Is California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Constitutional? (NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta) episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 18, 2024 · 42 MIN

Is California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Constitutional? (NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta)

from Free Speech Arguments · host Institute for Free Speech

NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta, argued before Judges Milan D. Smith, Jr., Mark J. Bennett, and Anthony D. Johnstone in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on July 17, 2024. Argued by Robert Corn-Revere (on behalf of NetChoice, LLC) and Kristin Liska, Deputy Attorney General (on behalf of Robert Bonta, Attorney General of the State of California). A Description of the Law, from the Appellee’s Response Brief: The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, AB 2273, is one of the most expansive efforts to censor online speech since the inception of the internet. Born from British regulations unfettered by the First Amendment, the Act requires online services to: (1) develop and make available to the State plans to “mitigate or eliminate” any risks their services “could” expose a minor to “potentially harmful” content before publishing any content, (2) publish only content “appropriate” for minors without first verifying with “reasonable certainty” the user is an adult, (3) not publish content based on user preferences unless it is in minors’ “best interests,” and (4) enforce content moderation policies to the State’s satisfaction. Issues Presented, from the Appellant’s Opening Brief: 1. Whether the district court erred in applying heightened scrutiny to provisions of the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act that regulate businesses’ collection and use of children’s data? 2. Whether the district court erred in determining that Plaintiff was likely to succeed on its claim that the Act violates the First Amendment? 3. Whether the district court erred in enjoining the Act in its entirety, in violation of California severability principles? Resources: Appellant’s Opening Brief Appellee’s Response Brief California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (CAADCA) The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you’re enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute’s mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

NOW PLAYING

Is California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Constitutional? (NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta)

0:00 42:46

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

HOMELAND HOMELAND The Church is a body not a building. It's the bride of Jesus Christ! Jesus is coming back for a mature bride. That means it's time for the church of Jesus Christ to move from milk to meat. This is the hour of maturity!HOMELAND is an announcement that the church is being set free. Only the church has the ability to transform the world. The kingdom's of this world will become the kingdoms of our Lord and Savior!All of creation has been waiting for this moment! Sons and daughters of God are rising up and taking their seat! Rich and Weekly Wondery We’re fascinated with the lives of both the famous and the infamous. From the Kardashians and Kendrick to Britney and the Bravo-verse, RICH AND WEEKLY is your dose of the hottest and latest celebrity news. Brooke Siffrinn and Aricia Skidmore-Williams, hosts of the hit series Even the Rich and Even the Royals, spill the tea, dish the dirt, and tell you exactly what they think. New episodes drop every Thursday.Listen to Rich and Weekly on the Wondery App or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to all episodes ad-free on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Start your free trial by visiting wondery.com/links/rich-and-weekly/ now. Take Me Off Your List Pitchfire Ryan O'Hara, CEO and founder of Pitchfire dives into the wild world of B2B marketing, demand generation, sales, and all things go-to-market with the help of some friends. Sponsored by Pitchfire. Sign up for free: https://www.pitchfire.com We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network The Investor's Podcast Network We interview and study famous financial billionaires, including Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio, and Howard Marks, and teach you what we learn and how you can apply their investment strategies in the stock market.We Study Billionaires is the largest stock investing podcast show in the world with 180,000,000+ downloads and is hosted by Stig Brodersen, Preston Pysh, William Green, Clay Finck, and Kyle Grieve.This podcast also includes the Richer Wiser Happier series hosted by best-selling author William Green. William regularly interviews legendary investors such as Mohnish Pabrai and Guy Spier, exploring what they can teach us about how to succeed in markets and life.And finally, our Bitcoin Fundamentals series is hosted by Preston Pysh, where he interviews prominent figures in the Bitcoin and macroeconomic space. To learn more about TIP, you can visit theinvestorspodcast.com or subscribe to our free daily newsletter <a hre

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Free Speech Arguments?

This episode is 42 minutes long.

When was this Free Speech Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on July 18, 2024.

What is this episode about?

NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta, argued before Judges Milan D. Smith, Jr., Mark J. Bennett, and Anthony D. Johnstone in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on July 17, 2024. Argued by Robert Corn-Revere (on behalf of NetChoice, LLC) and Kristin...

Can I download this Free Speech Arguments episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!