Skip to content
Inconsistent and Repugnant episode artwork

Nov 30, 2023 1 hr 10 min

Inconsistent and Repugnant

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

On today’s episode, David and Sarah break down the most interesting Supreme Court argument of this term and what it means for the future of double jeopardy law. But first, they have to shout out the dating site that is the AO comment section. Also on the docket: -Mistrials vs. double jeopardy -Federal rights and state interpretations -The coolest word you've never used -David calls for thoughtful comments -How to lose with valor at SCOTUS -Fifth circuit on the brain -A second bite of the Rahimi apple -Revealing AO's next long-awaited guest Show notes: -SNL: Weights and Measures with Nate Bargatze -McElrath v. Georgia -Blockburger v. United States -Fifth Circuit and Rahimi

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Inconsistent and Repugnant

0:00 1:10:53

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on November 30, 2023.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.