On Consider This NPR's Afternoon News Podcast, we cover everything from politics to the economy to the world, but every story starts with a question. And NPR, we stand for your right to be curious. It makes sense of the biggest story of the day and what it means for you. Follow Consider This, wherever you get your podcasts.
I don't know if she knows this, but our own Tamara Key got a dog named Koki over the late great Koki Roberts as well. Yup. I am actually in the market for a puppy, so. Well, you just had some name ideas thrown at you.
A little inspiration. Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Susan Davis. I cover politics.
I'm Deirdre Walschek, I cover Congress. And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior political editor and correspondent. In four days, into the fight to elect a speaker of the House, there's been a breakthrough. The House convened at noon today, and on the 12th ballot, California Republican Kevin McCarthy finally won over a block of his detractors.
14 of the 29 people holding out against him finally voted for him after agreeing to a number of concessions offered by McCarthy to win their support. But it's not over yet. No member elect, heaven received a majority of the votes cast. The speaker has not been elected.
On the 13th ballot, McCarthy landed at 214 votes, 212 votes went to Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, and still six detractors voted for Ohio Republican Jim Jordan, a McCarthy ally who doesn't want the job. The House then adjourned until 10 p.m. Eastern tonight. At which point McCarthy predicted he will get the votes he needs to win.
I think it's very positive. We're going to get it done tonight. The magic number votes can shift depending on who shows up, and if anyone votes present. Roughly two to four more votes are probably needed for McCarthy.
At least two McCarthy supporters, Ken Buck of Colorado and Wesley Hunt of Texas, are en route back to Washington to cast their ballots for him tonight. Deirdre, the talk on the Hill all last night and through this morning was about this potential breakthrough. I know that we talked on podcast this week about some of these concessions in the deal. Where did it land?
Well, it's still being called a framework, and there's really no paper. Even a lot of House Republicans say they haven't seen the details. They were briefed on a conference call this morning before votes started. But in general, it's a lot of the concessions that these anti-establishment Republicans have been asking for.
It's a mix of rules changes to how bills are debated on the House floor, to how they will deal with spending. That's sort of their big focus is trying to rein in federal spending. There's discussions about a vow to balance the budget in 10 years, but we don't have all the details on that. There is some talk about a vow to not allow a clean increase of the debt limit, but there's not a lot of details on that.
But some of the things we do know about are rules like the one that would change the threshold for how many members are needed to propose a resolution to House to Speaker, the current House Republican rule is five, and it's now going to be one. It's sort of a mix of actual concrete changes that have to be put into writing in the House rules. Some of it is just hand shake agreements. Sure, I'll agree to bring up a term limits bill, which is something that Ralph Norman of South Carolina has asked for.
It's good faith in part of it. It is. As one after the other, some of these flippers announced their votes for McCarthy who had been voting against him, they preface their vote saying in good faith negotiations if the deal holds warning if they find out something they don't like they could change their votes. But there's no indication that that's going to happen.
It seems to be that the momentum has definitely shifted in McCarthy's favor in a big way. We don't do this job because we like math, but I think we have to talk about the math just a little bit. We don't know the precise number, but we know he needs somewhere in the orbit of two to four more votes, most likely, assuming everyone shows back up. But he's got a couple of detractors that it's hard for me to see flipping those votes.
Matt Gates of Florida, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Bob Goode of Virginia. These are people that have described themselves as never Kevin. What's the orbit of the gettable vote look like right now? I really don't know.
There were people like Paul Gosar and Scott Perry who made pretty firm pronouncements about I can't see how I could ever get there. I'm Ralph Norman who we heard from said yesterday, it was sort of take a miracle. So I don't know. I think that there is a lot of pressure.
I think one House Republican ally of McCarthy's Don Bacon was saying to me last night, he thought the deal got half of the 20 and there would be this immense pressure once the dam broke to get the rest. So it's sort of seemed like that was starting to happen on the floor, but I agree with you. I'm sort of really curious to see how you get the last couple of votes. But those people have a lot of leverage if they really want something.
I mean, Dominican, McCarthy has had to concede at so many points to potentially win this, including things that he once called a red line that he could never support, for instance, allowing the motion of a cake to go back to just one member being able to offer it. And I think it begs the question, is it worth it? What does the speaker ship mean if he's had to chip away at all the powers of the office that make it capable of being an effective speaker? Well, how do you measure a man's ambition?
I mean, I really think that this is obviously a job that he's wanted for quite some time. And I do think though, for what it matters to the country, these kinds of concessions just indicate more and more, not just that the speaker ship is going to become weakened, but that McCarthy is going to be far more beholden to these intransigent far-right folks. I mean, when you're talking about something like no clean increase to the debt limit, what that translates to is having to cut spending, most likely, from other pieces of the government to be able to even increase that debt limit. And that's an argument we'd heard repeatedly from lots of Tea Party members when they were first sworn in, and they had this fight a decade ago over the debt limit.
They are being pretty cagey about how they're handling the debt limit in this deal. So I should say that we don't have all the details. Yeah. Yeah, well, clearly though, they want to cut spending.
They want to choke government. They want to make it smaller. They want to spend less. They've been talking about repeatedly over and over, whether it's defense spending or discretionary domestic spending.
All those things are going to be on the table. You're much more likely to see McCarthy have to deal with them than he is likely to deal with moderate Democrats, because that's what cost John Boehner's job, essentially the last time when he stepped down in 2015. But here's the thing though, even if you can forecast a scenario where 218 Republicans stick together on spending bills or on the debt limit, they still have a Democratic Senate and the Democrat in the White House. They seem to have, in some ways, they have bound McCarthy to all these promises that aren't really capable when the person that you're dealing with on the other end of the negotiating table is Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer.
They also jeopardize a lot of these House Republicans who just got elected from swing seats. They're going to put them on the record if they are serious about the kinds of spending cuts that they're talking about. We're probably slashing Social Security and Medicare. I don't know that they can defend those votes in Purple Districts.
These are right members are from very red districts. Their constituents want them to fight over a lot of these things. They don't particularly care if the government is shut down. They've shown a willingness to do that in the past.
And I think that this is going to really raise the stakes if it hasn't already for the congressional elections in 2024. Because imagine if this group had this kind of leverage in 2020, would we have had certified elections? The thing, the very thing that caused the January 6th insurrection in the first place, it's a very scary place for the democracy and where the country could be headed. You brought up January 6th and obviously it is January 6th and to me the timing of this is just sort of, it's fascinating in that two years ago today, almost to this minute, you know, Kevin McCarthy was under siege in the Capitol.
He was calling then President Donald Trump asking for help to call off the attack on the Capitol two years later to the day. He's potentially on the verge of being Speaker of the House. The career trajectory, I don't know if two years ago we would have thought this was possible here, Dr. Anya, here we are.
No, it's just bizarre. And it's also just bizarre being in the building today with these commemorations going on and members, you know, putting out all these statements. It just sort of seems like Democrats are commemorating the two-year university and Republicans are pretty much ignoring it. I did think it was interesting that Ralph Norman talking to reporters after that 12th ballot in which he voted for McCarthy invoked January 6th but did it in this sort of, I don't want to say positive way, but that this was a good thing to happen on today of all days.
For us coming together, at this time on January 6th, the future. It's a fascinating way to look at January 6th, at least from the conservative perspective, especially someone who voted against the election results. It's hardly coming together with the entire Congress. And it was interesting to hear that McCarthy said that the fact that it's taken this long shows that we've learned how to govern.
I mean, he's learned how to govern. I think that's what they call spin. I think that's a pretty textbook definition of how to spin something in your face. His other spin was about changing this rule that would allow just one lawmaker to oust the speaker saying that's the way it was before Nancy Pelosi was Speaker.
But that's also what led ultimately to John Boehner resigning. And look how well that turned out. Well, and if he's learned how to govern this way, then the things that it portends for the future is having to deal with and concede to the far right. All right, let's take a quick break.
Dear Joe, we're going to let you go for a minute, catch your breath. We'll have you back later. Domenico, stick around. And we're back and we're joined by White House correspondent, Franco Ardonias.
Hey, Franco. Hey, there. So President Biden gave an address yesterday on border security. The White House plans to reduce unlawful entry into the United States and increase resources related to immigration.
My message is this. If you're trying to leave Cuba, Nicaragua or Haiti, you have a, or have agreed to begin a journey to America, do not, do not just show up at the border. Stay where you are and apply legally from there. Starting today, if you don't apply through the legal process, you will not be eligible for this new parole program.
He's also planning to visit the U.S. Mexico border next week as part of a trip out west to meet with the leaders of Canada and Mexico. Franco, before we get into the president's address, could you just give us some perspective on how big of a problem the U.S.-Mexico border is right now in terms of border security? Yeah.
I mean, it's a big, big challenge. I mean, U.S. authorities have made more than two million immigration arrests on the border over the last years amount of time. I mean, that's the first time in modern times that they've exceeded this number.
So I mean, we're talking very record numbers. What is also interesting is that the kind of migration has changed and the dynamics have changed where back in the day it was more Mexican migrants and then over the last, then it switched to Central American migrants. Now we're seeing a lot of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian, Nicaragua, and even Ecuadorian migrants. So it's a different kind of fabric of migrants that are coming in big, big numbers.
I mean, Republicans in particular have been very critical of Black's border enforcement. What did Biden say in terms of how he plans to address this going forward? Well, he was pretty firm about what his plans were. I mean, he was very politically critical of Republicans, but at the same time, he announced plans for some significant expansions of enforcement on the border.
Specifically, he's expanding a pandemic era program that will allow the United States, allow the Biden administration to expel Nicaraguan, Cuban, and Haitian immigrants who try to cross the border illegally. He's also going to expand some legal pathways for those groups as many as 30,000 migrants from those countries and Venezuela. I should note that this expansion is based on a plan that they implemented a few months ago for Venezuelan specifically. So it adds those three additional countries.
But in regards to the allowing greater legal pathways, they really are small numbers in consideration of the enforcement measures that he's implementing. So it's a big effort to kind of stem that tide of migration. He's also promising more resources on the border to hire more border agents and just get more help there to address this issue. But it is a big change outlining Cuba, Nicaragua, and Haiti.
For so long, we've heard about El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala as where people were coming from. And this has just been an issue that has really, as we've seen, not just with the speaker vote in Congress, but with negotiations and how the Republican Party in particular has changed over the last 15 years. This has really become an issue where negotiations just haven't been possible. It is a big issue.
It's one that seemed like there was a potential path to a solution almost a decade ago in 2013 when more than two thirds of the Senate was on board with it, but the rug was pulled out by House Republicans. Really, this is an issue that has become a cultural, political touchstone for Republicans. We're negotiations just aren't seen as possible. It's a major problem, one that a lot of towns are dealing with overrun with not having enough resources and not something that the federal government appears able and ready to fix.
Do you see the timing of this as notable because Republicans have made immigration a central focus of their argument against Joe Biden's leadership for the better part of the past two years? And I think it's fair to say that the White House hasn't focused as much on immigration as their critics would like them to. And so the timing of this with the new Congress coming in seems to suggest that the president's trying to get ahead of some of this criticism, especially as there are some legitimate criticisms about the handling of the U.S.-Mexico border. Yeah, and there's been a lot of criticism, frankly, from allies of the president, of border Democrats in particular who have said that they think that the White House hasn't been dealing with this, hasn't focused on it as strongly.
The White House hasn't been talking about it as firmly. You know, when this has been sort of relegated to the corners of conservative media and talking points, it seemed like the White House was fine with somewhat, not ignoring the situation, but making Biden the principal spokesperson. We've seen certainly the Department of Homeland Security head, Alejandro Mayorkas, talking about this, the Vice President has gone down to the border previously, but none of it has really seemed to fix the issue. And again, we have to come back to the fact that there really hasn't been a federal fix to the fact that there's a massive backlog in the courts.
And I think that the White House sees this as something that is going to become, if not already a principal issue, but going to become something that a lot of people start to focus on. Yeah, I mean, I just add that, you know, like this is Biden's first visit to the border as president, is a signal that he's now has to kind of face this issue. You know, Dominica was noting, you know, this was mostly talked about in kind of conservative circles. Yes, there were some Democrats who were wanting Biden to do more, but it didn't become like such a big issue, for example, in the midterms.
You know, as many of us expected it to be, this has always been a vulnerable spot for Biden, but he didn't have to confront it as much as was expected. But now with the new House coming in and promising to make more hay out of this, Biden's got to address it. And I think you heard that in his speech, not only in his words, saying that this is a hard issue and we have to deal with, but you also heard it in the tenor of his voice and how subdued he was in acknowledging how emotional and difficult and politically challenging it is. Franco, the White House also said that some of these measures will need to be implemented in partnership with Mexico.
The president is going to meet with leaders of Canada and Mexico soon. Obviously, immigration border issues are going to be on that agenda, but is there other significant issues between the three countries that need to be addressed in this meeting? Yeah, definitely. I mean, this visit to the border on the way, they are bringing it up right before the North American leaders summit all show indicate how important immigration will be to these talks.
Obviously, Mexico is a key partner in this effort. You know, Biden talked about how, you know, U.S. border patrol officers are already embedded with Mexican patrols, you know, trying to detect U.S. smuggling operations.
So it's going to be a big part. But in addition to that, obviously, fentanyl and other drug issues, counter narcotics will be another big issue that they're going to be discussing. There's a lot going on. So thanks so much for joining us today.
We're going to take a quick break and when we're back, it's time for Can't Let It Go. And we're back and welcome back to your draft. Hey, there. So it's time to end the show like we do every week with Can't Let It Go, the part of the show where we talk about the things from the week that we just can't stop talking about politics or otherwise.
Deirdre, I'm going to ask you first what you can't let go, but since we have not let you out of the capital in four days, I'm imagining it might have something to do with what's been going on up there. Yeah, I have really been trapped here. So is it bad pizza? There's a lot of that just sort of take out everywhere and no real good food in the basement.
But anyway, the thing I can't let go of is the kids and the pets in the chamber. So as a parent and a pet owner, who doesn't like to see a cute puppy or a cute baby, but we've been here for four days guys. Like shouldn't these poor children be allowed to take an app or go home or go to school? Well, at the first day, it's traditional for members, especially new members to bring their young kids or grandkids on the floor.
And it's particularly dressed in their Sunday bath. Oh, yeah. Usually the kids are dressed like they're going for like a full Christmas family photo look. They do because there's a photo op and they've set up the area for this family photo op day after day.
And obviously never never been able to use it. But as we go day by day, there's fewer and fewer kids. Now there's just been some really little babies. One house Democrat Jimmy Gomez has been wearing this baby carrier with his little new son, hodge in it and has been tweeting all these pictures.
He's been changing the baby on the floor of the Democratic cloakroom. He's been doing interviews on Zoom with the baby next to him. He's been feeding the baby. There's a really funny picture of his baby with Joaquin Castro's baby next to each other in the cloakroom saying they are future prom dates.
I mean, they're very shiny babies. Nancy Mase didn't bring a child. She brought a really little puppy and she walked in on a leash into the speaker's lobby. And then I was like, she's going to bring that on the floor and she picked up the puppy, went in and cast a remote for Kevin McCarthy.
Because apparently she said too because dogs are not allowed on the floor of the house. I've learned this, but that she said because they're not sworn in yet and because there's no rules package, there's no rule to break. So she brought her dog on. Yeah.
True story before the speaker vote started. Neither of those babies was born. That feels like how long it's gone on. Anyway, I can't imagine having to be responsible for kids and pets, both of which I have as well and have to try to work while all the cameras of C-spanner's stuck on you.
I imagine this week there has been a lot of impatient spouses and children who traveled to DC for the photo op and are like not amused by the speaker drama. No chicken nuggets and mac and cheese, not enough of them. Yeah, I will say, so far I feel like the babies have been pretty well behaved, maybe more than the members. So Sue, what can't you let go of?
My kid let go this week is kind of related because obviously we've been obsessing about this event, but the thing I can't let go this week is C-span untamed. Another loophole in this weird week we've lived is that, and I don't know, we know this well, but I don't know if the broader public knows this, but when you watch C-span, the cameras in the chamber are controlled by the government. Like the house and Senate are in control of what you can see, which is normally when you watch C-spanner, you just get to see the speaker, like the main rostrums or the speakers or the wide shot. Like there's only a couple of shots you normally see, but because we're in this weird in between where the house hasn't constituted yet, C-spanner is allowed to have more free reign of the cameras.
They are in control of the cameras. The only other time this ever happens is on state of the union when they allow network cameras and TV cameras to move more freely. But the use of these free reign camera has given us so many great images of all the drama that has played out on the floor that we wouldn't have seen otherwise if the rules have been instituted quickly and that they would lock the cameras back down. It's been amazing.
C-span has also been noting this all week long throughout their coverage. What you're seeing on the house floor is courtesy of C-spanner, camera folks who are in charge of the cameras right now. What you're seeing, all these conversations on the house floor are courtesy of C-spanner being in control of the chamber. That is what's called swagger.
That's gleeful for C-spanner. That is gleeful for C-spanner. That is gleeful for C-spanner. It's amazing.
The huddles, the odd groups of people that are clustered in the back wall. You can see and you're like, I'm in the chamber and it's really hard for me sometimes to see where they are. But when I walk out and flip on C-span and my booth, I was like, oh my God, what are they saying? They were all up in the drama all week and I loved it.
I thought about a couple of the moments with Matt Gaetz in heated discussion with some members, Jim Jordan today, some blowing raspberries with his head and his arm on the back railing. Then there was this viral moment where Paul Gosar was talking to Alexandra Kazur Cortez. He's the one who tweeted out this anime video depicting killing her and my president Biden. This was just one of those moments and she's standing there patiently nodding and she revealed that he was asking her whether there was any Democratic plan to potentially subvert everything and help McCarthy and she assured him absolutely not.
This is definitely otherwise but I think it's the thing that's been consuming a lot of the country and it's both the worst and best story of the week and that's Demar Hamlin, the Buffalo Bills safety who collapsed on the field after what appeared to be a routine hit on Monday night football and CPR was done. The ambulance had to come out on the field. They canceled the game. Something had never been done or seen before in the NFL really saw the emotional side from a lot of players and the real positive thing this week is that he's now awake breathing on his own, squeezing his family's hands and actually delivered a message to his team.
They said the first thing he said when he woke up was, did we win? You won the game. That's amazing. Yeah and he's a really good dude just outside of football.
He's one of these guys who is from Pittsburgh. He's been really involved in his community. He set up a foundation, the Chasing M's foundation where he runs these toys for Tots campaigns to try to get kids toys in his community and his foundation, Chasing M's, what's interesting about it is he had a go fund me up to try to raise $2,500. Now that all this has happened it's over $8 million.
Wow. That is great. Well that's a good note to end this week on I think guys. That is a wrap for us today.
I also want to just personally point of host personal privilege here and say thank you, Deirdre, thank you, Demenico. We have done this podcast together all week long and very cast. Nobody else wanted to do it. It's been a pleasure.
We're the three best friends that anybody ever had. There you go. And before we go, another special shout out to two people who are leaving our team today are amazing intern Catherine Swartz who is joining the team at here now for the next couple months and our crock fellow, Jimisei, who's heading to NPR's National Desk. They've been key parts of the machine that keeps this podcast running and we are very grateful for their hard work and wish them luck.
Our executive producer is Muthoni Matori. Our editor is Eric McDaniel. Our producers are Alaina Moore and Casey Morrell. Thanks to Brandon Carter, Lexi Shippittle and Kristina of Calimer.
I'm Susan Davis, I cover politics. I'm Deirdre Walsh, I cover Congress. And I'm Demenico Monson, our senior political editor and correspondent. Thanks for listening to the NPR politics podcast.