IP 28 Explained: The Oregon Measure That Could End Hunting, Fishing & Ranching

Could Oregon’s IP 28 fundamentally change hunting, fishing, ranching, and animal agriculture in the state? In this episode of Oregon Discussion, Mike McLane and Shelly Boshart-Davis sit down with Lauren Kuenzi from the Oregon Farm Bureau to break down Initiative Petition 28, also known as the “PEACE Act.”The conversation covers what the measure would actually do, how it changes Oregon’s animal cruelty laws, and why agriculture groups, hunting organizations, and rural communities are raising alarm.Topics include:What IP 28 actually changes in Oregon lawHow the measure impacts farming and ranchingHunting and fishing concernsArtificial insemination and livestock practicesOregon’s agriculture economyRegulatory pressure on family farmsMeasure 110 comparisons and unintended consequencesOregon’s urban-rural divideWhy coalition groups are mobilizing earlyGuest: Lauren Kuenzi — Government & Political Affairs Director, Oregon Farm BureauWebsite ⁠https://oregondoge.com⁠Follow Oregon Discussion:YouTube ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@OregonDiscussion⁠X ⁠https://x.com/ORDiscussion⁠Instagram ⁠https://www.instagram.com/oregondiscussion/⁠Facebook ⁠https://www.facebook.com/p/Oregon-DOGE-61574156636517/⁠TikTok ⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@oregondiscussion⁠IP 28 Oregon, PEACE Act Oregon, Oregon animal cruelty law, Oregon Farm Bureau, Lauren Kuenzi, Oregon hunting laws, Oregon fishing laws, Oregon agriculture, Oregon ranching, Oregon farming, Oregon politics, Oregon ballot measure, Oregon initiative petition, Mike McLane, Shelly Boshart Davis, Oregon Discussion podcast, Measure 110 comparison, Oregon rural economy, Oregon regulation, Oregon livestock industry