchored into the system. So in each of three counties, Alameda, Orange, and Fresno county, we’re going to be working with task forces and the goal of all three task forces would be immediately to try to pass anti-discrimination policies because that—the moment of crisis is when LGBT youth are in juvenile detention centers, and we need to make sure that youth are not discriminated against, that we deconstruct homophobic sort of systems, what people say, but also how particular gender non-conforming youth are placed in housing units. But then the next step is to try to dig into these communities and see, what is the infrastructure?  How many, you know, do we have homes that have been identified as LGBT culturally competent?  Are there solutions that can be put into place to reunify kids with their families, or with some sort of kin care, sooner than later? WOLF:  And will research be playing a role in the development of this program?  How will researchers be helping inform this process? IRVINE:  That’s a really good question. So the project is being managed by Bernadette Brown, who’s a really accomplished attorney and LGBT advocate. And so she’ll be running the task forces in each of the counties. And then I’ll sit on, as a researcher, each of the task forces and make sure that we are setting data-collection protocols into place, so that we can measure outcomes for youth in each of those system. WOLF:  So let me ask you about what brought you here, to New York today, from Oakland, California, your home. So you spent the day here in Manhattan, here at the law firm of Scadden Arps, where we are now in the middle of an incredible thunderstorm. So the theme of the roundtable discussion was on the topic of youth courts and research. The roundtable itself was sponsored by the Center for Court Innovation. And I’m wondering now, after the five-hour conversation, you know, what did you learn from it, and what did you think about youth courts before you arrived and have your attitudes changed or is it too early to really make any particular declaration? IRVINE:  I think that my initial concerns about youth courts is that they were a program that could accidentally pull low-risk youth into either the juvenile justice system or school disciplinary procedures. WOLF:  Maybe I’ll just clarify that youth courts, as we’re talking about them here, are program ...