Skip to content
#ITC10 episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 28, 2018 · 25 MIN

#ITC10

from In That Case

ITC#10: Jim McGinty on McGinty v WA For many years, there was gross disparity in voting power in Western Australia, between electors in huge and sparsely populated regional electorates, and those in metropolitan electorates. It had long been a source of objection. Jim McGinty was a member of the WA parliament when he brought an unsuccessful High Court challenge to the laws which created the gap in voting power, before (as Attorney-General) he finally achieved the long hoped-for legislative reform to achieve greater parity.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 28, 2018

Embed this episode

Ready to play

#ITC10

0:00 25:05

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of In That Case?

This episode is 25 minutes long.

When was this In That Case episode published?

This episode was published on September 28, 2018.

Can I download this In That Case episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!