Is Risk-Reducing OS for Ov Ca Overrated? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 8, 2024 · 47 MIN

Is Risk-Reducing OS for Ov Ca Overrated?

from Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls · host Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls

A substantial collection of evidence indicates that the fallopian tube serves as the primary site of origin for a large portion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. As a result, clinical practice guidelines (including from the ACOG) recommend salpingectomy for permanent contraception- when necessary- rather than simple tubal ligation. But an August 2023 publication, in JAMA Network Open, stated that women who undergo a salpingectomy are no more or less at risk of ovarian cancer compared to traditional tubal ligation. Why? In this episode, we will summarize this controversial publication and contrast that to a systematic review the following month, in September 2023 in JAMA Surgery, which provides an alternative conclusion. Should we still perform opportunistic salpingectomies (OS) rather than tubal ligations in the average-risk patient? We’ll explain the data and provide clinical pearls for practice at the end of the episode. Thank you, Bret, for this clinical conundrum as a podcast episode recommendation! You ask…we do!

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 8, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Is Risk-Reducing OS for Ov Ca Overrated?

0:00 47:21

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls?

This episode is 47 minutes long.

When was this Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls episode published?

This episode was published on July 8, 2024.

Can I download this Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!